Incidence of neuraxial haematoma after total hip or knee surgery: RECORD programme (rivaroxaban vs. enoxaparin).

BACKGROUND: Patients receiving anticoagulants could be at higher risk of compressive haematoma with neuraxial anaesthesia use. The phase III RECORD programme compared rivaroxaban with enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery in more than 12,500 patients. This observational analysis evaluated the risk of neuraxial haematoma after neuraxial anaesthesia in patients receiving rivaroxaban or enoxaparin using pooled RECORD1-4 data. METHODS: The incidences of intraspinal bleeding or haemorrhagic puncture were recorded as part of the criteria for major bleeding (the primary safety outcome in the RECORD studies). Incidences of allogeneic transfusion and venous thromboembolism by type of anaesthesia were also recorded. RESULTS: No compressive haematomas occurred in rivaroxaban-treated patients (10 mg once daily started 6-8 h after surgery) who underwent neuraxial anaesthesia (n = 4086). Among enoxaparin-treated patients (n = 4090), one compressive spinal haematoma requiring laminectomy occurred after epidural catheter removal in an elderly female patient with renal insufficiency undergoing total knee replacement. Total venous thromboembolism rates did not differ according to type of anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Although no issues were observed with the use of neuraxial anaesthesia in this population of 4086 patients receiving rivaroxaban after total hip or knee replacement, it is important to remain aware of the risk of compressive haematoma. This may be of particular concern in elderly patients with renal insufficiency receiving an anticoagulant predominantly eliminated via the kidneys.

Absence of clinically relevant interactions between rivaroxaban--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor--and digoxin or atorvastatin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate potential interactions between rivaroxaban, an oral direct Factor Xa inhibitor approved for the management of thromboembolic disorders, and digoxin or atorvastatin. METHODS: Two randomized, phase 1 clinical trials were undertaken in healthy men to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin or atorvastatin, and the safety of these drug combinations. RESULTS: Steady-state rivaroxaban did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile of steady-state digoxin (n = 17). Digoxin did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetic profile of single-dose rivaroxaban and had minimal effects on rivaroxaban-induced inhibition of Factor Xa activity and prolongation of clotting time. Similarly, steady-state atorvastatin did not affect the pharmacokinetic profile or the pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban and vice versa (n = 19). All drugs (alone or in combination) were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: There were no clinically relevant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and digoxin, or between rivaroxaban and atorvastatin, suggesting that rivaroxaban can be coadministered with either drug. This study also confirmed that rivaroxaban does not interact with substrates for permeability (P)-glycoprotein alone (digoxin) or P-glycoprotein and cytochrome P(450) (CYP)3A4 (atorvastatin).

Metabolism and excretion of rivaroxaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, in rats, dogs, and humans.

Rivaroxaban is a novel, oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. The objective of this study was to investigate the in vivo metabolism and excretion of rivaroxaban in rats, dogs, and humans. Single doses of [(14)C]rivaroxaban (3 and 1 mg/kg) were administered to rats (orally/intravenously) and dogs (orally), respectively. A single oral dose of [(14)C]rivaroxaban (10 mg) was administered to healthy human males (n = 4). Plasma and excreta were collected and profiled for radioactivity. Recovery of total radioactivity was high and > or = 92% in all species. Unchanged rivaroxaban was the major compound in plasma at all time points investigated, across all species. No major or pharmacologically active circulating metabolites were detected. Rivaroxaban and its metabolites were rapidly excreted; urinary excretion of radioactivity was 25 and 52%, and fecal excretion was 67 and 43% of the dose in rats and dogs, respectively. In humans, 66% of the dose was excreted renally (36% unchanged drug) and 28% in the feces. Radioactivity profiles in excreta were similar across species. Three metabolic pathways were identified: oxidative degradation of the morpholinone moiety (major pathway) and hydrolysis of the central amide bond and of the lactam amide bond in the morpholinone ring (minor pathways). M-1, the main metabolite in excreta of all species, was eliminated via both renal and fecal/biliary routes. In total, 82 to 89% of the dose administered was assigned to unchanged rivaroxaban and its metabolites in the excreta of rats, dogs, and humans.

Population model of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rivaroxaban--an oral, direct factor xa inhibitor--in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Rivaroxaban (BAY 59-7939) is an oral, direct Factor Xa (FXa) inhibitor being developed for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders. This analysis aimed to define population models for the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) ofrivaroxaban in healthy males. METHODS: Non-linear, mixed-effect modeling was used to analyze rivaroxaban plasma concentration and PD data (FXa activity and clotting tests) from subjects in a phase I, multiple-ascending-dose study. Subjects received 5 mg rivaroxaban once, twice or three times daily, or 10, 20 or 30 mg rivaroxaban twice daily. RESULTS: The population PK of rivaroxaban were well described by an oral, two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination from the central compartment. Population mean estimates for apparent oral clearance and volume of distribution for the central compartment were 9.2 1/h and 55 1, respectively, with moderate inter-individual variability (17.4% and 30.7%, respectively). Total volume of distribution for rivaroxaban at steady state was approximately 70 1. Residual (unexplained) variability was 25%. FXa activity correlated with rivaroxaban plasma concentrations following an inhibitory Emax model; prothrombin time (PT) and rivaroxaban plasma concentrations correlated with a linear model, with a slope of 4.6 s/(100 microg/1). Inter-individual variability was low for the correlation with PT. The models derived were used to define sampling windows for population PK/PD modeling in Phase II studies. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis confirms that rivaroxaban has predictable, dose-proportional PK and PD. The linear correlation between rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and PT suggests that this test might be useful to assess rivaroxaban exposure in patients, if required.

Dose-related hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of the calcium promoter BAY y 5959 in the presence or absence of congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the cardiovascular effects of BAY y 5959, a calcium promoter modulating myocardial calcium channels, in the presence or absence of congestive heart failure. BACKGROUND: There is still a clinical need for short-term administration of intravenous positive inotropes. BAY y 5959 was developed as a new approach to increase myocardial performance by selectively enhancing calcium influx in the myocytes. METHODS: Forty-one patients (21 without and 20 with congestive heart failure) were studied in an open label, dose-ranging study. Hemodynamic variables (including left ventricular [LV] angiography) and plasma samples were obtained at baseline and after 20 min of intravenous infusion of BAY y 5959 at doses ranging from 0.25 to 4.5 microg/kg body weight per min. RESULTS: In both study groups, BAY y 5959 produced dose-dependent increases in the indexes of inotropic state, without affecting isovolumetric relaxation rate. The magnitude of the response was comparable in patients with or without heart failure (average 38% increase in maximal first derivative of LV pressure [dP/dt max] at plasma levels of 100 microg/liter). BAY y 5959 also induced mild but statistically significant bradycardia and significantly decreased end-systolic volume while producing a leftward shift of the pressure-volume loop. Mean aortic pressure was unaffected at doses up to 3.0 microg/kg per min, and cardiac index improved in patients with heart failure at doses of 2.0 microg/kg per min (+23%, p < 0.05). However, at a dose of 4.5 microg/kg per min, mean aortic pressure and LV systolic wall stress increased, suggesting systemic vasoconstriction. The QT interval was also prolonged significantly at most doses. CONCLUSIONS: BAY y 5959 exhibits positive inotropic effects in patients with and without heart failure. The optimal response--combining bradycardia, reduced preload and improved cardiac output--appeared to be achieved at a dose of approximately 2.0 microg/kg per min. The impact of QT prolongation with regard to potential antiarrhythmic or proarrhythmic effects is unclear at this time.