Effect of continuous positive airway pressure therapy on infectious complications in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a well-established, widely used and effective treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Unfortunately, side effects are frequent during CPAP treatment. OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the effects of CPAP on infectious complications in patients with OSAS. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the kinds and rate of infections of the upper airway in 246 consecutive patients (mean age, 59.7 years) with polysomnographically verified OSAS using CPAP with or without a heated humidifier and compared them with OSAS patients who received non-CPAP therapy. RESULTS: Of the 246 patients, 40 received conservative therapy and 206 CPAP treatment, 36 of them with a heated humidifier. The mean follow-up period of the study group was 165.4 +/- 92.1 weeks and did not differ between the three groups. Infectious diseases were frequent in all three groups, but patients using CPAP without humidifier suffered from upper airway infections significantly more frequently than controls (42.9 vs. 25%; p < 0.05), and more patients on CPAP therapy with humidifier than controls (22.2 vs. 2.5%; p < 0.01) reported an increased rate of upper airway infections since initiation of CPAP therapy or diagnosis of OSAS. Especially patients using a hot water bath humidifier who cleaned their devices inadequately had significantly more upper airway infections since diagnosis (57.1 vs. 20%; p < 0.05) or during the past 6 months (52.4 vs. 13.3%; p < 0.05) than patients who regularly cleaned CPAP machines, humidifiers and ventilatory circuits. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that patients using CPAP therapy either with or without heated humidity seem to be at an increased risk of upper airway infections compared to conservatively treated patients.

Use of hyperbaric bupivacaine with epinephrine for spinal anesthesia in infants.

Previous studies have established the efficacy of spinal anesthesia in infants with hyperbaric lidocaine, hyperbaric tetracaine and isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine. Use of the commercially available hyperbaric spinal anesthesia solution of 0.75% bupivacaine in 8.25% dextrose has not heretofore been documented in this patient population. We present a series of 12 cases in which this hyperbaric bupivacaine solution with epinephrine was used for spinal anesthesia in children younger than 8 months of age.

Extent of blockade with various approaches to the lumbar plexus.

The extent of blockade when four different techniques were used for blocking the lumbar plexus was prospectively evaluated in 80 adult patients. The extent of blockade was measured by testing motor function of all nerves except the lateral and posterior femoral cutaneous nerves, which were evaluated by pinprick response. The posterior approaches of Dekrey at L3 (n = 20) and Chayen at L4-5 (n = 20) proved similarly effective in producing blockade of the femoral, obturator, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves, as well as the nerves to the psoas muscle. The anterior approach of Winnie (femoral sheath or 3-in-1 block) using paresthesia (n = 20) or peripheral nerve stimulation (n = 20) proved effective in producing blockade of the femoral and lateral femoral cutaneous nerves, but ineffective for obturator nerve blockade. None of the four techniques produced blockade of the sacral plexus. Perhaps our means of assessing blockade (motor) is what produced the difference between our findings and those of others.