A phase II trial of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with triple-negative androgen receptor positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (UCBG 12-1).

BACKGROUND: Several expression array studies identified molecular apocrine breast cancer (BC) as a subtype that expresses androgen receptor (AR) but not estrogen receptor α. We carried out a multicentre single-arm phase II trial in women with AR-positive, estrogen, progesterone receptor and HER2-negative (triple-negative) metastatic or inoperable locally advanced BC to assess the efficacy and safety of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a metastatic or locally advanced, centrally reviewed, triple-negative and AR-positive (≥10% by immunohistochemistry, IHC) BC were eligible. Any number of previous lines of chemotherapy was allowed. AA (1000 mg) was administered once a day with prednisone (5 mg) twice a day until disease progression or intolerance. The primary end point was clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 6 months defined as the proportion of patients presenting a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥6 months. Secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients from 27 centres consented for IHC central review. Of the 138 patients with sufficient tissue available, 53 (37.6%) were AR-positive and triple-negative, and 34 of them were included from July 2013 to December 2014. Thirty patients were eligible and evaluable for the primary end point. The 6-month CBR was 20.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 7.7%-38.6%], including 1 CR and 5 SD ≥6 months, 5 of them still being under treatment at the time of analysis (6.4+, 9.2+, 14.5+, 17.6+, 23.4+ months). The ORR was 6.7% (95% CI 0.8%-22.1%). The median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 1.7%-5.4%). Fatigue, hypertension, hypokalaemia and nausea were the most common drug-related adverse events; the majority of them being grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: AA plus prednisone treatment is beneficial for some patients with molecular apocrine tumours and five patients are still on treatment. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT01842321.

Long-Term Survivor with Intrathecal and Intravenous Trastuzumab Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

We report the case of a woman with metastatic breast cancer receiving intrathecal trastuzumab (and intravenous trastuzumab for more than 7 years). She was diagnosed in 2001 with a duct invasive breast cancer T3N1M0 HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-positive +++ HR (hormone receptor) -negative. She received chemotherapy and then she had a mastectomy. Several metastases were discovered and treated from 2003 to 2008 with chemotherapy. In March 2010, brain metastases and a leptomeningeal carcinomatosis from her HER2-positive breast cancer appeared. From that moment on she received intravenous trastuzumab (6 mg/kg) every 3 weeks, intrathecal trastuzumab (21 mg) weekly for 16 injections and lapatinib. Intrathecal trastuzumab was stopped because of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) clearing. Intrathecal trastuzumab was injected again from December 2013 for 14 injections. The relevance of treating leptomeningeal carcinomatosis with intrathecal trastuzumab administration is shown through this case report.

cPRA Increases With DQA, DPA, and DPB Unacceptable Antigens in the Canadian cPRA Calculator.

A calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) estimates the percentage of donors with unacceptable antigens (UA) for a recipient. cPRA may be underestimated in transplant candidates with UA to DQA, DPA, and DPB if these are not included in the calculation program. To serve the National Canadian Transplant Programs, a cPRA calculator was developed with complete molecular typing for all donors at HLA-A, B, C, DRB1, DRB3/4/5, DQA1, DQB1, DPA1, and DPB1, all resolved to serologic equivalents. The prevalence of UA at DQA, DPA and DPB was evaluated in a sensitized regional population. The impact of adding these additional UA to cPRA was calculated alone and in combination, and compared to the baseline cPRA for UA at A, B, C, DR, DR51/52/53, and DQ. Of 740 sensitized transplant candidates, 18% of total and 32% with cPRA≥95% had DQA UA. Twenty-seven percent of total and 54% with cPRA≥95% had DPB UA. Of 280/740 subjects with these UA, 36/280 (13%) had cPRA increase of >20% when they were included, 7% increased cPRA to ≥80% and 6% to ≥95%. Inclusion of DQA, DPA, and DPB UA in Canadian cPRA calculations improves the accuracy of cPRA where these are relevant in allocation.

A phase III adjuvant randomised trial of 6 cycles of 5-fluorouracil-epirubicine-cyclophosphamide (FEC100) versus 4 FEC 100 followed by 4 Taxol (FEC-T) in node positive breast cancer patients (Trial B2000).

