[How has the Paris System contributed to urine cytology? Evaluating the contribution of the Paris System to urine cytology. A comparative study of the Paris System and the Papanicolaou method in a tertiary centre]. / ¿Qué ha aportado el sistema de París al diagnóstico en citología de orina? Estudio comparativo del sistema de París con el sistema clásico en un centro terciario.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The Paris System (PS) has replaced the classical Papanicolaou System (PapS) in reporting urine cytology, due to its improved sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) without loss of specificity. Furthermore, it has enabled the risk of malignancy to be established in each cytological category. The aim of this study is to compare the Paris System with previous results and determine the changes in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV and risk of malignancy in our centre, MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluation of the diagnostic power of urine cytology by means of a retrospective cohort study, comparing two series of 400 cytological studies, one using the Papanicolaou System and the other the Paris System. RESULTS: In the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, Paris System has better specificity (93.82% PapS vs 98.64% PS; P=.001) and PPV (39.5% PapS vs 70.6% PS; P=.044) than Papanicolaou System, without changes in sensitivity (53.5% PapS vs 37.5% PS; P=.299) or NPV (96.4% PapS vs 94.8% PS; P=.183). The risk of malignancy for the atypical category increases from low to high levels (1.6% PapS vs 40.0% PS; P=.001); the other categories showed no significant statistical changes. CONCLUSION: The Paris System improves specificity and positive predictive value and establishes a better indication of risk of malignancy for each category, enabling specific clinical management in each case.

¿Qué ha aportado el sistema de París al diagnóstico en citología de orina? Estudio comparativo del sistema de París con el sistema clásico en un centro terciario / How has the Paris System contributed to urine cytology? Evaluating the contribution of the Paris System to urine cytology. A comparative study of the Paris System and the Papanicolaou method in a tertiary centre

Introducción y objetivos: El sistema de París (SP) ha sustituido al sistema de Papanicolaou (SPap) como sistema de citodiagnóstico de orina. La evidencia indica que el SP ha logrado aumentar la sensibilidad y el valor predictivo negativo (VPN) sin perder especificidad, y establecer un riesgo de malignidad para cada categoría diagnóstica. El objetivo de este estudio es conocer los cambios que han experimentado la sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo (VPP), VPN y el riesgo de malignidad en la transición en nuestro centro. Materiales y métodos: Evaluación de prueba diagnóstica a través de una cohorte retrospectiva en la que se comparan dos series de 400 citologías de orina, una diagnosticada mediante el SPap y otra con SP. Resultados: Para la detección de carcinoma urotelial de alto grado describimos con el SP mejor especificidad (93,82 SPap vs. 98,64% SP; p=0,001) y VPP (39,5 SPap vs. 70,6% SP; p=0,044), sin observar cambios significativos en la sensibilidad (53,5 SPap vs. 37,5% SP; p=0,299) y VPN (96,4 SPap vs. 94,8% SP; p=0,183), respecto al SPap. El riesgo de malignidad en el SP experimenta un cambio estadísticamente significativo para la categoría atipia con respecto a la atipia en el SPap (1,6 SPap vs. 40,0% SP; p=0.001), manteniéndose el resto de las categorías sin cambios estadísticamente significativos. Conclusiones: El SP ha conseguido mejorar la especificidad y el VPP de la citología de orina y establece un riesgo de malignidad propio para la categoría de atipia, permitiendo establecer un manejo específico para cada resultado.(AU)

Introduction and objectives: The Paris System (PS) has replaced the classical Papanicolaou System (PapS) in reporting urine cytology, due to its improved sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) without loss of specificity. Furthermore, it has enabled the risk of malignancy to be established in each cytological category. The aim of this study is to compare the Paris System with previous results and determine the changes in sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, NPV and risk of malignancy in our centre. Materials and methods: Evaluation of the diagnostic power of urine cytology by means of a retrospective cohort study, comparing two series of 400 cytological studies, one using the Papanicolaou System and the other the Paris System. Results: In the detection of high-grade urothelial carcinoma, Paris System has better specificity (93.82% PapS vs 98.64% PS; P=.001) and PPV (39.5% PapS vs 70.6% PS; P=.044) than Papanicolaou System, without changes in sensitivity (53.5% PapS vs 37.5% PS; P=.299) or NPV (96.4% PapS vs 94.8% PS; P=.183). The risk of malignancy for the atypical category increases from low to high levels (1.6% PapS vs 40.0% PS; P=.001); the other categories showed no significant statistical changes. Conclusion: The Paris System improves specificity and positive predictive value and establishes a better indication of risk of malignancy for each category, enabling specific clinical management in each case.(AU)

Primary neuroendocrine tumour of the kidney in an asymptomatic patient involving a multidisciplinary approach.

Primary neuroendocrine tumours of the kidney are rare, and their pathophysiology is uncertain; since their discovery in 1966, they have been described only a few times in the literature. We present a case of a well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour of the kidney in an asymptomatic patient, which required a multidisciplinary approach by the hospital's team, including precise surgical treatment and an effective radiopathological diagnosis. The patient underwent right radical nephrectomy. During follow-up, he remained asymptomatic, and no metastases or complications were identified.

Liver failure caused by light chain deposition disease associated with multiple myeloma.

Acute liver failure is an unusual complication in multiple myeloma. Here, we report a case of multiple myeloma with light chain deposition disease (LCDD) that presented with progressive jaundice due to intrahepatic cholestasis. Diagnosis was made after liver biopsy that showed deposition of kappa light chains occupying perisinusoidal spaces. The patient developed encephalopathy and liver failure and died despite prompt initiation of dexamethasone therapy. The current prognosis of multiple myeloma patients with liver failure due to LCDD is dismal. New therapeutic strategies might improve this condition.

Adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata. Presentación de un nuevo caso y revisión de la literatura / Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the prostate: case report and literature rewieu

OBJETIVOS: Presentación de un nuevo caso de adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata, con descripción general de sus características, así como de los estudios histoquímicos e inmunohistoquímicos que demuestran su origen prostático, y realizamos una revisión de la literatura. MÉTODOS Y RESULTADO: Varón de 53 años que acude a nuestra consulta para revisión prostática sin sintomatología previa. Presentaba un tacto rectal normal y un PSA de 35 ng/ml, por lo que se realizó biopsia prostática con el resultado de adenocarcinoma de próstata Gleason 3+3. Con estudio de extensión negativo, se practicó prostatectomía radical con un resultado anatomopatológico de adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata. El paciente sigue vivo sin evidencia de enfermedad tras un año de seguimiento, con normalización de los valores de PSA. CONCLUSIONES: El adenocarcinoma mucinoso de próstata es una rara variedad anatomopatológica, con una historia natural y un pronóstico no bien conocido en la actualidad, y que en líneas generales no responde a ninguna terapéutica, siendo característica la hormonorresistencia (AU)

No disponible