Malnutrition and Nutrition Support in Latin American PICUs: The Nutrition in PICU (NutriPIC) Study.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the nutritional status of children admitted to Latin American (LA) PICUs and to describe the adequacy of nutrition support in reference to contemporary international recommendations. DESIGN: The Nutrition in PICU (NutriPIC) study was a combined point-prevalence study of malnutrition carried out on 1 day in 2021 (Monday 8 November) and a retrospective cohort study of adequacy of nutritional support in the week preceding. SETTING: Four-one PICUs in 13 LA countries. PATIENTS: Patients already admitted to the PICU of 1 month to 18 years old on the study day were included in the point-prevalence study. For the retrospective arm, we included patients receiving nutritional support on the study day and with a PICU length of stay (LOS) greater than or equal to 72 hours. Exclusion criteria were being a neonate, conditions that precluded accurate anthropometric measurements, and PICU LOS greater than 14 days. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of 316 patients screened, 5 did not meet age criteria. There were 191 of 311 patients who were included in the point-prevalence study and underwent anthropometric evaluation. Underweight and length for age less than -2 z scores were present in 42 of 88 children (47.7%) and 41 of 88 children (46.6%) less than 24 months old, and 14 of 103 (13.6%) and (23/103) 22.3% of 103 children greater than or equal to 24 months, respectively. Evidence of obesity (body mass index > 2 z score) was present in 7 of 88 children (5.7%) less than 24 months old and 13 of 103 children (12.6%) greater than or equal to 24 months. In the 115 of 311 patients meeting criteria for the retrospective arm, a total of 98 patients reported complete nutritional data. The 7-day median (interquartile range) adequacy for delivered versus recommended enteral energy and protein requirement was 114% (75, 154) and 99% (60, 133), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The NutriPIC study found that in 2021 malnutrition was highly prevalent especially in PICU admissions of less than 24 months old. Retrospectively, the 7-day median nutritional support appears to meet both energy and protein requirements.

The Latin American and Spanish Survey on Nutrition in Pediatric Intensive Care (ELAN-CIP2).

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the practices of nutritional support in Latin American and Spanish PICUs. DESIGN: Survey with a questionnaire sent to Latin American Society of Pediatric Intensive Care members. SETTING: PICUs of participant hospitals. PATIENTS: Critically ill children between 1 month and 18 years old. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-seven surveys from 17 countries were analyzed. Sixty-seven percent of PICUs were from university-affiliated hospitals, with a median of 380 admissions/yr. Sixty-eight percent and 48.9% had a nutritional support team and nutritional support protocol, respectively. Seventy-five percent completed nutritional evaluations, with 34.2% at admission. PICUs with high-volume admissions were likely to have a nutritional support team (p < 0.005), and university-affiliated hospitals showed a trend of having a nutritional support team (p = 0.056). Measured, estimated, and ideal weights were used in 75%, 14.6%, and 10.4%, respectively. Energy requirements were calculated using Holliday & Segar and Schofield equations in 90% of the PICUs; 43% used correction factors. Only three PICUs had indirect calorimetry. At day 3 of initiation of nutritional support, 57.3% of PICUs provided at least 50% of the calculated energy requirement, and 91.5% at day 5. Protein needs were estimated according to American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism/European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition guidelines in 55.3% and 40.4%, respectively. Enteral nutrition was the preferred feeding method, initiated in 97.7% at 48 hours. The feeding route was gastric (82.9%), by bolus (42.5%) or continuous (57.4%). Monitoring methods included gastric residual measurement in 55.3%. Enteral nutrition was discontinued in 82.8% when gastric residual was 50% of the volume. Prokinetics were used in 68%. More than half of PICUs used parenteral nutrition, with 95.8% of them within 72 hours. Parenteral nutrition was administered by central vein in 93.6%. Undernourished children received parenteral nutrition sooner, whether or not enteral nutrition intolerance was present. When enteral nutrition was not tolerated beyond 72 hours, parenteral nutrition was started in 57.4%. Parenteral nutrition was initiated when enteral nutrition delivered less than 50% in 97%. CONCLUSIONS: Nutritional practices are heterogeneous in Latin American PICUs, but the majority use nutritional support strategies consistent with international guidelines.

[Measurement of rest energy expanditure in pediatric oncological patients: concordance between indirect calorimetry and predictive equations]. / Medición del gasto energético de reposo en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos: concordancia entre calorimetría indirecta y ecuaciones predictivas.