BACKGROUND: Standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for patients with node positive (N+) breast cancer consisted of anthracycline followed by taxane. The European Association for Research in Oncology embarked in 2000 on a phase III trial comparing 6 cycles of FEC100 versus 4 FEC100 followed by 4 Taxol. Primary end-point was disease free survival. Secondary end-points were overall survival, local recurrence free interval, metastases free interval and safety. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between March 2000 and December 2002, 837 patients were randomised between 6FEC100 for 6 cycles (417patients) or FEC100 for 4 cycles then Taxol 175mg/m(2)/3 weeks for 4 cycles (4FEC100-4T) (420 patients). One thousand patients had been planned initially but the trial was closed earlier due to slow accrual. RESULTS: Hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.99 for disease-free survival (DFS) (95%CI: 0.77-1.26; p=0.91), and 0.85 for overall survival (OS) (95%CI: 0.62-1.15; p=0.29). Nine-year DFS were 62.9% versus 62.5% for 6FEC100 and 4FEC100-4T, respectively. Nine-year OS were 73.9% versus 77% for 6FEC100 and 4FEC100-4T, respectively. Toxicity analyses based on 803 evaluable patients showed that overall grade 3-4 toxicities were similar in both arms (63% versus 58% for 6FEC100 arm and 4FEC100-4T arm, respectively; p=0.16). CONCLUSION: In this trial replacing the last 2 FEC100 cycles of 6FEC100 regimen by 4 Taxol does not lead to a discernable DFS or OS advantage. The lack of a significant difference between the randomised treatment arms may however be due to a lack of power of this trial to detect small, yet clinically worthwhile, treatment benefits.

Impact of primary tumour resection on survival of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases treated by chemotherapy: results from the multicenter, randomised trial Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9601.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of primary tumour resection on overall survival (OS) of patients diagnosed with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC). DESIGN: Among the 294 patients with non-resectable colorectal metastases enrolled in the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 phase III trial, which compared different first-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens, 216 patients (73%) presented with synchronous metastases at study entry and constituted the present study population. Potential baseline prognostic variables including prior primary tumour resection were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS curves were compared with the logrank test. RESULTS: Among the 216 patients with stage IV CRC (median follow-up, 33 months), 156 patients (72%) had undergone resection of their primary tumour prior to study entry. The resection and non-resection groups did not differ for baseline characteristics except for primary tumour location (rectum, 14% versus 35%; p=0.0006). In multivariate analysis, resection of the primary was the strongest independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 0.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-0.8; p=0.0002) and OS (HR, 0.4; CI, 0.3-0.6; p<0.0001). Both median PFS (5.1 [4.6-5.6] versus 2.9 [2.2-4.1] months; p=0.001) and OS (16.3 [13.7-19.2] versus 9.6 [7.4-12.5]; p<0.0001) were significantly higher in the resection group. These differences in patient survival were maintained after exclusion of patients with rectal primary (n=43). CONCLUSION: Resection of the primary tumour may be associated with longer PFS and OS in patients with stage IV CRC starting first-line, single-agent chemotherapy.

Docetaxel combined with irinotecan or 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer: a randomised phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and irinotecan chemotherapy have shown good efficacy in the treatment of advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. This randomised phase II study evaluated the efficacy and toxicity profile of two non-platinum docetaxel-based doublet regimens in advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer were randomised to receive either 3-weekly DI (docetaxel 60 mg m(-2) plus irinotecan 250 mg m(-2) (Day 1)) or 3-weekly DF (docetaxel 85 mg m(-2) (Day 1) followed by 5-fluorouracil 750 mg m(-2) per day as a continuous infusion (Days 1-5)). RESULTS: A total of 85 patients received DI (n=42) or DF (n=43). The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). The ORR and time to progression (TTP) in the evaluable population (n=65) were 37.5% (DI) vs 33.3% (DF), and 4.2 months vs 4.4 months, respectively. In the intent-to-treat population, the observed ORR, TTP and median overall survival were similar between the two groups. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia and diarrhoea were more frequent in the DI arm as compared with the DF arm (83.3% vs 69.8%, 40.5% vs 18.6%, and 42.9% vs 16.3%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both docetaxel-based doublet regimens show comparable efficacy; however, the DF regimen was associated with a better toxicity profile and is an alternative treatment option for patients in whom platinum-based regimens are unsuitable.

[Contribution of dynamic interpretation of CA 125 measurements to the understanding of an atypical clinical case]. / Contribution de l'interprétation dynamique du CA 125 dans la compréhension d'un cas clinique atypique.

