Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 19(3): 291-300, mar. 2017. graf
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-160185

RESUMO

The coming into force of Directive 2001/20/EC represented a step forward in harmonising clinical trial regulation in European countries, guaranteeing a uniform protection of subjects participating in clinical research across Europe. However, it led to a disproportionate increase in the bureaucratization, and thus, it became evident that procedures needed to be simplified without detriment to patient’s safety. Thus, Regulation 536/2014, that repealed Directive 2001/20/EC, with the aim of decreasing the growing bureaucratization and stimulating clinical research in Europe, established simplified procedures, such as regulating a common procedure for authorising trials in Europe, the institution of strict assessment timelines, or the definition of new concepts, such as «low-intervention clinical trial». The legal form of a Regulation allowed the norm to be directly applied to Member States without the need for transposition. By means of the new Royal Decree, the national legislation is adapted to make the application of the regulation feasible and it allows the development of the aspects that the Regulation leaves to national legislation. Both documents seek to stimulate clinical research with medicinal products to foster knowledge, facilitate transparency, and reinforce subjects’ safety. This will surely be the case, but with this revision, we will look at the novelties and key aspects that are most relevant to investigators and we will analyse the consequences for all parties involved in clinical research (AU)


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Legislação Referente à Liberdade de Escolha do Paciente/normas , Intervenção Legal , Estudos Controlados Antes e Depois/legislação & jurisprudência , Compensação e Reparação/legislação & jurisprudência , 51725/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Comitês de Monitoramento de Dados de Ensaios Clínicos/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulação e Fiscalização em Saúde , Declaração de Helsinki , União Europeia/organização & administração
2.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 19(3): 291-300, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27718157

RESUMO

The coming into force of Directive 2001/20/EC represented a step forward in harmonising clinical trial regulation in European countries, guaranteeing a uniform protection of subjects participating in clinical research across Europe. However, it led to a disproportionate increase in the bureaucratization, and thus, it became evident that procedures needed to be simplified without detriment to patient's safety. Thus, Regulation 536/2014, that repealed Directive 2001/20/EC, with the aim of decreasing the growing bureaucratization and stimulating clinical research in Europe, established simplified procedures, such as regulating a common procedure for authorising trials in Europe, the institution of strict assessment timelines, or the definition of new concepts, such as "low-intervention clinical trial". The legal form of a Regulation allowed the norm to be directly applied to Member States without the need for transposition. By means of the new Royal Decree, the national legislation is adapted to make the application of the regulation feasible and it allows the development of the aspects that the Regulation leaves to national legislation. Both documents seek to stimulate clinical research with medicinal products to foster knowledge, facilitate transparency, and reinforce subjects' safety. This will surely be the case, but with this revision, we will look at the novelties and key aspects that are most relevant to investigators and we will analyse the consequences for all parties involved in clinical research.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/legislação & jurisprudência , Regulamentação Governamental , Humanos , Espanha
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 12(11): 711-718, nov. 2010. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-124363

RESUMO

The incidence is increasing due to mammographic screening and an ageing population. In some countries the mortality rate has decreased especially in middleaged and younger groups because of improved treatment and possibly earlier detection. However, breast cancer is still the leading cause of cancer-related death in European women. The purpose of this work was to elaborate a Spanish Society of Medical Oncology guideline on pharmacologic interventions for early breast cancer (BC). We have compiled the latest advances in the management of this pathology either in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting, cytostatic and hormonal treatment, so that in a simple way could be useful to oncologist, residents and other related specialties (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Oncologia/métodos , Sociedades Médicas/legislação & jurisprudência , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Progressão da Doença , Oncologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Espanha/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...