Lamivudine and indinavir/ritonavir maintenance therapy in highly pretreated HIV-infected patients (Vista ANRS 109).

OBJECTIVE: In patients with extensive HIV resistance, one option is to delay salvage therapy until new drugs become available. We hypothesized that this delay period could be based on a simplified treatment, which would reduce drug toxicity, stabilize resistance, and prevent resurgence of wild-type virus. METHODS: A prospective 24-week treatment simplification study in HIV-1-infected patients having failed several lines of antiretroviral therapy, with CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 100 cells/ml, plasma HIV RNA (viral load [VL]) > or = 4 log10 copies/ml and a resistance genotype predicting less than two active drugs. Treatment associated ritonavir-boosted low-dose indinavir (200 mg twice daily) and lamivudine (150 mg twice daily). The primary endpoint was a decrease in CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 25% or increase in VL > or = 0.7 log copies/ml relative to baseline. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were included. Baseline median VL was 4.5 log10 copies/ml and median CD4+ T-cell count was 290 cells/ml. During the study, 10/26 patients (38%, 95% confidence interval = 20.2-59.4) reached the primary endpoint. No patient had an AIDS-defining event. At week 24, the median change in plasma VL was +0.2 log10 copies/ml (interquartile range (IQR): 0-0.5; P = 0.003). The median change in CD4+ T-cell counts was -49 cells/ml (IQR: -14 to -93, P < 0.001), with a median decline slope of 10 cells/ml/month, which was not different from that measured under full highly active antiretroviral therapy during the 6 months preceding inclusion. There were no significant changes in HIV-1 protease and reverse transcriptase genotypes during the study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced resistance, treatment simplification prevented resurgence of wild-type HIV, reduced drug burden, but failed to stabilize progression of the immune deficiency.

French national sentinel survey of antiretroviral drug resistance in patients with HIV-1 primary infection and in antiretroviral-naive chronically infected patients in 2001-2002.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the frequency of genotypic antiretroviral resistance and the spread of non-B subtypes in patients with primary HIV-1 infection (2001-2002) and in treatment-naive chronically HIV-1-infected patients (2001). METHODS: Plasma samples from 303 patients with acute HIV-1 infection (Primo study) and 363 treatment-naive patients with chronic HIV-1 infection (Odyssee study) were tested for genotypic resistance. Resistance mutations were identified from the International AIDS Society Resistance Testing-USA panel and resistant viruses were defined according to the French Agence Nationale de Recherches sur le SIDA (ANRS) resistance algorithm. RESULTS: In the Primo study, 14% of the patients had viruses with resistance mutations and 12% of patients had viruses with mutations conferring resistance to least 1 antiretroviral drug. Thirty patients had viruses with mutations to at least 1 antiretroviral drug in a single pharmacologic class. Six patients were infected by viruses resistant to 2 or 3 classes of drugs. In the Odyssee study, the prevalence of reverse transcript (RT) associated and major protease inhibitor-associated mutations was 6.1% (95% CI: 3.6-8.6). Six patients had viruses resistant to at least 1 antiretroviral drug and 3 patients had viruses resistant to 2 classes of antiretroviral drugs. Twenty-four percent of acutely infected patients harbored non-B subtype strains (19% in 1999-2000) and 33.2% of chronically infected patients (10% in 1998; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: In France, the frequency of HIV-1 resistance in untreated patients was not significantly higher in 2001-2002 than in previous surveys while the prevalence of non-B subtypes is increasing.