The dynamic interpretation of the serum concentrations of markers is frequently used to calculate biological indicators of therapeutic efficiency and relapse. But analysis of marker kinetics can also help improve our understanding of the natural history of different types of cancer and their evolution under treatment. This application is illustrated by an analysis of CA 125 kinetics measured in a patient with stage III ovarian cancer treated with multiple lines of chemotherapy and who had a survival time of 9 years.

[Early detection of leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: validation of CA 15-3 measurement in cerebrospinal fluid]. / Détection précoce des métastases leptoméningées chez les patientes atteintes de cancer du sein métastatique: validation du dosage du CA 15-3 dans le liquide céphalorachidien.

Fifteen per cent of metastatic breast cancer will develop symptomatic leptomeningeal metastases. The introduction of trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy has improved the response rates of survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2. Although previous studies are retrospective and of limited number, involving small study groups and different types of patient management, several authors have reported a 30% incidence of leptomeningeal metastases in patients with metastatic breast cancer overexpressing HER2 who were treated with trastuzumab, while 70 to 80% of cases of the disease were controlled systemically. In order to improve control of the disease at the level of the central nervous system (CNS), routine detection of leptomeningeal metastases in high-risk patients could be offered. CA 15-3 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) detection might be useful in helping to diagnose CNS metastases, particularly where cytology results are negative--which applies to 30% of cases--because tumor markers are more sensitive in detecting the tumor process. Our study validate CA 15-3 measurement in CSF and reference values were given.

Randomised trial comparing three different schedules of infusional 5FU and raltitrexed alone as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Final results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 trial.

LV5FU2 with high-dose leucovorin (LV), weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5FU) (AIO schedule) and raltitrexed have been demonstrated to be active agents in first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. We performed a 4-arm randomised trial to compare (1) a low-dose intravenous bolus of LV (20 mg/m2), followed by an intravenous bolus of 5FU (400 mg/m2), followed by a 22-hour continuous infusion of 5FU (600 mg/m2) on day 1 and day 2/2 weeks (ldLV5FU2 arm), (2) a weekly continuous infusion of high-dose 5FU (2.6 g/m2/week) for 6 weeks followed by a rest week (HD-FU arm) and (3) raltitrexed (Tomudex arm; 3 mg/m2/3 weeks) to standard LV5FU2. From 1997 to 2001, 294 patients were included. The 4 arms were well balanced for sex ratio, age, WHO performance status, the primary tumour site and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment was stopped due to low accrual. Two toxicity-related deaths were observed in the Tomudex arm. The treatments gave rise to different rates of grade 3-4 neutropenia (3, 4, 11 and 14% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively, p = 0.028), leucopenia and vomiting. At least one episode of grade 3-4 toxicity was observed in 27, 25, 38 and 47% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.016). An objective response was observed in 28, 21, 22 and 10% of the patients in the LV5FU2, ldLV5FU2, HD-FU and Tomudex arms, respectively (p = 0.04). Progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients in the Tomudex arm was statistically lower compared to that of patients treated with LV5FU2 or ldLV5FU2 (combined group; p = 0.013, log rank test). In conclusion, Tomudex is more toxic and yields shorter PFS than infusional 5FU. Despite the early closure of the study and the lack of power of the comparison, it seems that ldLV5FU2 could be considered as an active, easier and less expensive option for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer compared to classic LV5FU2 or weekly HD-FU.

Effects of permeability transition inhibition and decrease in cytochrome c content on doxorubicin toxicity in K562 cells.

As mitochondria play a key role in the commitment to cell death, we have investigated the mitochondrial consequences of resistance to doxorubicin (DOX) in K562 cells. We found that the permeability transition pore (PTP) inhibitor cyclosporine A (CsA) failed to inhibit PTP opening in the resistant clone. Moreover, the Ca2+ loading capacity in the resistant clone was identical to that observed in the parent cells in the presence of CsA, suggesting that the PTP was already inhibited in a CsA-like manner in the resistant cells. In agreement with this proposal, the mitochondrial target of CsA cyclophilin D (CyD) decreased by half in the resistant cells. The levels of adenine nucleotide translocator, voltage anion-dependent channel, Bax, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, AIF and Smac/Diablo, were similar in both cell lines, whereas cytochrome c content was divided by three in the resistant cells. Since P-glycoprotein inhibition did not restore DOX toxicity in the resistant cells, while DOX-induced cell death in the parent cells was prevented by either PTP inhibition or siRNA-induced decrease in cytochrome c content, we conclude that the inhibition of PTP opening and the decrease in cytochrome c content participate in the mechanism that makes K562 cells resistant to DOX.

