[What are the obstacles to drawing up a death certificate in a home setting ? A survey of doctors in Normandy]. / Quels freins à l'établissement du certificat de décès à domicile ? Enquête auprès de médecins sur le territoire de Normandie.

INTRODUCTION: Drafting a death certificate is an obligation for any physician called upon to note a death. It has a legal and epidemiological impact. The objective of this study is to highlight the obstacles encountered by professionals when this process takes place in a home setting. METHOD: A study was carried out by means of a questionnaire sent to doctors in the Normandy region. RESULTS: One fifth (20%) of the general practitioners (GPs), 25% of the SAMU practitioners (intervening in mobile emergency throughout the country), 27.3% of SOS doctors (intervening 24 hours a day in the deceased person's home in the absence of a GP) stated that they had at least once refused to establish a death certificate. Only 36.4% of SOS doctors, 62.5% of emergency physicians and 41% of GPs considered the drafting of a death certificate to be one of their mandatory missions. No less than 17% of GPs, 25% of SAMU doctors and 9% of SOS doctors stated that due to lack of time, they were occasionally unable to travel to fill out a death certificate, a factor causing delays that were detrimental, especially for the surviving relatives. We highlighted several other obstacles to the completion of death certificates: the difficulty of completing them accurately without knowledge of the deceased person's history, possible inability of professionals on tight schedules to deal with unforeseen requests and, more rarely, the issues raised by an absence of remuneration. CONCLUSION: Our study highlights major obstacles in the preparation of death certificates, obstacles that should be taken into consideration insofar as they affect the quality of the data collected, and entail ethical challenges.

[A difficult transition from childhood to adult healthcare: the case of epilepsy]. / Le difficile passage à l'âge adulte en matière de soins : l'exemple de l'épilepsie.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze modalities of the transition from pediatric to adult epilepsy care and patients' acquisition of autonomy. METHOD: This study was conducted using semidirected interviews composed of three major parts: the patient's criteria of transition toward adult healthcare (factors taken into account, anticipation, the patient's opinion, etc.), conditions (teamwork with the neurologists, transmission of the medical record, continuity of health care, etc.), and the role played by social workers and psychologists. We interviewed 10 doctors belonging to six major Parisian hospital units involved in the monitoring of children and adolescents with epilepsy and working in Pediatric Neurology Departments of the Île-de-France region. RESULTS: For most of the doctors, reaching 18 years of age was the major argument taken into account to consider transition to adult care. According to the doctors interviewed, parents are generally worried when their child has to find another doctor (7/10). According to eight out of 10 doctors, the neurologist is selected to take over. The doctors recognize the importance of psychologists and social workers even if they are not always included. The process by which the patient gains autonomy depends a great deal on the role played by the pediatricians and parents, although some parents are very protective. This behavior weakens the patient's capacity for autonomy and it varies according to the degree of his or her physical and/or neurological disabilities. Furthermore, developing autonomy requires interdisciplinary work that is not yet fully in place. CONCLUSION: The lack of structures well-adapted to the uniqueness of each patient and the lack of coordination between the various institutions do not favor the acquisition of autonomy. A network that could efficiently respond to the needs of epileptic patients as well as medical care tailored to adolescents would be the answer to this dilemma.

[Breast cancer screening program in France: for optimization of the information]. / Dépistage organisé du cancer du sein en France : pour une optimisation de l'information.

BACKGROUND: Based on international and national recommendations, organized breast cancer screening in France raises questions of medical ethics built around the key concepts of individual autonomy and public health policy. Because of the evolving knowledge, professionals and institutions involved in the program must review the ethical values associated with this medical practice. METHODS: The ethical aspects of organized breast cancer screening were studied. In response to newly acquired knowledge highlighted by a review of texts governing this practice in France, proposals for changes resulting from reflections of a working group coordinated by the National Cancer Institute are presented. RESULTS: Ethical issues raised by screening must find expression in the general principles of the program's organization: acceptability of screening, efficiency, adverse effects, equity of access, free care…, but also at different stages of the procedure: information delivery, first and second invitations, refusal of further diagnostic investigation… CONCLUSION: A better match between breast cancer screening and recently developed knowledge requires optimal information delivery to women targeted by the program as well as a stronger role for the referring healthcare professional.

