Matching dental practice board data to the health authority population register.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the process of matching Dental Practice Board (DPB) registration data to the health authority (HA) register for a defined locality. This included testing for the presence of socio-economic bias in the postcodes held in the DPB data sets and to determine if patients travelling to obtain primary dental care would have an effect on the matching process at health authority level. BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN: All 21 general dental practitioners in Ellesmere Port, South Cheshire gave written consent for the DPB to provide files of their registered patients to the health authority. The registered patients were electronically matched against residents in the HA register in a four stage process. Testing for the presence of a socio-economic bias in the postcodes included in the DPB data set was undertaken by constructing frequency distributions of the proportions of postcoded, and non or partially postcoded DPB records by Super Profiles Lifestyle group. A chi square test was used to test for significant differences. The extent of patients travelling to access primary dental care was assessed by comparing the proportions of registered patients of under 6 years, 25-60 years and those aged 65+ who lived outside South Cheshire Health Authority yet obtained their GDS care within Ellesmere Port. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Out of a total of 39,474 records, 458 (1.2%) were duplicates. Some 35,447 (90.9%) of DPB records could be matched to those contained in the HA register. No significant (chi2 =10.85, df=9, P=0.27) socio-economic difference was found in the proportions of DPB records originally with, and without postcodes by Super Profiles Lifestyle group. Some 1,688 (47.3%) of the unmatched subjects were resident in health authorities other than South Cheshire and therefore could not be expected to be found in the HA register. Nearly 90% of children under 6 years registered with an Ellesmere Port GDP were South Cheshire residents, compared to approximately 85% of adults of working age and older adults. CONCLUSIONS: In this locality DPB data could be matched to the HA register with a reasonable degree of success. However, because of the time taken to clean and make the data sets compatible, the methodology used is inappropriate for routine use. In this locality no socio-economic bias could be found in the records with missing postcodes in the DPB data set. Patients travelling to access dental care would have little influence on the matching process at health authority level in this locality, irrespective of the age group under study.

A preliminary communication on whether general dental practitioners have a role in identifying dental patients with mental health problems.

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether general dental practitioners regard themselves as having a role in identifying dental patients with mental health problems. METHOD: Telephone interviews were conducted with, and postal questionnaires were sent to, a random sample (n = 94) of general dental practitioners on Health Authority lists within the Mersey Region. A total of 84 general dental practitioners responded, resulting in an 89% response rate. RESULTS: The majority of general dental practitioners had encountered patients with mental health problems (78% of interviewees, 56% of questionnaire responders). However, nearly half of the interviewees (46%) do not refer patients with mental health problems. When referrals to dental specialists were made, they tended to be regarding a physical manifestation rather than a psychological one. The majority of interviewees and questionnaire responders (55% and 82% respectively) expressed a 'positive' response to the development of a referral role. Nevertheless, there were some reservations concerning the practicalities of its development and implementation. CONCLUSION: The majority of general dental practitioners consider a role in identifying patients with possible mental health problems. This role might include, being able to identify patients with undiagnosed mental health problems, and being aware of dental conditions which may be caused by mental health problems. To achieve this, inter-professional co-operation between general dental practitioners and other health professionals requires development.

Dental caries, contact with dental services and deprivation in young children: their relationship at a small area level.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the relationship between tooth decay, contact with dental services and deprivation at electoral ward level. SETTING: The study was carried out in 1998 in Ellesmere Port in the North West of England. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: All children younger than six years resident in Ellesmere Port registered with GDS services and those using CDS services were matched against the HA population register to identify unregistered children. Rates for children aged 3-5 years 'in contact' with primary dental care services, whether CDS or GDS, were calculated at ward level. One calibrated examiner examined all 5-year-old children in Ellesmere Port and dmft scores were calculated at ward level. Ward deprivation was measured using the Jarman score. Bivariate linear regressions at ward level were performed in turn between: dmft and Jarman score; rates for 3-5-year-olds in contact with dental services and Jarman score; and dmft and rates for 3-5-year-olds in contact with dental services. RESULTS: A significant linear relationship was observed between dmft and Jarman score (P=0.02, R2 = 0.43). Significant inverse relationships were found between rates for 3-5-year-olds in contact with dental services and Jarman score (P=0.001, R2 = 0.67), and also between dmft and rates for 3-5-year-olds in contact with dental services (P=0.002, R2 = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: A strong inverse relationship was found between dental caries and contact with primary dental care services at electoral ward level. This relationship needs to be explored over a wider geographical area to establish if it is consistent and independent of deprivation.

Socioeconomic and geographical influences on primary dental care preferences in a population of young children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the socioeconomic profiles of children registered in the GDS, with those using the CDS services and unregistered children. Secondly to examine the effects of socioeconomic status on travelling to access primary dental care, and finally to map out the location of unregistered children in relation to primary dental care services. SETTING: The study was carried out in 1998 in Ellesmere Port in the North West of England. SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: The study population was all children younger than 6 years who used primary dental care services in, or were residents of, Ellesmere Port. The study population was categorized into those registered with a GDS dentist, those using CDS services and those unregistered by matching GDS and CDS data to the HA population register. Socioeconomic status was measured using the Super Profiles geodemographic classification. The relationship between service preferences and travelling to access primary dental care with socioeconomic status were compared using cross-tabulations and chi square tests. RESULTS: There was a significant socioeconomic trend evident in the use of dental services. Two thirds of those using CDS services came from the most deprived area types. Of those who were unregistered half lived in the most deprived area types compared with one third of those registered with the GDS. Those who travelled into Ellesmere Port to access primary dental care were significantly more likely to live in an affluent area. Unregistered patients were homogeneously spread across the town. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to match GDS and CDS data to the HA population register is essential to understand how dental services are used by the local population. Children from deprived areas are more likely to use the CDS and a service local to their homes, therefore primary dental care services for deprived communities have to be provided locally.

The identification of agreed criteria for referral following the dental inspection of children in the school setting.

AIM: To clarify the function of the school based dental inspection. OBJECTIVE: For representatives of the Community Dental Service, General Dental Service and Hospital Dental Service to identify an agreed set of criteria for the referral of children following school dental inspection. DESIGN: Qualitative research methodology used to establish a consensus for the inclusion of referral criteria following dental screening. SETTING: Ellesmere Port, Cheshire, England. MATERIALS: A Delphi technique was used to establish a consensus amongst the study participants on the inclusion of nine possible criteria for referral following dental screening. All participants scored each criterion in the range 1-9, with a score of 1 indicating that referral of individuals with the condition should definitely not take place, and a score of 9 indicating referral should definitely take place. Referral criteria were accepted only if they achieved a group median score of 7 or more, with an interquartile range of three scale points, with the lower value being no less than 7. RESULTS: Four of the nine possible criteria met the agreed group standard for inclusion: 'Sepsis', 'Caries in the secondary dentition', 'Overjet > 10 mm', and 'Registered & caries in the permanent dentition'. CONCLUSION: It is possible to agree clear criteria for the referral of children following the school dental inspection.