RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The brain atrophy commonly occurs in elderly and in some childhood conditions making the techniques for quantifying brain volume needful. Since the automated quantitative methods of brain volume assessment have limited availability in developing countries, it was the purpose of this study to design and test an alternative formula that is applicable to all healthcare levels. METHODS: The multi-linear diagonal brain fraction formula (DBF) was designed from dimensions of brain relative to skull and ventricles. To test a developed formula, a total of 347 subjects aged between 0 and 18 years who had brain CT scans performed recruited and subjected to a systematic measurement of their brains in a diagonal brain fashion. RESULTS: Out of 347 patients evaluated, 62 subjects (17.8 %) were found to be cases of brain atrophy. The three radiological measurements which included sulcal width (SW), ventricular width (VW) and Evans Index (EI) were concurrently performed. SW and VW showed good age correlation. Similar tests were extended to diagonal brain fraction (DBF) and skull vertical horizontal ratio (VHR) in which DBF showed significant age correlation. CONCLUSIONS: The DBF formula shows significant ability of differentiating changes of brain volume suggesting that it can be utilized as an alternative brain fraction quantification method bearing technical simplicity in assessing gross brain volume. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The designed formula is unique in that it captures even the possible asymmetrical volume loss of brain through diagonal lines. The proposed scores being in term of ratios give four grades of brain atrophy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: High blood pressure is increasing worldwide, disproportionately so in developing countries. Inadequate health care systems and adoption of unhealthy lifestyles have been linked to this emergent pattern. To better understand this trend, it is imperative we measure prevalence of hypertension, and examine specific risk factors, at a local level. This study provides a cross-sectional view of urban residents of Arusha City to determine prevalence and associated risk factors. METHODS: Blood pressure was measured using a digital sphygmomanometer. Interviews were conducted using the WHO STEPwise survey questionnaire to assess lifestyle factors. Dietary intake information was collected by a standardized Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze demographic characteristics. Means and standard deviations were calculated for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Pearson's Chi Square (χ 2) tests were used to determine significant risk factors for hypertension, and multivariate log binomial regression was used to reveal potential predictors of hypertension. Dietary patterns were analyzed by principal component analysis. RESULTS: Approximately 45% of the study population was found to be hypertensive. The mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) of the sample was 102.3 mmHg (SD = 18.3). Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure were 136.3 (SD = 30.5) and 85.3 (SD = 16.1) mmHg, respectively. Through multivariate analysis, age and body mass index were found to be independently, positively, associated with hypertension. Adherence to 'healthy' dietary pattern was negatively independently associated with hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: With nearly half of participants being hypertensive, this study suggests that hypertension is a significant health risk in Arusha, Tanzania. Obesity, healthy diet, and age were found to be positively associated with hypertension risk. This study did not establish any significant association between increased blood pressure and Western-dietary pattern, cigarette smoking, alcohol intake, and physical activities.