[Refusal of care faced by case manager from elderly persons in complex situation: cross perspectives]. / Refus de soins opposés aux gestionnaires de cas par des personnes âgées en situation médico-sociale complexe : regards croisés.

PURPOSE: Case management is a new professional field in France. It is addressed to elderly persons living in community whose situation is regarded as particularly complex. Case managers have to assess needs and coordinate necessary services. One common criteria of complexity is refusal of care. The objective of this study is to compare the words of users with those of case managers about refusal of care, in order to understand its meaning, professionals' attitudes and ethical challenges. METHODS: Two researchers have cooperated on this qualitative research: the first one, anthropologist, interviewed 19 individuals, and 11 of their caregivers. The second one, geriatrician and researcher in medical ethics, lead four focus groups gathering a total of 18 case managers. RESULTS: Refusal of care often is the result of the will of preserving one's identity, compromised by illness. Individuals seek control on their life. Facing this behaviour, case managers try to secure the individual, by establishing a personal relationship that respects their choices, even if care has to be delayed. Refusal of care may sometimes disclose a desire to vanish, in front of which professionals meet their own limits. CONCLUSION: To recognise an elderly person that refuses care as a unique individual who can make choices secure his identity, and allow him to change.

[Why patient consent is not to be neglected?]. / Pourquoi le consentement des patients ne doit-il pas être banalisé?

Observation of medical practices still show that, in some institutions, obtaining consent could be in the mode of a trivialization, or even some administrative automaticity. To ensure a truly informed choice, this article explains why the information in the sensitive field of reproductive medicine and perinatology should remain an act of care and relationship. It outlines why medical information issued to couples must take into account not only validated data, but also the doubts and uncertainties. This is especially true when risk management because the meaning we give to the acceptance of risk is not simply the result of a calcul of probability but also the result of a social construction. All signed consent and collected outside of such an approach to quality and completeness of the information would be considered questionable.

Fetal reduction of triplet pregnancy: one or two?

OBJECTIVE: To review outcomes following reductions in trichorionic triplet pregnancies at our institution. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of the outcome of trichorionic triamniotic triplets reduced to singletons (group I, n = 44) or twins (group II, n = 136) at 10 and 12 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Reduction to one or two was based on parent's preference, hence unrelated to any specific obstetrical or maternal issue. Early fetal loss rate (e.g. <24 weeks) was 9.1% in group I versus 5.1% in group II (p = 0.83). In group I, the take-home baby rate was 86.4% versus 91.9% in group II (p = 0.8). In group I, 17.5% of the women gave birth between 33 and 36(+6) weeks of gestation versus 40.6% in group II (p = 0.026). Delivery beyond 37 weeks was 72.5% in group I and 46.9% in group II (p = 0.01). Intrauterine growth restriction rate was 27.0% in group I versus 45.0% in group II (p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Reduction to one rather than two fetuses led to significantly higher term delivery rate without significant differences in fetal loss rate or take-home baby rate.

[Conditions of decision making of admission or non-admission in surgical intensive care unit]. / Conditions de prise de décision d'admission ou de non admission en réanimation chirurgicale.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the condition of the decision-making of admission and non-admission in intensive care unit. STUDY DESIGN: Non-interventional observational cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of declarative terms of decision-making of patients admitted or denied in a surgical intensive care unit. The decision-making in the two admitted or not admitted troops was compared. RESULTS: That it is during a non-admission (149 decisions) or of an admission (149 decisions), the decision-making process was not very different. The instruction of the files was regarded as collegial in nearly 80% of the cases by the intensivist in load. The dialogue precedent the decision utilized generally several speakers but who could be residents. The participation of the patient and/or his close relations, as that of the ancillary medical personnel was rare. No person of confidence or anticipated directive was quoted. More than 50% of the decisions were taken within a time lower than 30 minutes. The decisions of non-admission were considered to be more difficult than the decisions of admission. Traceability was not automatically given. CONCLUSION: Thus, this study shows that in its current form the intensivists of the service estimate that in the majority of the cases the instruction of the files was collegial. However, the conditions of seniorisation of the decision, the collection of opinion of the patient and/or his close relations and the traceability are tracks of improvement to be implemented in certain circumstances of admission or non-admission.

