Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Dig Dis Sci ; 67(6): 2011-2018, 2022 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34463882

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: One manifestation of low-value medical practice is the medical reversal, a practice in widespread use that, once subjected to a randomized controlled trial (RCT), is found to be no better-or worse-than a prior established standard of care. We aimed to determine the prevalence of medical reversals in gastroenterology (GI) journals and characterize these reversals. METHODS: We searched the American Journal of Gastroenterology, Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Gastroenterology, Gut, Hepatology, and the Journal of Hepatology, reviewing studies published in 2015-2019. We identified RCTs that tested an established clinical practice and produced negative results, considered tentative reversals. Any systematic review or meta-analysis that included the article was categorized as confirming the reversal, refuting the reversal, or providing insufficient data. RESULTS: During the 5-year period, we identified 5,898 original articles, of which 212 tested an established practice and 52 were categorized as unrefuted medical reversals (25% of articles testing standard of care). Of the reversals, 21 (40%) tested procedures and devices, 15 (29%) tested medications, and 8 (15%) tested vitamins/supplements/diet. Twenty-three (44%) considered the alimentary tract, 12 (23%) considered the liver, pancreas, or biliary tract, and 17 (33%) considered endoscopy. Thirty-eight (73%) were funded exclusively by non-industry sources. CONCLUSION: This review reveals a total of 52 reversals across all subfields of GI and medical, procedural, screening, and diagnostic interventions, occurring in 25% of randomized trials testing an established practice. More research is needed to determine the optimal way to engage stakeholders and remove reversed practices from medical care.


Assuntos
Gastroenterologia , Humanos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
Anticancer Res ; 40(9): 5291-5294, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32878819

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIM: Palbociclib is an FDA-approved cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. Limited information is available regarding the toxicity of palbociclib and concurrent radiation therapy. CASE REPORT: Herein, we report a case of esophageal toxicity in a patient treated with palbociclib and radiation therapy. A 63-year-old woman was treated with palbociclib followed by palliative radiation therapy. The patient presented three days after completing radiation therapy with severe odynophagia, and dysphagia and was found to have grade 2-3 esophageal ulcers. Palbociclib and radiation therapy was held on admission, and a resolution of her symptoms and improvement in her oral intake was noted at which time she was restarted on palbociclib with no further radiation treatment. CONCLUSION: Caution is advised when patients are undergoing concurrent palbociclib and even low-dose palliative radiation treatment. In these patients, providers should maintain a high index of suspicion for toxicities such as dermatitis or mucositis.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Mucosite/diagnóstico , Mucosite/etiologia , Piperazinas/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Radioterapia Adjuvante/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Terapia Combinada/efeitos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Feminino , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos , Piperazinas/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
4.
MedEdPORTAL ; 16: 10934, 2020 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32704540

RESUMO

Introduction: As evidenced by student performance on various assessments, pharmacotherapy remains a comparative weakness in undergraduate medical education, with several institutions developing novel strategies for students to apply these principles in a practical setting. Medical curricula have recently prioritized group-learning modalities and evidence-based medicine education. However, these principles have yet to impact pharmacology education. We developed and implemented an evidence-based, group-learning exercise for first-year medical students focusing on pharmacology through the practical lens of pharmacotherapy and pharmacopolicy. Methods: First-year medical students in different groups were assigned a particular medication and, during an in-class session, were encouraged to meet with other representatives assigned the same drug to interpret the provided package insert and any online information. Students then reconvened with their groups to engage in collaborative teaching about each assigned drug before completing a group quiz using online resources. Facilitators reviewed the group quiz and allowed time for student questions. Results: For 180 participants, the average group-quiz score was 86%, ranging from 68% to 100%. Student-reported satisfaction with the activity in meeting its preset objectives averaged 3.7 on a 5-point scale, with 5 being most positive. Discussion: Overall, this activity effectively integrates principles of pharmacotherapy and pharmacopolicy into a group-based, evidence-based exercise. Limitations of the activity include the number of possible example drugs and the amount of material covered in a given time frame. However, the activity lends itself to the role of an introductory session in a longer curriculum centered on clinical-applied pharmacology and evidence-based practice.


Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina , Estudantes de Medicina , Currículo , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Aprendizagem
5.
J Med Toxicol ; 16(4): 416-422, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32468345

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioid-associated ototoxicity is a known complication of opioid exposure, although the mechanism remains unclear. While historically most closely linked to heroin and oxycodone, evolving reports suggest that it may be a class effect of opioids. However, the evidence is limited to case reports. METHODS: A retrospective review of the New Jersey Poison Center records (ToxiCALL®) identified cases that included both hearing loss and recent opioid exposure between January 1, 1999, and September 21, 2018. RESULTS: Forty-one cases were identified, mean age 29.4 years, 51% (n = 21) were male. Reported heroin exposures comprised 51% (n = 22), 18 of which were heroin alone. The next most commonly cited opioids were oxycodone (n = 7), methadone, (n = 4), and tramadol (n = 3). Hearing loss was described as tinnitus in 24% of cases, hypoacusis in 37% of cases, deafness in 29% of cases, and mixed tinnitus/hypoacusis in 10% of cases. Only 34% (n = 14) of cases were associated with a potential hypoxic event. Of the cases that documented resolution data, 21% (n = 4 of 19) reported no improvement at time of hospital discharge. DISCUSSION: Opioid-associated ototoxicity appears to be a hypoxia-independent adverse effect since most of the reported cases did not involve a known contributory hypoxic event. It occurs with a wide array of opioids, which supports an opioid receptor-mediated mechanism. The ototoxic effect may be self-limited in many patients. CONCLUSION: Opioid-associated ototoxicity was most commonly associated with heroin exposure and appeared independent of hypoxic events. Further investigation that clarifies the risk factors and long-term outcomes is needed.


Assuntos
Perda Auditiva/induzido quimicamente , Perda Auditiva/epidemiologia , Antagonistas de Entorpecentes/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Ototoxicidade/epidemiologia , Centros de Controle de Intoxicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Usuários de Drogas , Feminino , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Ototoxicidade/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 77(5): 1042.e1-1042.e10, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738063

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Medical error in the United States carries substantial economic and safety costs, which manifest in a large number of malpractice suits filed each year. The aim of this study was to characterize the various sociologic and medical factors that influence malpractice suits occurring from cases of facial trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined defendant data from facial trauma malpractice cases extracted from the Westlaw database, a database composed of representative federal litigations. Study variables of interest included geographic region, type of trial, injury category, and provider specialty, which were analyzed for impact on initial and final legal decisions. Descriptive statistics, Pearson χ2 test, and Fisher t test were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Of the 69 defendants (76.8% men and 23.2% women; age range, 17 to 57 yr), which resulted from 53 claims, 12 (17.4%) involved plastic surgeons and 10 (14.5%) involved emergency physicians. Most complaints consisted of inadequate care that deviated from treatment standards (32 [46.4%]) and delayed diagnosis (24 [34.8%]). Of delayed diagnosis cases, 14 patients had radiographic imaging performed. Geographic location of the claim was statistically significant-the Midwest upheld 40% of complaints (P = .007) and the South dismissed 91.4% (P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of sociologic factors, including geographic region, informed consent, and cosmesis, and medical factors, such as delayed diagnosis and deviation from standard of care, in facial trauma litigation were found to be incongruent with previous studies describing the medicolegal influences in facial plastic procedures. This analysis provides greater insight to surgical practitioners across subspecialty disciplines regarding the potential legal implications of malpractice.


Assuntos
Imperícia , Adolescente , Adulto , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Masculino , Erros Médicos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgiões , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 159(5): 817-823, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29807490

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the risk for perioperative complications associated with body mass index (BMI) class in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for all cases of head and neck free flaps between 2005 and 2014 (N = 2187). This population was stratified into underweight, normal-weight, overweight, and obese BMI cohorts. Groups were compared for demographics, comorbidities, and procedure-related variables. Rates of postoperative complications were compared between groups using χ2 and binary logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Underweight patients (n = 160) had significantly higher rates of numerous comorbidities, including disseminated cancer, preoperative chemotherapy, and anemia, while obese patients (n = 447) had higher rates of diabetes and hypertension. Rates of overall surgical complications, medical complications, and flap loss were insignificantly different between BMI groups. Following regression, obese BMI was protective for perioperative transfusion requirement (odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, P = .001), while underweight status conferred increased risk (OR = 2.43, P < .001). Recent weight loss was found to be an independent predictor of perioperative cardiac arrest (OR = 3.16, P = .006) while underweight BMI was not (OR = 1.21, P = .763). However, both weight loss and underweight status were associated with significantly increased risk for 30-day mortality (OR = 4.48, P = .032; OR = 4.02, P = .010, respectively). CONCLUSION: Obesity does not increase the risk for postoperative complications in head and neck free flap surgery and may be protective in some cases. When assessing a patient's fitness for surgery, underweight status or recent weight loss may suggest a reduced ability to tolerate extensive free flap reconstruction.


Assuntos
Índice de Massa Corporal , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/cirurgia , Obesidade/complicações , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Bases de Dados Factuais , Estética , Feminino , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplante , Rejeição de Enxerto , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esvaziamento Cervical/métodos , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Valores de Referência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...