Efficacy and safety of zero-fluoroscopy approach for ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia: experience from more than 1000 cases.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of the slow pathway in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is associated with high efficacy and low risk of total perioperative or late atrioventricular block. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of slow-pathway RFCA for AVNRT using a zero-fluoroscopy approach. METHODS: Data were obtained from a prospective multicenter registry of catheter ablation from January 2012 to February 2018. Consecutive unselected patients with the final diagnosis of AVNRT were recruited. Electrophysiological and 3-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical mapping systems were used to create 3D maps and to navigate only 2 catheters from the femoral access. Acute procedural efficacy was evaluated using the isoproterenol and/or atropine test, with 15-min observation after ablation. Each case of recurrence or complication was consulted at an outpatient clinic during long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 1032 procedures, 1007 (97.5%) were completed without fluoroscopy. Conversion to fluoroscopy was required in 25 patients (2.5%), mainly due to an atypical location of the coronary sinus (n = 7) and catheter instability (n = 7). The mean radiation exposure time was 1.95 ± 1.3 min for these cases. The mean fluoroscopy time for the entire study cohort was 0.05 ± 0.4 min. The mean total procedure time was 44.8 ± 18.6 min. There were no significant in-hospital complications. The total success rate was 96.1% (n = 992), and the recurrence rate was 3.9% (n = 40). CONCLUSION: Slow-pathway RFCA can be safely performed without fluoroscopy, with a minimal risk of complications and a high success rate.

A simplified approach for evaluating sustained slow pathway conduction for diagnosis and treatment of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in children and adults.

PURPOSE: During incremental atrial pacing in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, the PR interval often exceeds the RR interval (PR > RR) during stable 1:1 AV conduction. However, the PR/RR ratio has never been evaluated in a large group of patients with pacing from the proximal coronary sinus and after isoproterenol challenge. Our study validates new site of pacing and easier method of identification of PR > RR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective protocol of incremental atrial pacing from the proximal coronary sinus was carried out in 398 patients (AVNRT-228 and control-170). The maximum stimulus to the Q wave interval (S-Q = PR), SS interval (S-S), and Q-Q (RR) interval were measured at baseline and 10 min after successful slow pathway ablation and after isoproterenol challenge (obligatory). RESULTS: The mean maximum PR/RR ratios at baseline were 1.17 ±â€¯0.24 and 0.82 ±â€¯0.13 (p < 0.00001) in the AVNRT and controls respectively. There were no PR/RR ratios ≥1 at baseline and after isoproterenol challenge in 12.3% of the AVNRT group and in 95.9% of the control group (p < 0.0001). PR/RR ratios ≥1 were absent in 98% of AVNRT cases after slow pathway ablation/modification in children and 99% of such cases in adults (P = NS). The diagnostic performance of PR/RR ratio evaluation before and after isoproterenol challenge had the highest diagnostic performance for AVNRT with PR/RR > = 1 (sensitivity: 88%, specificity: 96%, PPV-97%, NPV-85%). CONCLUSIONS: The PR/RR ratio is a simple tool for slow pathway substrate and AVNRT evaluation. Eliminating PR/RR ratios ≥1 may serve as a surrogate endpoint for slow pathway ablation in children and adults with AVNRT.