Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control ; 11(1): 106, 2022 08 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35987780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Logistical and economic barriers hamper community-level surveillance for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in low-income countries. Latrines are commonly used in these settings and offer a low-cost source of surveillance samples. It is unclear, however, whether antimicrobial resistance prevalence estimates from latrine samples reflect estimates generated from randomly sampled people. METHODS: We compared the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant enteric bacteria from stool samples of people residing in randomly selected households within Kibera-an informal urban settlement in Kenya-to estimates from latrine samples within the same community. Fecal samples were collected between November 2015 and Jan 2016. Presumptive Escherichia coli isolates were collected from each household stool sample (n = 24) and each latrine sample (n = 48), resulting in 8935 and 8210 isolates, respectively. Isolates were tested for resistance to nine antibiotics using the replica-plating technique. Correlation- and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) tests were used to compare results. RESULTS: Overall, the prevalence values obtained from latrine samples closely reflected those from stool samples, particularly for low-prevalence (< 15%) resistance phenotypes. Similarly, the distribution of resistance phenotypes was similar between latrine and household samples (r > 0.6; K-S p-values > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although latrine samples did not perfectly estimate household antimicrobial resistance prevalence, they were highly correlated and thus could be employed as low-cost samples to monitor trends in antimicrobial resistance, detect the emergence of new resistance phenotypes and assess the impact of community interventions.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Prevalência , Banheiros
2.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233413, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32463823

RESUMO

The use of veterinary antibiotics is largely unregulated in low-income countries. Consequently, food producers rarely observe drug withdrawal periods, contributing to drug residues in food products. Drug residues in milk can cause immunogenic reactions in people, and selectively favor antibiotic-resistant bacteria in unpasteurized products. We quantified the prevalence of antibiotic residues in pasteurized and unpasteurized milk, and antibiotic-resistant bacteria from unpasteurized milk sold within Kibera, an informal settlement in Nairobi, Kenya. Ninety-five milk samples (74 pasteurized and 21 unpasteurized) were collected from shops, street vendors or vending machines, and tested for the presence of ß-lactam and tetracycline residues using IDEXX SNAP kits. MacConkey agar without- and with antibiotics (ampicillin, 32 µg/ml; tetracycline, 16 µg/ml) was used to enumerate presumptive E. coli based on colony morphology (colony forming units per ml, CFU/ml). ß-lactam and tetracycline residues were found in 7.4% and 3.2% of all milk samples, respectively. Residues were more likely to be present in unpasteurized milk samples (5/21, 23.8%) compared to pasteurized samples (5/75, 6.8%); P = 0.039. Two thirds of unpasteurized samples (14/21, 66.7%) contained detectable numbers of presumptive E. coli (mean 3.5 Log10 CFU/ml) and of these, 92.8% (13/14) were positive for ampicillin- (mean 3.2 Log10 CFU/ml) and 50% (7/14) for tetracycline-resistant E. coli (mean 3.1 Log10 CFU/ml). We found no relationship between the presence of antibiotic residues and the presence of antibiotic-resistant E. coli in unpasteurized milk sold within Kibera (P > 0.2).


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/análise , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Leite , Animais , Bactérias , Resíduos de Drogas/análise , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli , Humanos , Quênia , Leite/química , Leite/microbiologia , Pasteurização/estatística & dados numéricos , Tetraciclina/análise , beta-Lactamas/análise
3.
J Microbiol Methods ; 136: 71-77, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28323065

RESUMO

Investigators often rely on studies of Escherichia coli to characterize the burden of antibiotic resistance in a clinical or community setting. To determine if prevalence estimates for antibiotic resistance are sensitive to sample handling and interpretive criteria, we collected presumptive E. coli isolates (24 or 95 per stool sample) from a community in an urban informal settlement in Kenya. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to nine antibiotics using agar breakpoint assays and results were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models. We observed a <3-fold difference between prevalence estimates based on freshly isolated bacteria when compared to isolates collected from unprocessed fecal samples or fecal slurries that had been stored at 4°C for up to 7days. No time-dependence was evident (P>0.1). Prevalence estimates did not differ for five distinct E. coli colony morphologies on MacConkey agar plates (P>0.2). Successive re-plating of samples for up to five consecutive days had little to no impact on prevalence estimates. Finally, culturing E. coli under different conditions (with 5% CO2 or micro-aerobic) did not affect estimates of prevalence. For the conditions tested in these experiments, minor modifications in sample processing protocols are unlikely to bias estimates of the prevalence of antibiotic-resistance for fecal E. coli.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Fezes/microbiologia , Prevalência , Contagem de Colônia Microbiana , Meios de Cultura , Resistência Microbiana a Medicamentos , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Infecções por Escherichia coli/diagnóstico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Humanos , Quênia/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Tamanho da Amostra
4.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 9(12): e0004212, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633656

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Enteric fever due to Salmonella Typhi (typhoid fever) occurs in urban areas with poor sanitation. While direct fecal-oral transmission is thought to be the predominant mode of transmission, recent evidence suggests that indirect environmental transmission may also contribute to disease spread. METHODS: Data from a population-based infectious disease surveillance system (28,000 individuals followed biweekly) were used to map the spatial pattern of typhoid fever in Kibera, an urban informal settlement in Nairobi Kenya, between 2010-2011. Spatial modeling was used to test whether variations in topography and accumulation of surface water explain the geographic patterns of risk. RESULTS: Among children less than ten years of age, risk of typhoid fever was geographically heterogeneous across the study area (p = 0.016) and was positively associated with lower elevation, OR = 1.87, 95% CI (1.36-2.57), p <0.001. In contrast, the risk of typhoid fever did not vary geographically or with elevation among individuals more than ten years of age [corrected]. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide evidence of indirect, environmental transmission of typhoid fever among children, a group with high exposure to fecal pathogens in the environment. Spatially targeting sanitation interventions may decrease enteric fever transmission.


Assuntos
Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa , Febre Tifoide/transmissão , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Geografia , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Quênia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Áreas de Pobreza , Medição de Risco , Análise Espacial , População Urbana , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...