RESUMO
Up to now, little has been known about backfat thickness (BFT) in dairy cattle. The objective of this study was to investigate the lactation curve and genetic parameters for BFT as well as its relationship with body condition score (BCS) and milk yield (MKG). For this purpose, a dataset was analysed including phenotypic observations of 1929 German Holstein cows for BFT, BCS and MKG recorded on a single research dairy farm between September 2005 and December 2022. Additionally, pedigree and genomic information was available. Lactation curves were predicted and genetic parameters were estimated for all traits in first to third lactation using univariate random regression models. For BCS, lactation curves had nadirs at 94 DIM, 101 DIM and 107 DIM in first, second and third lactation. By contrast, trajectories of BFT showed lowest values later in lactation at 129 DIM, 117 DIM and 120 DIM in lactation numbers 1 to 3, respectively. Although lactation curves of BCS and BFT had similar shapes, the traits showed distinct sequence of curves for lactation number 2 and 3. Cows in third lactation had highest BCS, whereas highest BFT values were found for second parity animals. Average heritabilities were 0.315 ± 0.052, 0.297 ± 0.048 and 0.332 ± 0.061 for BCS in lactation number 1 to 3, respectively. Compared to that, BFT had considerably higher heritability in all lactation numbers with estimates ranging between 0.357 ± 0.028 and 0.424 ± 0.034. Pearson correlation coefficients between estimated breeding values for the 3 traits were negative between MKG with both BCS (r = -0.245 to -0.322) and BFT (r = -0.163 to -0.301). Correlation between traits BCS and BFT was positive and consistently high (r = 0.719 to 0.738). Overall, the results of this study suggest that BFT and BCS show genetic differences in dairy cattle, which might be due to differences in depletion and accumulation of body reserves measured by BFT and BCS. Therefore, routine recording of BFT on practical dairy farms could provide valuable information beyond BCS measurements and might be useful, for example, to better assess the nutritional status of cows.
RESUMO
In dairy cattle production, it is important to understand how inbreeding affects production, fertility, and health traits. However, there is still limited use of genomic information to estimate inbreeding, despite advancements in genotyping technologies. To address this gap, we investigated the impact of inbreeding on German Holstein dairy cattle using both pedigree-based and genomic-based inbreeding estimators. We employed one method based on pedigree information (Fped) together with 6 genomic-based methods, including 3 GCTA estimators (Fhat1, Fhat2, Fhat3), VanRaden's first method (FVR1, with observed allele frequencies and FVR0.5 when allele frequencies are set to 0.5), and one based on runs of homozygosity (Froh). Data from 24,489 cows with both phenotypes and genotypes were used, with a pedigree including 232,780 animals born between 1970 and 2018. We analyzed the effects of inbreeding depression on production, fertility, and health traits separately, using single-trait linear animal models as well as threshold models to account for the binary nature of the health traits. For the health traits, we transformed solutions from the liability scale to a probability scale for easier interpretation. Our results showed that the mean inbreeding coefficients from all estimators ranged from -0.003 to 0.243, with negative values observed for most genomic-based methods. We found out that a 1% increase in inbreeding caused a depression ranging from 25.94 kg (Fhat1) to 40.62 kg (Fhat3), 1.18 kg (Fhat2) to 1.70 kg (Fhat3), 0.90 kg (Fhat2) to 1.45 kg (Froh and Fhat3), 0.19 (Fped) to 0.34 d (Fhat3) for 305 d milk yield, fat, protein, and calving interval respectively. The health traits showed slight changes when inbreeding was gradually increased by 5% with digital dermatitis showing rather a contrasting trend to that of mastitis which reduced the more an animal was inbred. Overall, our study highlights the importance of considering both pedigree-based and genomic-based inbreeding estimators when assessing the impact on inbreeding, emphasizing that not all inbreeding is harmful.
RESUMO
The decline in farm revenue due to volatile milk prices has led to an increase in the use of beef semen in dairy herds. While this strategy ("Beef-on-dairy" (BoD)) can have economic benefits, it can also lead to unintended consequences affecting animal welfare. Semen sale trends from breeding organizations depict increasing sales of beef semen across the globe. Calves born from such breeding strategies can perform better when compared to purebred dairy calves, especially in terms of meat quality and growth traits. The Beef-on-dairy strategy can lead to unintentional negative impacts including an increase in gestation length, and increased dystocia and stillbirth rates. Studies in this regard have found the highest gestation length for Limousin crossbred calves followed by calves from the Angus breed. This increase in gestation length can lead to economic losses ranging from 3 to 5 US$ per animal for each additional day. In terms of the growth performance of crossbred animals, literature studies are inconclusive due to the vast differences in farming structure across the regions. But almost all the studies agree regarding improvement in the meat quality in terms of color, fiber type, and intra-muscular fat content for crossbred animals. Utilization of genomic selection, and development of specialized Beef-on-dairy indexes for the sires, can be a viable strategy to make selection easier for the farmers.
