Enhanced safety surveillance of STAMARIL® yellow fever vaccine provided under the expanded access investigational new drug program in the USA.

BACKGROUND: YF-VAX® (Sanofi, Swiftwater, PA), a live, attenuated vaccine based on the yellow fever (YF) substrain 17D-204, is the only YF vaccine licensed in the USA. Manufacturing disruption of YF-VAX and anticipated depletion of the US supply by mid-2017 led to the importation of another YF vaccine, STAMARIL® (Sanofi, France), into the USA under an expanded access investigational new drug program (EAP) to fulfil the public health need for YF vaccination. As part of this program, Sanofi collected enhanced safety surveillance data following vaccination with STAMARIL. Here, we report the results of the enhanced safety surveillance. METHODS: STAMARIL vaccine was offered to those aged ≥9 months at high risk of YF. Vaccine recipients (or parents/guardians) were instructed to report suspected adverse reactions, any serious adverse events (SAEs) including adverse events of special interest [AESI] occurring after vaccination regardless of suspected relationship, and any inadvertent exposure in pregnancy or breastfeeding within 14 days of vaccination. The AESIs monitored were anaphylaxis, neurotropic disease (YEL-AND) and viscerotropic disease (YEL-AVD). RESULTS: Overall, 627 079 individuals received STAMARIL from May 2017 through June 2021; of these, 1308 (0.2%) reported at least one AE, of which 122 reported at least one SAE. There were seven cases of YEL-AND and three cases of YEL-AVD reported, for reporting rates of 1.1 and 0.5 per 100 000 vaccine recipients, respectively. One vaccine recipient developed an anaphylactic reaction (reporting rate: 0.16 per 100 000). No safety concerns were identified from inadvertent vaccine exposure during pregnancy (41 pregnant women) or potential neonatal exposure via breast milk (four exposed infants). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the utility of STAMARIL in the EAP as an alternative solution for the YF vaccine shortage in the USA. SAEs were very rare and consistent with the known safety profile of STAMARIL.

Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of implementing a 'pre-vaccination screening' strategy with the dengue vaccine in Puerto Rico.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended 'pre-vaccination screening' as its preferred implementation strategy when using the licensed dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV; Dengvaxia, Sanofi), so that only individuals with previous dengue infection are vaccinated. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended use of CYD-TDV to prevent dengue in children with previous laboratory-confirmed dengue infection in regions where dengue is endemic. Here, we evaluate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of a 'pre-vaccination screening' strategy in Puerto Rico. METHODS: The current analysis builds upon a previously published transmission model used to assess the benefits/risks associated with dengue vaccination. For 'pre-vaccination screening', three alternative testing methods were assessed: one using an immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) dengue serotest, another with dengue serotesting using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and one using both sequentially (as recommended in Puerto Rico). The time horizon considered was 10 years. RESULTS: In Puerto Rico, the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted for 'pre-vaccination screening' with an ELISA-based program, RDT-based program, and both sequentially would be a median 1,192 (95% CI: 716-2,232), 2,812 (95% CI: 1,579-5,019), and 1,017 (95% CI: 561-1,738), respectively. These benefits would arise from the reduction in cases: median 24,961 (95% CI: 17,480-36,782), 58,273 (95% CI: 40,729-84,796), 20,775 (95% CI: 14,637-30,374) fewer cases, respectively. The cost per DALY averted from a payer perspective would be US$12,518 (95 %CI: US$4,749-26,922), US$10,047 (95% CI: US$3,350-23,852), and US$12,334 (95% CI: US$4,965-26,444), respectively. All three strategies would be cost saving from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the WHO and CDC 'pre-vaccination screening' guidance for CYD-TDV implementation. In Puerto Rico, regardless of the testing strategy and even with a relatively low rate of testing, it would be cost-effective from a payer perspective and cost saving from a societal perspective.

Addressing a Yellow Fever Vaccine Shortage - United States, 2016-2017.

Recent manufacturing problems resulted in a shortage of the only U.S.-licensed yellow fever vaccine. This shortage is expected to lead to a complete depletion of yellow fever vaccine available for the immunization of U.S. travelers by mid-2017. CDC, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Sanofi Pasteur are collaborating to ensure a continuous yellow fever vaccine supply in the United States. As part of this collaboration, Sanofi Pasteur submitted an expanded access investigational new drug (eIND) application to FDA in September 2016 to allow for the importation and use of an alternative yellow fever vaccine manufactured by Sanofi Pasteur France, with safety and efficacy comparable to the U.S.-licensed vaccine; the eIND was accepted by FDA in October 2016. The implementation of this eIND protocol included developing a systematic process for selecting a limited number of clinic sites to provide the vaccine. CDC and Sanofi Pasteur will continue to communicate with the public and other stakeholders, and CDC will provide a list of locations that will be administering the replacement vaccine at a later date.

Epidemiology of invasive pneumococcal disease among high-risk adults since the introduction of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine for children.

BACKGROUND: Certain chronic diseases increase risk for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and are indications for receipt of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23). Since the pediatric introduction of 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2000, incidence of IPD among adults has declined. The relative magnitude of these indirect effects among persons with and without PPV23 indications is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated IPD incidence among adults with and without PPV23 indications using population- and laboratory-based data collected during 1998-2009 and estimates of the denominator populations with PPV23 indications from the National Health Interview Survey. We compared rates before and after PCV7 use by age, race, PPV23 indication, and serotype. RESULTS: The proportion of adult IPD cases with PPV23 indications increased from 51% before to 61% after PCV7 introduction (P < .0001). PCV7-serotype IPD declined among all race, age, and PPV23 indication strata, ranging from 82% to 97%. Overall IPD rates declined in most strata, by up to 65%. However, incidence remained highest among adults with PPV23 indications compared with those without (34.9 vs 8.8 cases per 100 000 population, respectively). Apart from age ≥65 years, diabetes is now the most common indication for PPV23 (20% of all cases vs 10% of cases in 1998-1999). CONCLUSIONS: Although IPD rates have declined among adults, adults with underlying conditions remain at increased risk of IPD and comprise a larger proportion of adult IPD cases in 2009 compared with 2000. A continued increase in the prevalence of diabetes among US adults could lead to increased burden of pneumococcal disease.

Adverse Events Following Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccination in Children: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

BACKGROUND: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' recommendations for influenza vaccination of children have expanded from the long-standing recommendation to vaccinate high-risk children aged ≥6 months, to vaccinating all 6- to 23-month-olds (2004), 2- to 4-year-olds (2006), and 5- to 18-year-olds (2008). OBJECTIVE: To identify new or unexpected adverse events (AEs) after trivalent inactivated vaccine (TIV) in children. METHODS: We analyzed reports after TIV to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System from 1990-2006 in children aged 2 to 17 years, and from the 2008-2009 influenza season in children aged 5 to 17 years. Empiric Bayesian data mining techniques were used to identify new or unexpected AEs during 1990-2006. RESULTS: During 1990-2006, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received 2054 reports of children aged 2 to 17 years with a peak in the 2003-2004 influenza season. In 2008-2009, 506 reports describing 5 to 17 year olds were received. The serious reports of tests performed after TIV were approximately 10% of all reports from 2001-2006, and 6% of the reports in the 2008-2009 season. Data mining showed an increased proportion of medication errors and Guillain Barré Syndrome (GBS). The findings of GBS could not be interpreted as causally related to vaccination. Among 201 reports of medication error, 94% had no AE reported other than the medication error itself. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, we found no unexpected AEs. Our review of medication error and GBS reports suggests that ongoing monitoring in these areas is appropriate.