Impact of an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices in the intensive care unit.

PURPOSE: Since the 2005 French law on end of life and patients' rights, it is unclear whether practices have evolved. We investigated whether an intensive communication strategy based on this law would influence practices in terms of withholding and withdrawing treatment (WWT), and outcome of patients hospitalised in intensive care (ICU). METHODS: This was a single-centre, two-period study performed before and after the 2005 law. Between these periods, an intensive strategy for communication was developed and implemented, comprising regular meetings and modalities for WWT. We examined medical records of all patients who died in the ICU or in hospital during both periods. RESULTS: In total, out of 2,478 patients admitted in period 1, 678 (27%) died in the ICU and 823/2,940 (28%) in period 2. In period 1, among patients who died in the ICU, 45% died subsequent to a decision to WWT versus 85% in period 2 (p < 0.01). Among these, median time delay between ICU admission and initiation of decision-making process was significantly different (6-7 days in period 1 vs. 3-5 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Similarly, median time from admission to actual WWT decision was significantly shorter in period 2 (11-13 days in period 1 vs. 4-6 days in period 2, p < 0.05). Finally, median time from admission to death in the ICU subsequent to a decision to WWT was 13-15 days in period 1 versus 7-8 days in period 2, p < 0.05. Reasons for WWT were not significantly different between periods. CONCLUSION: Intensive communication brings about quicker end-of-life decision-making in the ICU. The new law has the advantage of providing a legal framework.

Suffering among carers working in critical care can be reduced by an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices.

PURPOSE: Burnout syndrome (BOS) has frequently been reported in healthcare workers, and precipitating factors include communication problems in the workplace and stress related to end-of-life situations. We evaluated the effect of an intensive communication strategy on BOS among caregivers working in intensive care (ICU). METHODS: Longitudinal, monocentric, before-and-after, interventional study. BOS was evaluated using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and depression using the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in 2007 (period 1) and 2009 (period 2). Between periods, an intensive communication strategy on end-of-life practices was implemented, based on improved organisation, better communication, and regular staff meetings. RESULTS: Among 62 caregivers in the ICU, 53 (85%) responded to both questionnaires in period 1 and 49 (79%) in period 2. We observed a significant difference between periods in all three components of the MBI (emotional exhaustion, p = 0.04; depersonalization p = 0.04; personal accomplishment, p = 0.01). MBI classified burnout as severe in 15 (28%) caregivers in period 1 versus 7 (14%) in period 2, p < 0.01, corresponding to a 50% risk reduction. Symptoms of depression as evaluated by the CES-D were present in 9 (17%) caregivers in period 1 versus 3 (6%) in period 2, p < 0.05, corresponding to a risk reduction of almost 60%. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an active, intensive communication strategy regarding end-of-life care in the ICU was associated with a significant reduction in the rate of burnout syndrome and depression in a stable population of caregiving staff.

[Can or must the patient participate to risk management in radiotherapy?]. / Le patient peut-il et doit-il participer à la gestion des risques en radiothérapie ?

PURPOSE: The present study aimed at analyzing if patient participation constitutes a promising way of improvement of patient safety, or not. The hypothesis is that patient participation is a means to develop a safety culture based on the cooperation between patients and healthcare providers, to improve patients' satisfaction and to reduce the costs associated to adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A half-day session was organized on this theme during a training of radiotherapy professionals on risk management. Professionals were first distributed in three subgroups according to their specialty (radiation oncologists, radiation physicists and medical technicians), and had to work on four main questions relating to participation, among which the collection of real situations in which patients effectively contributed (positively or negatively) to patient safety. Results were then collectively discussed. RESULTS: Patient participation allows not only to detect and recover some mistakes or errors made by the professionals (error of identity), but also to decrease patients' risk behaviors (purposely taking the place of another patient in order to be treated faster). However, it must be seen as a possibility offered to patients, and not as an obligation. CONCLUSION: Patient participation to patient safety is a field of study, which requires to be developed in order to define the conditions enhancing such participation and to implement a set of actions to improve healthcare safety by a cooperative management of this one.

