Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP in the Initial Treatment Phase of Small Infants With Respiratory Failure.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure in infants is a common reason for admission to the pediatric ICU (PICU). Although high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is the preferred first-line treatment at our institution, some infants require CPAP or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). Here we report our experience using CPAP/NIV in infants < 10 kg. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of infants < 10 kg treated with CPAP/NIV in our PICUs between July 2017-May 2021 in the initial phase of treatment. Demographic, support type and settings, vital signs, pulse oximetry, and intubation data were extracted from the electronic health record. We compared subjects successfully treated with CPAP/NIV with those who required intubation. RESULTS: We studied 62 subjects with median (interquartile range) age 96 [6.5-308] d and weight 4.5 (3.4-6.6) kg. Of these, 22 (35%) required intubation. There were no significant differences in demographics, medical history, primary interface, pre-CPAP/NIV support, and device used to deliver CPAP/NIV. HFNC was used in 57 (92%) subjects before escalation to CPAP/NIV. Subjects who failed CPAP/NIV were less likely to have bronchiolitis (27% vs 60%, P = .040), less likely to be discharged from the hospital to home (68% vs 93%, P = .02), had a longer median hospital length of stay (LOS) (26.9 [21-50.5] d vs 10.4 [5.6-28.4] d, P = .002), and longer median ICU LOS (14.6 [7.9-25.2] d vs 5.8 [3.8-12.4] d, P = .004). Initial vital signs and FIO2 were similar, but SpO2 was lower and FIO2 higher at 6 h and 12 h after support initiation for subjects who failed CPAP/NIV. Initial CPAP/NIV settings were similar, but subjects who failed CPAP/NIV had higher maximum and final inspiratory/expiratory pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Most infants who failed initial HFNC support were successfully managed without intubation using NIV or CPAP. Bronchiolitis was associated with a lower rate of CPAP/NIV failure, whereas lower SpO2 and higher FIO2 levels were associated with higher rates of intubation.

Factors Associated With Successful Extubation Readiness Testing in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: In children with congenital heart disease, extubation readiness testing (ERT) is performed to evaluate the potential for liberation from mechanical ventilation. There is a paucity of data that suggests what mechanical ventilation parameters are associated with successful ERT. We hypothesized that ERT success would be associated with certain mechanical ventilator parameters. METHODS: Data on daily ERT assessments were recorded as part of a quality improvement project. In accordance with our respiratory therapist-driven ventilator protocol, patients were assessed daily for ERT eligibility and tested daily, if eligible. Mechanical ventilation parameters were categorized a priori to evaluate the differences in levels of respiratory support. The primary outcome was ERT success. RESULTS: A total of 780 ERTs from 320 subjects (median [interquartile range] age 2.5 [0.6-6.5] months and median weight [interquartile range] 4.2 [3.3-6.9] kg) were evaluated. A total of 528 ERTs (68%) were passed, 306 successful ERTs (58%) resulted in extubation, and 30 subjects (9.4%) were re-intubated. There were statistically significant differences in the ERT pass rate for ventilator mode, peak inspiratory pressure, Δ pressure, PEEP, mean airway pressure ([Formula: see text]), and dead-space-to-tidal-volume ratio (all P < .001) but not for [Formula: see text]. ERT success decreased with increases in peak inspiratory pressure, Δ pressure, PEEP, [Formula: see text], and dead-space-to-tidal-volume ratio. Logistic regression revealed neonates, Δ pressure ≥ 11 cm H2O, and [Formula: see text] > 10 cm H2O were associated with a decreased odds of ERT success, whereas children ages 1-5 years and an [Formula: see text] of 0.31-0.40 had increased odds of ERT success. CONCLUSIONS: ERT pass rates decreased as ventilator support increased; however, some subjects were able to pass ERT despite high ventilator support. We found that [Formula: see text] was associated with ERT success and that protocols should consider using [Formula: see text] instead of PEEP thresholds for ERT eligibility. Cyanotic lesions were not associated with ERT success, which suggests that patients with cyanotic heart disease can be included in ERT protocols.

Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP for Postextubation Support in Small Infants.

BACKGROUND: Infants with a high risk of extubation failure are often treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP, but data on the role of these support modalities following extubation are sparse. This report describes our experience using NIV or CPAP to support infants following extubation in our pediatric ICUs (PICUs). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of children < 10 kg receiving postextubation NIV or CPAP in our PICUs. Data on demographics, medical history, type of support, vital signs, pulse oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), gas exchange, support settings, and re-intubation were extracted from the electronic medical record. Support was classified as prophylactic if planned before extubation and rescue if initiated within 24 h of extubation. We compared successfully extubated and re-intubated subjects using chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables. RESULTS: We studied 51 subjects, median age 44 (interquartile range 0.5-242) d and weight 3.7 (3-4.9) kg. There were no demographic differences between groups, except those re-intubated were more likely to have had cardiac surgery prior to admission (0% vs 14%, P = .040). NIV was used in 31 (61%) and CPAP in 20 (39%) subjects. Prophylactic support was initiated in 25 subjects (49%), whereas rescue support was needed in 26 subjects (51%). Twenty-two subjects (43%) required re-intubation. Re-intubation rate was higher for rescue support (58% vs 28%, P = .032). Subjects with a pH < 7.35 (4.3% vs 42.0%, P = .003) and lower somatic NIRS (39 [24-56] vs 62 [46-72], P = .02) were more likely to be re-intubated. The inspiratory positive airway pressure, expiratory positive airway pressure, and FIO2 were higher in subjects who required re-intubation. CONCLUSIONS: NIV or CPAP use was associated with a re-intubation rate of 43% in a heterogeneous sample of high-risk infants. Acidosis, cardiac surgery, higher FIO2 , lower somatic NIRS, higher support settings, and application of rescue support were associated with the need for re-intubation.

Association Between Pressure Support During Extubation Readiness Testing and Time to First Extubation in Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

BACKGROUND: Extubation readiness testing (ERT) is often performed in children with congenital heart disease prior to liberation from mechanical ventilation. The ideal ERT method in this population is unknown. We recently changed our ERT method from variable (10, 8, or 6 cm H2O, depending on endotracheal tube size) to fixed (5 cm H2O) pressure support (PS). Our study assessed the association between this change and time to first extubation and need for re-intubation. METHODS: We studied 2 temporally distinct cohorts, one where ERT was conducted with variable PS and another using PS fixed at 5 cm H2O. Data were prospectively collected as part of a quality improvement project. The primary outcome was time to first extubation. Secondary outcomes were need for re-intubation and percentage of successful ERTs. We performed Poisson regression or logistic regression for the association between PS during ERT and time to first extubation or re-intubation, respectively. RESULTS: We included 320 subjects, 186 in the variable PS group and 152 in fixed PS group. In unadjusted analysis, median time to first extubation was longer in the fixed PS group compared to the variable PS group (4.1 [2.0-7.1] d vs 3.1 [1.1-5.9] d, P = .02), and there was no difference in re-intubation rate (11% vs 8%, P = .34). Subjects in the fixed PS group were significantly more likely to be mechanically ventilated after cardiac arrest, have a Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (STAT) category of 4 or 5, be extubated on day shift, receive enteral feeds at extubation, have higher respiratory support at extubation, and higher dead-space-to-tidal-volume ratio. After controlling for these variables in multivariable regression, we found no association between the choice of PS and time to first extubation or re-intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a fixed PS of 5 cm H2O instead of variable PS during ERT was not associated with longer time to first extubation or extubation failure.