Dexamethasone with either granisetron or ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic surgery.

In a prospective randomized double-blind study, we compared the effectiveness of dexamethasone 8 mg with either granisetron 1 mg or ondansetron 4 mg in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Hundred ASA I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in the study and 84 patients completed it. Following induction of anesthesia, group I (n=42) received granisetron 1 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg, group II (n=42) received ondansetron 4 mg and dexamethasone 8 mg. Nausea and vomiting episodes, pain scores as well as side effects were recorded during the first hour and subsequently during the first 6 and 24 hours postoperatively. Satisfaction scores were obtained at discharge. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups during the 1st 24 hours following surgery in regards to pain scores, satisfaction and side effects manifestations. At 0-1 hour interval, 100% of patients in group I and 97.6% in group II had no vomiting. Total response (no moderate or severe nausea and no rescue antiemetics) was 83.3% in group I and 80.95% in group II, and metoclopramide was used in 7.1% of patients in both groups. At 1-6 hours interval, 97.6% of patients in group I and 100% in group II had no vomiting. Total response was 92.8% in group I and 90.9% in group II, and metoclopramide was used in 4.76% of patients in group I and 2.38% in group II. At 6-24 hours no vomiting occurred in 97.6% of patients in group I and 100% in group II. Total response was 95.2% in both groups, and metoclopramide was used in 2.38% of patients in both groups. In conclusion, the combination of dexamethasone 8 mg with either granisetron 1 mg or ondansetron 4 mg following induction of anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery showed no statistically significant difference in antiemetic efficacy with minimal side effects and excellent patient satisfaction.

Propofol is superior to thiopental for intubation without muscle relaxants.

PURPOSE: To compare intubating conditions and cardiovascular changes following induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation in patients receiving either lidocaine-remifentanil-propofol or lidocaine-remifentanil-thiopental prior to induction. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study 76 healthy adult patients were assigned to one of two groups: lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg(-1), remifentanil 2 mug.kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg.kg(-1) (Group P) or lidocaine 1.5 mg.kg(-1), remifentanil 2 mug.kg(-1) and thiopental 5 mg.kg(-1) (Group T). Ninety seconds after the administration of the hypnotic agent, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of ventilation, jaw relaxation, position of the vocal cords, and patient's response to intubation and slow inflation of the tracheal cuff. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were measured 45 sec after hypnotic agent administration, immediately after tracheal intubation, two and five minutes after intubation. RESULTS: Excellent intubating conditions were obtained in 84% of Group P patients and 50% of Group T patients (P < 0.05). The percentage decrease from baseline MAP was significantly higher in Group P than in Group T postinduction (27.4% +/- 11.6 vs 21.8% +/- 10.0) and immediately postintubation (19.0% +/- 16.7 vs 11.2% +/- 14.9). The percentage change from baseline HR was significantly higher in Group P than in Group T postinduction (13.8% +/- 9.7 vs 0.5% +/- 12.4), immediately postintubation (8.7% +/- 13.7 vs 2.1% +/- 13.1), and two minutes postintubation (7.04% +/- 14.3 vs 3.5% +/- 14.3). CONCLUSION: Lidocaine-remifentanil-propofol is superior to lidocaine-remifentanil-thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants. However, it induces more hypotension and bradycardia.