[Randomised phase III trial of fotemustine versus fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation in cerebral metastases of melanoma]. / Essai de phase III randomisé comparant la fotémustine seule ou associée à une irradiation encéphalique dans les métastases cérébrales de mélanome.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this prospective multicenter randomised phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients (instead of the 106 planned patients; study was stopped after the interim analysis) were randomised receiving either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine and whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg m(-2) on day 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5-week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, a concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at the total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/d(-1), days 1-5, 3 consecutive weeks). RESULTS: Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in brain response (arm A: 7.4%, B: 10.0%) or control rates (objective response plus stable disease) after seven weeks (arm A: 30%, B: 47%) and overall survival (arm A: 86d, B: 105d). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to brain progression (p = 0.028, Wilcoxon test). CONCLUSION: Fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to brain progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared to fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.

A prospective randomized multicentre phase III trial of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in cerebral metastases of malignant melanoma.

The main objective of this prospective multicentre randomized phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation with fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma cerebral metastases. Seventy-six patients were randomized to receive either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5 week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at a total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/day on days 1-5 for three consecutive weeks). Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in cerebral response (arm A, 7.4%, arm B, 10.0%) or control rates (objective responses plus stable disease) after 7 weeks (arm A, 30%; arm B, 47%) or in overall survival (arm A, 86 days; arm B, 105 days). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to cerebral progression (P = 0.028, Wilcoxon test). In conclusion, fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to cerebral progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared with fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.

Randomized multicenter phase II study comparing a combination of fluorouracil and folinic acid and alternating irinotecan and oxaliplatin with oxaliplatin and irinotecan in fluorouracil-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess antitumor activity and safety of two regimens in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with proven fluorouracil (5-FU) resistance in a randomized phase II study: 5-FU/folinic acid (FA) combined with alternating irinotecan (also called CPT-11) and oxaliplatin (FC/FO tritherapy), and an oxaliplatin/irinotecan (OC) combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients were treated: arm FC/FO (32 patients) received, every 4 weeks, FA 200 mg/m(2) followed by a 400-mg/m(2) 5-FU bolus injection, then a 600-mg/m(2) continuous infusion of 5-FU on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks administered alternately with irinotecan (180 mg/m(2) on day 1) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on day 15). Arm OC (30 patients) received oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. RESULTS: In an intent-to-treat analysis, two partial responses lasting 10.7 and 16 months were observed with the tritherapy regimen, and seven (median duration, 11 months; range, 10.6 to 11.4 months) were observed with the bitherapy regimen. Median progression-free and overall survival times were 8.2 and 9.8 months, respectively, in the FC/FO arm and 8.5 and 12.3 months, respectively, in the OC arm. Main grade 3/4 toxicities were, respectively, neutropenia, 53% and 47%; febrile neutropenia, 13% and 3%; diarrhea, 19% and 10%; vomiting, 6% and 13%; and neurosensory toxicity, 3% and 3%. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: The every-3-weeks OC combination is safe and active in advanced 5-FU-resistant CRC patients. The lower activity data seen with the tritherapy regimen may be related to the lower dose intensities of irinotecan and oxaliplatin in this schedule.

Rotenone inhibits the mitochondrial permeability transition-induced cell death in U937 and KB cells.

The permeability transition pore (PTP) is a mitochondrial inner membrane Ca(2+)-sensitive channel that plays a key role in different models of cell death. Because functional links between the PTP and the respiratory chain complex I have been reported, we have investigated the effects of rotenone on PTP regulation in U937 and KB cells. We show that rotenone was more potent than cyclosporin A at inhibiting Ca(2+)-induced PTP opening in digitonin-permeabilized cells energized with succinate. Consistent with PTP regulation by electron flux through complex I, the effect of rotenone persisted after oxidation of pyridine nucleotides by duroquinone. tert-butyl hydroperoxide induced PTP opening in intact cells (as shown by mitochondrial permeabilization to calcein and cobalt), as well as cytochrome c release and cell death. All these events were prevented by rotenone or cyclosporin A. These data demonstrate that respiratory chain complex I plays a key role in PTP regulation in vivo and confirm the importance of PTP opening in the commitment to cell death.

The integration of anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.