Post mortem scientific sampling and the search for causes of death in intensive care: what information should be given and what consent should be obtained?

PURPOSE: The search for cause of death is important to improve knowledge and provide answers for the relatives of the deceased. Medical autopsy following unexplained death in hospital is one way to identify cause of death but is difficult to carry out routinely. Post mortem sampling (PMS) of tissues via thin biopsy needle or 'mini incisions' in the skin may be a useful alternative. A study was undertaken to assess how this approach is perceived by intensive care doctors and also to evaluate how this practice is considered in ethical terms in France. METHODS: A study of PMS practices immediately after death in 10 intensive care departments was performed. The medical director of each centre was interviewed by telephone and asked to describe practices in their unit and to outline the questions raised by this practice. RESULTS: PMS is routinely performed in 70% of the units which responded, without systematically obtaining formal consent and without precise rules for communicating results. Approaches to PMS differed between centres, but all physicians felt that PMS is useful for the scientific information it gives and also for the information it provides for relatives. All physicians regret the lack of standards to structure PMS practices. CONCLUSION: Information from post mortem examinations is important for society to inform about causes of death, for doctors to improve practices and for decision-makers responsible for organising care. Debate persists regarding the balance between individual rights and community interests. It is suggested that an approach for identifying cause of death could easily be integrated into the relationship between carers and relatives, provided full transparency is maintained.

[Decision process in oncology: the importance of multidisciplinary meeting]. / La réunion de concertation pluridisciplinaire : quelle place dans la décision médicale en cancérologie ?

Multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) in oncology has been institutionalised in France by the Cancer Plan. This study aims to determine the place of MDM in the decision process. From November 2004 to July 2005, we observed 29 meetings at the Tours Hospital and 324 case presentations, 80 in orthopaedics, 151 in gastroenterology and 93 in chest medicine. Forty physicians attending the meetings answered a questionnaire exploring their opinions on MDM and the collegial decision. We found that MDM is mostly the place for technical discussions and that patients' wishes are rarely addressed. The different medical specialities are well represented but we observed that only physicians attend MDM. Decisions for straightforward cases are rapidly validated. For more complex clinical situations (25 to 40% of case presentations), the multidisciplinary approach allows to adapt guidelines or to choose alternative treatments. All the physicians interviewed express that MDM legitimates the medical decision. It occurs that they disagree with the RCP decision. We discuss how MDM impacts on the medical decision as well as the shift from the individual decision to the collective one, particularly in term of responsibility.

[Why teams in charge of children after a pediatric intensive care unit stay do not take into account the treatment limitation decisions previously made by intensivists]. / Pourquoi les décisions de limitation des traitements en réanimation ne sont-elles pas partagées avec les professionnels assurant les soins de l'enfant avant et après la réanimation?

UNLABELLED: The fact that some children may survive despite a limitation of treatment decision (LTD) made in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) is a recent concern. A previous study pointed out that the teams in charge of children after the PICU stay did not take previous PICU LTDs into account. PURPOSE: To identify the problems different units experience in cooperating with the PICU team, in order to increase the continuity of care for these children. STUDY DESIGN: Qualitative single-center study, using semi-structured interviews with physicians in charge of children who were discharged from the PICU even though a LTD was made. RESULTS: Nine pediatric subspecialists (hemato-oncologists, neurologists, and neurosurgeons) were interviewed, producing a corpus of approximately 80 pages of typed text. Three conflictual situations were identified by these physicians. The most frequently reported situation was being asked by the PICU team to give expert advice on a patient's prognosis, before a LTD was made. The 2 others had to defend a true care plan for children who were transferred to the PICU and designing a new care plan for children who were discharged from the PICU after a LTD was made. CONCLUSION: The medical reasoning model that is used for LTDs in the PICU generates conflictual situations when compared to the models that are used in other specialties. These models represent various expressions of subjectivity, as in any medical decision. Acknowledging this fact could facilitate its integration into clinical practice and should improve authentic debates that are necessary to ensure continuity of care for these children.

