Genetic Variants Within the Erythroid Transcription Factor, KLF1, and Reduction of the Expression of Lutheran and Other Blood Group Antigens: Review of the In(Lu) Phenotype.

Erythroid-specific Krüppel-like factor 1, or KLF1, is an integral transcriptional activator for erythropoiesis. Genetic variants within KLF1 can result in a range of erythropoietic clinical phenotypes from benign to significant. The In(Lu) phenotype refers to changes in the quantitative expression of blood group-associated red cell surface molecules due to KLF1 variants which are otherwise clinically benign. These clinically benign KLF1 variants are associated with a reduced expression of 1 or more red cell membrane proteins/carbohydrates that carry blood group antigens for the LU (Lutheran), IN (Indian), P1PK, LW (Landsteiner-Wiener), KN (Knops), OK, RAPH, and I blood group systems. This is of significance during routine serologic blood typing when expression falls below the test sensitivity and therefore impacts on the ability to accurately detect the presence of affected blood group antigens. This is of clinical importance because the transfusion requirements for individuals with the In(Lu) phenotype differ from those of individuals that have a true Lunull phenotype. With this review, we summarize the current body of knowledge with regard to the In(Lu) phenotype and associated KLF1 variants. Our review also highlights discordant reports and provides insights for future research and management strategies. Serological heterogeneity in blood group expression of In(Lu) individuals has been shown, but studies are limited by the low prevalence of the phenotype and therefore the small numbers of samples. They are further limited by availability and inconsistent application of serological reagents and varying test algorithms. With the advent of genome sequence-based testing, an increasing list of In(Lu)-associated KLF1 variants is being revealed. The spectrum of effects on blood group expression due to these variants warrants further attention, and a consistent methodological approach of studies in larger cohorts is required. We propose that a recently reported testing framework of standardized serological studies, flow cytometry, and variant analysis be adopted; and that the international databases be curated to document KLF1 variability and the resultant In(Lu) red cell blood group expression. This will provide better classification of KLF1 variants affecting blood group expression and allow for phenotype prediction from genotype, accurate typing of In(Lu) individuals, and better transfusion management of related challenging transfusion scenarios.

Investigation of the variable In(Lu) phenotype caused by KLF1 variants.

INTRODUCTION: KLF1 is an essential transcriptional activator that drives erythropoiesis. KLF1 variants can result in the Inhibitor of Lutheran, or In(Lu), phenotype where red blood cells (RBCs) have reduced BCAM (LU) and CD44 (IN). Other RBC surface molecules also have changed expression; however, there is controversy in the literature regarding which are truly impacted. We aimed to investigate KLF1 variants in the Australian population. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In(Lu) samples were sourced through screening and through the RBC reference laboratory. Blood donor samples (8036) were screened to identify weakened/absent Lub antigen. Samples were genotyped by massively parallel sequencing, while surface carbohydrates and blood group molecules were assessed by flow cytometry. Hemoglobin (Hb) types were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Four of 8036 donors were identified to be In(Lu), and two previously identified In(Lu) samples were provided from the RBC reference laboratory. Five different KLF1 variants were identified; two were novel: c.954G>C/p.Trp318Cys and c.421C>T/p.Arg141*. BCAM and CD44 were reduced in all samples, consistent with previous reports. As a group, In(Lu) RBCs had reduced CD35 (KN), ICAM4 (LW), and CD147 (OK), and demonstrated increased binding of lectins ECA and SNAI. One In(Lu) sample had elevated HbF and another elevated HbA2. CONCLUSION: Different KLF1 variants may potentially produce variable phenotypes. A framework for investigating KLF1 variants and their phenotypic impact has been provided. In the future, given available international databases, further testing algorithms (as advocated here) will allow for correlation of phenotype with genotype and therefore accurately document this variability between KLF1 variants.