Since the publication of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) protocol 111 in 1996, and the results of the Arbeitgemeinschaft Gyna kologische Onkologie (AGO) trial Ovar-3 and the GOG protocol 158, the combination of platinum and paclitaxel has been adopted as the standard therapy in advanced ovarian cancer. One option for achieving further progress in the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer might be the addition of noncross-resistant drugs to the two-drug regimen. Meta-analysis showed a survival benefit for platinum-anthracycline based combinations as compared to platinum-based combinations without anthracyclines. An AGO phase I/II trial compared epirubicin in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in untreated patients with gynecological malignancies. Based on the results of this study a randomized phase III trial together with the French GINECO group was conducted. The trial started 11/97 and was closed 11/99. All 1281 patients were randomized. Currently, 1132 end-of-therapy reports have been issued. Nine hundred eighty nine (87%) patients completed six cycles of treatment. Treatment and toxicity data are available for these patients. Three hundred thirty five patients had a measurable residual tumor after initial debulking surgery. Response data of 228 patients (111 ET-Carbo, 117 Carbo-T) are available.

Can interleukin-2 reverse anthracyclin chemoresistance in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients. Results of a prospective phase II clinical trial.

Anthracyclin-based chemotherapy is the most efficient chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Development of anthracyclin chemoresistance has been widely documented. In a previous clinical trial, we evaluated a possible reversal of anthracyclin chemoresistance after exposure to subcutaneous IL-2. The current phase II clinical study entered 17 proven metastatic STS patients, refractory to anthracyclin chemotherapy, who received IL-2, and subsequent anthracyclin-based chemotherapy. Subcutaneous IL-2 was administered at 18 million Units/day, 5 days a week for two consecutive weeks. Treatment was administered safely at the full dose for 16 out of 17 patients, and toxicity was mild. One patient had treatment stopped because of rapidly progressive disease. As soon as patients met biological and clinical criteria, chemotherapy was administered. The median delay was 12 days (2-23) from the end of IL-2 administration. Only 13 patients received anthracyclin chemotherapy after IL-2. The other 4 patients did not receive chemotherapy for progressive disease. One partial response was observed out of 13 evaluable patients (7.7% overall response, 95% confidence interval: 0.2 to 36). The overall response rate was 5.9% (95% CI: 0.15 to 29), so the study was stopped due to lack of efficacy. In previous and current studies, a few patients have developed restored anthracyclin chemosensitivity following exposure to IL-2. No conclusive evidence of IL-2 chemoresistance reversal was obtained from this study. Further investigations need to be performed with perhaps a larger group of more carefully selected patients using a different schedule and sequence of combined cytokines and chemotherapy.

Randomized comparison of prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment versus no prophylactic antidiarrheal treatment in patients receiving CPT-11 (irinotecan) for advanced 5-FU-resistant colorectal cancer: an open-label multicenter phase II study.

Delayed diarrhea is the main toxicity of irinotecan at the currently recommended dose of 350 mg/m2 30-minute intravenous infusion, once every 3 weeks. This phase II, multicenter, open-label, randomized study was primarily designed to evaluate the effect of a 15-day Tiorfan (racecadotril) treatment on the incidence and severity of irinotecan-induced delayed diarrhea. One hundred thirty-six patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed to respond to a 5-fluorouracil-based treatment received 714 cycles of irinotecan. The patients were randomly allocated either to group A (68 patients) and received Tiorfan (300 mg/day) from D0 to D15 or to group B (68 patients) with no prophylactic treatment. Delayed diarrhea occurred in 197 of 355 cycles (55%) in Group A and 203 of 344 cycles (59%) in Group B. grade III-IV diarrhea was reported in 17 of 40 compliant patients (42%) in group A and 31 of 68 evaluable patients (45%) in group B. No difference was observed between the two groups for delayed diarrhea characteristics, incidence, or severity. The response rate in 99 evaluable patients was 12.1% (6.4%-20.2%). This study has shown that Tiorfan given prophylactically at 300 mg/day has no effect on delayed diarrhea.

Response of chemosensitive and chemoresistant leukemic cell lines to drug therapy: simultaneous assessment of proliferation, apoptosis, and necrosis.

