Subclinical bowel inflammation increases healthcare resources utilization and steroid use before diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Previous data support that the inflammatory process underlying ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) can start years before the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to determine if patients with an incidental diagnosis of UC or CD demonstrate an increase in healthcare utilization in the years preceding the symptomatic onset of the disease. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective, hospital-based, case-control study. Patients with an incidental diagnosis of UC or CD during the colorectal cancer screening program at 9 hospitals were included. Cases were matched 1:3 and compared separately with two control populations: one including healthy non-IBD subjects adjusted by gender, age, and date, excluding those with visits to Gastroenterology; and a second control cohort of UC/CD patients with symptomatic onset. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients with preclinical inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were included (87 UC, 30 CD, 7 IBD unclassified; median age 56 years). Patients with preclinical IBD showed an increase in the number of visits to Primary Care up to 3 and 5 years before diagnosis (aIRR 1.59, 95% CI [1.37-1.86], p = 0.001; aIRR 1.43, 95% CI [1.24-1.67], p = 0.01) and more frequent use of steroids (aOR 2.84, 95% CI [1.21-6.69], p = 0.03; aOR 2.25, 95% CI [1.06-4.79], p = 0.04) compared to matched non-IBD healthy controls, respectively. In contrast, patients with a symptomatic onset visited Primary Care less frequently, but they had an increase in the number of visits to Emergency Department, specialist care, sick-leaves, CT/ultrasound examinations, and use of antibiotics or systemic steroids. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased need for medical assistance and use of systemic steroids during the presymptomatic phase of IBD. These results will help in establishing new tools for early identification of IBD in the future.

Adalimumab treatment of anti-TNF-naïve patients with ulcerative colitis: Deep remission and response factors.

BACKGROUND: Adalimumab is the second tumour necrosis factor antagonist (anti-TNF) adopted for the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Clinical data from naïve patients are scarce. AIM: Examine the response to adalimumab in TNF-antagonist-naïve patients. METHODS: This multicentre, observational, prospective study was conducted using a cohort of consecutive patients with ulcerative colitis. Clinical remission, mucosal healing and deep remission were examined employing the Mayo Score and Mayo Endoscopic Score. Clinical response was assessed using the Partial Mayo Score. RESULTS: Of 53 individuals included in this study, 49.1% of patients were in clinical remission at week 8 and 60.3%, at week 52. Clinical response was observed in 84.9% and 69.8%, respectively. Mucosal healing was found in 62.3% and 67.9% of the patients, and 43.4% and 58.4% showed deep remission at week 8 and 52, respectively. After a year, 71.7% of the patients continued the adalimumab treatment. Adverse effects were observed in 28.3% of patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the long-term factor predictive of response at week 52 was the response in week 8 (expressed as Mayo Score; OR 0.66; 95% IC 0.1-0.67, p < 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab treatment of ulcerative colitis is effective; the results are better in clinical practice and in patients naïve to anti-TNF.

Diagnosis of Whipple's disease using molecular biology techniques.

The diagnosis of Whipple's disease (WD) is based on the existence of clinical signs and symptoms compatible with the disease and in the presence of PAS-positive diastase-resistant granules in the macrophages of the small intestine. If there is suspicion of the disease but no histological findings or only isolated extraintestinal manifestations, species-specific PCR using different sequences of the T. whippleii genome from different tissue types and biological fluids is recommended.This study reports two cases: the first patient had diarrhea and the disease was suspected after an endoscopic examination of the ileum, while the second patient had multi-systemic manifestations,particularly abdominal, thoracic, and peripheral lymphadenopathies. In both cases, the diagnosis was confirmed using molecular biology techniques to samples from the small intestine or from a retroperineal lymph node, respectively.

Diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Whipple por técnicas de biología molecular. Aportación de dos casos / Diagnosis of Whipple's disease using molecular biology techniques

El diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Whipple (EW) se basa en la existencia de una clínica compatible y en el hallazgo de gránulos PAS +, diastasa resistente, en los macrófagos del intestino delgado. Si hay sospecha de enfermedad pero no evidencia histológica o manifestaciones extraintestinales aisladas se precisa el estudio mediante PCR específicas de distintas secuencias del genoma de T. whippleii en tejidos y fluidos biológicos. Se presentan dos casos, uno con diarrea en el que se sospechó la enfermedad tras ileoscopia y otro con manifestaciones multisistémicas, sobre todo adenopatías abdominales, torácicas y periféricas. En ambos, el estudio molecular del intestino delgado y de una linfadenopatía retroperitoneal respectivamente confirmó el diagnóstico(AU)

The diagnosis of Whipple’s disease (WD) is based on the existence of clinical signs and symptoms compatible with the disease and in the presence of PAS-positive diastase-resistant granules in the macrophages of the small intestine. If there is suspicion of the disease but no histological findings or only isolated extraintestinal manifestations, species-specific PCR using different sequences of the T. whippleii genome from different tissue types and biological fluids is recommended. This study reports two cases: the first patient had diarrhea and the disease was suspected after an endoscopic examination of the ileum, while the second patient had multi-systemic manifestations, particularly abdominal, thoracic, and peripheral lymphadenopathies. In both cases, the diagnosis was confirmed using molecular biology techniques to samples from the small intestine or from a retroperineal lymph node, respectively(AU)