INTRODUCTION: in childhood cancer, the disease impacts resting energy expenditure (GER) in a way that is not estimable by predictive equations. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study is to determine the concordance between the measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) by indirect calorimetry in pediatric oncology patients versus the World Health Organization (WHO) and Schofield predictive equations. METHOD: cross-sectional study in children aged 5-15 years receiving chemotherapy, in outpatient Clínica Las Condes and Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, from July 2013 to July 2015. REE measurement was performed by indirect calorimetry and WHO and Schofield equations. Concordance analysis, with clinically relevant cut-off point and concordance coefficient of 90%. RESULTS: twenty-seven children were included and 27 calorimetries were performed; 66% of these children were diagnosed with leukemia, 15% with central nervous system tumor and 81% were in the maintenance stage of their treatment. There is no significant difference between indirect calorimetry measurement versus WHO (p 0.18) or Schofield (p 0.07), neither when stratifying by nutritional status or type of cancer diagnosis. Concordance was calculated between calorimetry and Schofield, with a concordance coefficient of Lin = 79.4% (95% CI = 65.2-93.6) and versus WHO = 78% (95% CI = 62.9-93.2). CONCLUSION: this level of agreement, less than 80% in both cases, is insufficient. With both equations for estimating REE, there is overestimation or underestimation of energy requirements in more than 20% of cases. There is no agreement between the measurement of REE measured with indirect calorimetry versus its estimation with Schofield's and the WHO equations. Consequently, indirect calorimetry is required as part of the nutritional assessment in a nutritionally at-risk population such as pediatric patients with oncological pathology.

Medición del gasto energético de reposo en pacientes oncológicos pediátricos: concordancia entre calorimetría indirecta y ecuaciones predictivas / Measurement of rest energy expanditure in pediatric oncological patients: concordance between indirect calorimetry and predictive equations

Introducción: en el cáncer infantil, la enfermedad impacta sobre el gasto energético en reposo (GER) de manera no estimable mediante ecuaciones predictivas. Objetivo: determinar concordancia entre medición del gasto energético en reposo por calorimetría indirecta versusecuaciones predictivas. Método: estudio observacional analítico transversal en niños de 5-15 años que reciben quimioterapia, en control ambulatorio por la Clínica Las Condes y el Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, entre julio de 2013 y julio de 2015. Se realizó medición de GER mediante calorimetría indirecta y ecuaciones de Schofield y la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Análisis de concordancia, con punto de corte clínicamente relevante y coeficiente de concordancia del 90%. Resultados: se incluyó a 27 niños y se realizaron 27 calorimetrías. De ellos, el 66% presentaba leucemia, el 15% presentaba tumor de sistema nervioso central y el 81% se encontraba en etapa de mantención. No se encontró diferencia significativa entre medición por calorimetría indirecta versus OMS (p 0,18) ni versus Schofield (p 0,07), ni al estratificar por estado nutricional o tipo de diagnóstico oncológico. El coeficiente de concordancia de Lin entre calorimetría y Schofield fue del 79,4% (IC 95% = 65,2-93,6) y con OMS, del 78% (IC 95% = 62,9-93,2). Conclusiones: el nivel de concordancia entre calorimetría indirecta y Schofield y OMS respectivamente fue menor de 80%, lo cual es insuficiente e implica que en más de un 20% de los casos sería un cálculo de GER sobre o subestimado y, por lo tanto, con un aporte nutricional excesivo o deficitario. En consecuencia, es necesario contar con la calorimetría indirecta como parte de la evaluación nutricional en una población nutricionalmente de riesgo como esta

Introduction: in childhood cancer, the disease impacts resting energy expenditure (GER) in a way that is not estimable by predictive equations. Objective: the aim of this study is to determine the concordance between the measurement of resting energy expenditure (REE) by indirect calorimetry in pediatric oncology patients versus the World Health Organization (WHO) and Schofield predictive equations. Method: cross-sectional study in children aged 5-15 years receiving chemotherapy, in outpatient Clínica Las Condes and Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río, from July 2013 to July 2015. REE measurement was performed by indirect calorimetry and WHO and Schofield equations. Concordance analysis, with clinically relevant cut-off point and concordance coefficient of 90%. Results: twenty-seven children were included and 27 calorimetries were performed; 66% of these children were diagnosed with leukemia, 15% with central nervous system tumor and 81% were in the maintenance stage of their treatment. There is no significant difference between indirect calorimetry measurement versus WHO (p 0.18) or Schofield (p 0.07), neither when stratifying by nutritional status or type of cancer diagnosis. Concordance was calculated between calorimetry and Schofield, with a concordance coefficient of Lin = 79.4% (95% CI = 65.2-93.6) and versus WHO = 78% (95% CI = 62.9-93.2). Conclusion: this level of agreement, less than 80% in both cases, is insufficient. With both equations for estimating REE, there is overestimation or underestimation of energy requirements in more than 20% of cases. There is no agreement between the measurement of REE measured with indirect calorimetry versus its estimation with Schofield’s and the WHO equations. Consequently, indirect calorimetry is required as part of the nutritional assessment in a nutritionally at-risk population such as pediatric patients with oncological pathology