BACKGROUND: The balance between cell proliferation and drug-induced cell death by apoptosis or necrosis plays a major role in determining response to chemotherapy. Commonly-used DNA analysis methods cannot study both parameters simultaneously. A new approach described here combines a green fluorescent membrane-intercalating dye (PKH67) with Hoechst 33342 or annexin V and propidium iodide, to allow simultaneous assessment of cell division, cell cycle status, apoptosis, and necrosis, respectively. METHODS: To test this approach, we used cultured K562 leukemic cell lines which are drug-sensitive (K562S) or drug-resistant (K562R) by virtue of whether they lack or exhibit expression, respectively, of the gp-170 (PGP) glycoprotein pump involved in multidrug resistance. RESULTS: We found that: 1) PKH67 fluorescence intensity decreases proportionately to number of cell divisions, 2) labeling with PKH67 does not alter either cell cycle distribution, as assessed by vital DNA staining with Hoechst 33342, or cell growth, and 3) using a simple threshold analysis method suitable for real-time sorting decisions, subpopulations of proliferating cells present at initial levels of >/= 10% can readily be detected after two cell division times, based on decreased PKH67 intensity. Finally, we demonstrated that after treatment of an admixture of K562S and K562R with vincristine, triple-labeling with PKH67, annexin V, and propidium iodide can be used to identify and sort those cells which remain not only viable (nonnecrotic, nonapoptotic) but actively dividing (decreased PKH67 intensity) in the presence of drug. CONCLUSIONS: Although the studies described here were carried out in a model system using cells having known drug resistance phenotypes, we expect that the methods described will be useful in ex vivo studies of clinical leukemic specimens designed to identify the role played by specific chemoresistance proteins and mechanisms in therapeutic outcomes for individual patients.

Optimized fluorescent probe combinations for evaluation of proliferation and necrosis in anthracycline-treated leukaemic cell lines.

Proliferation and multidrug resistance status are key predictors of therapeutic outcome in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Anthracyclines such as daunorubicin (DNR) are typically used to treat AML and can induce drug resistance. The goal of the studies described here was to select a combination of fluorescent probes that could be used in combination with flow cytometry to monitor cell proliferation vs. cell death/necrosis as a function of anthracycline uptake. Propidium iodide (PI), the most commonly used marker of membrane integrity, cannot be used to evaluate necrosis in DNR-containing cells because of spectral overlap. A membrane integrity probe compatible with the use of a dye dilution method using PKH67 to study cell proliferation was also selected. The results show that DAPI and Cascade Blue (CB), like PI, were able to detect necrotic cells when no DNR was present, although CB gave less resolution between viable and necrotic cells than PI or DAPI. In the presence of DNR, DAPI cannot be used owing to the fluorescence quenching by DNR. However, it was found that a combination of DNR, CB, and PKH67 allows simultaneous identification of chemoresistant cells, based on reduced DNR accumulation, necrotic cells based on CB incorporation, and proliferating cells based on partitioning of PKH67 fluorescence between daughter cells. It was also found that unless a marker of necrosis is used in combination with the dye dilution assay, a moderate decrease of fluorescence as a result of necrosis may be incorrectly interpreted as proliferation.

First-line high-dose sequential chemotherapy with rG-CSF and repeated blood stem cell transplantation in untreated inflammatory breast cancer: toxicity and response (PEGASE 02 trial).

Despite the generalization of induction chemotherapy and a better outcome for chemosensitive diseases, the prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is still poor. In this work, we evaluate response and toxicity of high-dose sequential chemotherapy with repeated blood stem cell (BSC) transplantation administered as initial treatment in 100 women with non-metastatic IBC. Ninety-five patients (five patients were evaluated as non-eligible) of median age 46 years (range 26-56) received four cycles of chemotherapy associating: cyclophosphamide (C) 6 g m(-2) - doxorubicin (D) 75 mg m(-2) cycle 1, C: 3 g m(-2) - D: 75 mg m(-2) cycle 2, C: 3 g m(-2) - D: 75 mg m(-2) - 5 FU 2500 mg m(-2) cycle 3 and 4. BSC were collected after cycle 1 or 2 and reinfused after cycle 3 and 4. rG-CSF was administered after the four cycles. Mastectomy and radiotherapy were planned after chemotherapy completion. Pathological response was considered as the first end point of this trial. A total of 366 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Eighty-seven patients completed the four cycles and relative dose intensity was respectively 0.97 (range 0.4-1.04) and 0.96 (range 0.25-1.05) for C and D. Main toxicity was haematological with febrile neutropenia ranging from 26% to 51% of cycles; one death occurred during aplasia. Clinical response rate was 90% +/- 6%. Eighty-six patients underwent mastectomy in a median of 3.5 months (range 3-9) after the first cycle of chemotherapy; pathological complete response rate in breast was 32% +/- 10%. All patients were eligible to receive additional radiotherapy. High-dose chemotherapy with repeated BSC transplantation is feasible with acceptable toxicity in IBC. Pathological response rate is encouraging but has to be confirmed by final outcome.