Is the non-respect of ethical principles by health professionals during first-trimester sonographic Down syndrome screening damaging to patient autonomy?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the understanding of health professionals involved in first-trimester ultrasound screening of the ethical stakes involved by addressing three questions regarding: how much these professionals know about Down syndrome screening by nuchal translucency thickness measurement; their personal opinion with respect to this screening test; and their attitude with respect to their patients, in order to answer the question: 'Are ethical principles respected when women are proposed ultrasound screening during the first trimester of pregnancy?' METHODS: We studied the medical population in the east part of France by sending a questionnaire to each of 460 medical correspondents. This questionnaire attempted to evaluate the respondent's level of medical knowledge, their personal opinion with respect to first-trimester screening and their attitude towards their patients. We adapted the three-dimensional diagram designed by Marteau et al. to develop a measure of informed choice regarding screening. Only health professionals who were relatively well informed and adopted an autonomy-oriented approach were considered to be in a position to obtain true consent from their patients, respecting ethical principles in terms of competence and the autonomy of patients. RESULTS: We received 276 (60%) responses to the questionnaire. Only 31.9% of health professionals had an approach that facilitated obtaining true consent from their patients and respected the ethical principles of competence and patient autonomy; 46% were in favor of the screening test and adopted an autonomy-oriented approach but were poorly informed; and 15.4% had a directive-authoritarian approach combined with poor knowledge. Regression analysis showed that two independent factors (speciality (P = 0.031) and location of practice (P = 0.034)) affected the level of medical knowledge, and two independent factors (location of practice (P = 0.034) and the type of medical practice i.e. public or private (P < 0.05)) affected the opinion of health professionals about the screening test. Two independent factors (speciality (P < 0.001) and the age of the health professional (P = 0.02)) affected the attitudes of health professionals towards their patients. CONCLUSION: The answer to the question 'Are ethical principles respected when women are proposed ultrasound screening during the first trimester of pregnancy?' is clearly 'No'. Major effort is required to ensure that the decisions made by patients are based on a possibility of true choice.

[What become the decisions of limitation of treatments after discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit?]. / Que deviennent les décisions de limitation ou d'arrêt des traitements actifs à la sortie de réanimation pédiatrique ?

UNLABELLED: The fact that some children may survive despite a decision of limitation of treatments (DLT) is taken in Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) is a recent data. Although the French-speaking Group of Paediatric Intensive and Emergency Care (GFRUP) has published guidelines for limitation of treatments in PICU, outcome of these surviving children has not yet been studied. PURPOSES: To evaluate transmission of data concerning DLT in PICU toward teams in charge of children after the PICU stay and to evaluate perennility of these decisions. METHOD: Cohort study in children for whom DLT was discussed and who were discharged from PICU between 2002 and 2006. The study included an analysis of the medical files and discussions with the physicians in charge of children at the time of the study, including their responses to standardised scenarios concerning the outcome of their patients. RESULTS: Among the 96 children for whom DLT was discussed in PICU, 37 were discharged toward another unit. Only 1 discharge letter mentioned the DLT. At the time of the study, the Pediatric Overall Performance Category (POPC) score had increased in 16 children and was stable in 12. All the 6 children with a worsening POPC score died, without PICU readmission. The physicians in charge of children after the PICU stay did not remember any DLT. For 18 children (including 8 with previous DLT) PICU readmission would be proposed in case of life-threatening event. Their median POPC score at the time of study was lower than that of other children (3 versus 4; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: This study shows a lack of DLT data transmission, which is in contradiction with the GFRUP's guidelines. Correction of this lack is essential to improve cooperation between units in charge of these children.

Ethical issues arising from the requirement to sign a consent form in palliative care.

French healthcare networks aim to help healthcare workers to take care of patients by improving cooperation, coordination and the continuity of care. When applied to palliative care in the home, they facilitate overall care including medical, social and psychological aspects. French legislation in 2002 required that an information document explaining the functioning of the network should be given to patients when they enter a healthcare network. The law requires that this document be signed. Ethical issues arise from this legislation with regard to the validity of the signature of dying patients. Signature of the consent form by a guardian or trustee, a designated person--the Person of Trust--transforms the doctor-patient relationship into a triangular doctor-patient-third-party relationship.

[Analysis of the ethical issues raised by a ten-year epidemiology program in French Guiana: limitations of the current legal framework and solutions adopted]. / Analyse des enjeux éthiques soulevés au cours d'un programme de recherche épidémiologique de dix années en Guyane française : limites de l'encadrement actuel et solutions adoptées.

BACKGROUND: This paper discusses the ethical aspects of a large research program in virology, conducted since 1994 and which has evolved in parallel with the elaboration of bioethics laws in France. This research, which involved the collection of a considerable amount of epidemiological data in the field, focused on epidemiological determinants (mother to child transmission, genetic susceptibility/resistance) of the human oncogenic retrovirus human T cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1). Data were collected from a specific population (Noirs Marrons) living in remote areas in French Guiana (South America). This ethnic group of African descent is highly endemic for HTLV-1 and associated adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma. The population has lived for two centuries on either side of the Maroni river, which constitutes the frontier between French Guiana and Surinam. The low socioeconomic and education levels of a large part of this population are mainly explained by a recent housing/residence fixation on the French side of the Maroni river. It is also linked to significant immigration from Surinam due to the civil war, which lasted for five years in the late 1990s, in this country. Conducting epidemiological surveys in this peculiar context illustrates the limitations of the available current legal framework in France for such studies. Indeed, several important ethical issues arose concerning not only individual and population benefits, but also specificities of the given information and of the informed consent. Another question concerns individual information feed-back in such a context of persistent viral infection, with a very low disease incidence, in a population with a relatively low education level. The goal of this work was mainly to report several of the ethical issues encountered and to discuss possible ways of achieving better information deliver and consent procedures in such a context. Indeed, these procedures should include new ideas and regulations promoting a real partnership, in order to conduct long-term epidemiological studies in populations with a low education level.

Are the GFRUP's recommendations for withholding or withdrawing treatments in critically ill children applicable? Results of a two-year survey.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of the guidelines of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) for limitation of treatments in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). DESIGN: A 2-year prospective survey. SETTING: A 12-bed PICU at the Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France. PATIENTS: Were included when limitation of treatments was expected. RESULTS: Of 967 children admitted, 55 were included with a 2-day median delay. They were younger than others (24 v 60 months), had a higher paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score (14 v 4), and a higher paediatric overall performance category (POPC) score at admission (2 v 1); all p<0.002. 34 (50% of total deaths) children died. A limitation decision was made without meeting for 7 children who died: 6 received do-not-resuscitate orders (DNROs) and 1 received withholding decision. Decision-making meetings were organised for 31 children, and the following decisions were made: 12 DNROs (6 deaths and 6 survivals), 4 withholding (1 death and 3 survivals), with 14 withdrawing (14 deaths) and 1 continuing treatment (survival). After limitation, 21 (31% of total deaths) children died and 10 survived (POPC score 4). 13 procedures were interrupted because of death and 11 because of clinical improvement (POPC score 4). Parents' opinions were obtained after 4 family conferences (for a total of 110 min), 3 days after inclusion. The first meeting was planned for 6 days after inclusion and held on the 7th day after inclusion; 80% of parents were immediately informed of the decision, which was implemented after half a day. CONCLUSIONS: GFRUPs procedure was applicable in most cases. The main difficulties were anticipating the correct date for the meeting and involving nurses in the procedure. Children for whom the procedure was interrupted because of clinical improvement and who survived in poor condition without a formal decision pointed out the need for medical criteria for questioning, which should systematically lead to a formal decision-making process.

Ethical issues arising from the requirement to provide written information in palliative care.

French Healthcare Networks aim to help healthcare workers take care of patients by improving co-operation, co-ordination and the continuity of care. When applied to palliative care in the home, they facilitate overall care, including medical, social and psychological aspects. French legislation in 2002 required that an information document explaining the functioning of the Network should be given to patients when they enter a Healthcare Network. Ethical problems arise from this legislation with regard to providing terminal patients with explicit information upon their entry into the palliative phase of the disease, and requiring them to sign the document. It highlights the limitations of this practice, and the gap between the legislation and the nature of the physician-patient relationship in palliative care.