Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 49(1 Pt A): 102012, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37549814

RESUMO

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has increasingly been utilized in patients with aortic insufficiency (AI) with insufficient data on its safety. The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) was queried to identify patients undergoing TAVI for AI. Net clinical events (composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, major bleeding) and procedural complications were assessed using a propensity-score matched (PSM) analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR). A total of 185,703 (AI 3873, aortic stenosis [AS] 181,830) patients were included in the analysis. Due to a significant difference in the baseline characteristics, a matched sample of 7929 patients (AI 3873, AS 4056) was selected. At index admission, the adjusted odds of in-hospital NACE (aOR 2.0, 95% CI 1.59-2.51), mortality (aOR 3.06, 95% CI 2.38-5.47), major bleeding (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.13-2.06) and valvular complications (aOR 9.48, 95% CI 6.73-13.38) were significantly higher in patients undergoing TAVI for AI compared with those undergoing TAVI for AS. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of NACE, mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and need for permanent pacemaker implantation at 30- and 180-days follow-up. TAVI in AI was associated with a higher risk of periprocedural NACE, mortality, and major bleeding. The risk of these complications attenuated at 30- and 180-day readmission.


Assuntos
Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica , Estenose da Valva Aórtica , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter , Humanos , Substituição da Valva Aórtica Transcateter/efeitos adversos , Readmissão do Paciente , Fatores de Risco , Estenose da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/epidemiologia , Insuficiência da Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Hemorragia/etiologia , Valva Aórtica/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento , Implante de Prótese de Valva Cardíaca/efeitos adversos
2.
Curr Probl Cardiol ; 48(8): 101735, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37044270

RESUMO

The effectiveness of polypill therapy in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disorders is still unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of polypill therapy in reducing cardiovascular risk factors. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated polypill therapy for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. We included 18 RCTs with a total of 20,463 participants in our analysis. Pooled effect estimates were reported as Odds ratios (ORs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) using a random-effects model. Polypill therapy was associated with a statistically significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (OR: -0.33, 95% CI [-0.64, -0.03]; P-value = 0.03), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (OR: -0.70, 95% CI [-1.20, -0.21]; P-value = 0.005), and total cholesterol level (OR: -1.25, 95% CI [-1.82, -0.68]; P-value < 0.0001). Polypill therapy also showed improved adherence (OR 2.18, 95% CI [1.47, 3.24]; P-value = 0.0001). However, there was no statistically significant benefit in the reduction of all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, and LDL-c levels. The use of polypill therapy is associated with a statistically significant reduction in SBP, DBP, and total cholesterol levels, as well as improved adherence. Further research is needed to determine its impact on hard clinical outcomes such as mortality and major cardiovascular events.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Hipertensão , Humanos , Pressão Sanguínea , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Colesterol/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
3.
JACC Adv ; 2(2): 100271, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38938299

RESUMO

Background: The use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with aortic valve disease excluded from clinical trials has increased with no large-scale data on its safety. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the trend of utilization and adjusted outcomes of TAVI in clinical trials excluded (CTE) vs clinical trials included TAVI (CTI-TAVI) patients. Methods: We used the National Readmission Database (2015-2019) to identify 15 CTE-TAVI conditions. A propensity score-matched analysis was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of net adverse clinical events (composite of mortality, stroke, and major bleeding) in patients undergoing CTE-TAVI vs CTI-TAVI. Results: Among the 223,238 patients undergoing TAVI, CTE-TAVI was used in 41,408 patients (18.5%). The yearly trend showed a steep increase in CTE-TAVI utilization (P = 0.026). At index admission, the adjusted odds of net adverse clinical events (aOR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.73-1.95) and its components, including mortality (aOR: 2.94, 95% CI: 2.66-3.24), stroke (aOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34), and major bleeding (aOR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.36-1.63) were significantly higher in CTE-TAVI compared with CTI-TAVI. Among the individual contraindications to clinical trial enrollment in the CTE-TAVI, patients with bicuspid aortic valve, leukopenia, and peptic ulcer disease appeared to have similar outcomes compared with CTI-TAVI, while patients with end-stage renal disease, bioprosthetic aortic valves, and coagulopathy had a higher readmission rate at 30 and 180 days. Conclusions: CTE-TAVI utilization has increased significantly over the 4-year study period. Patients undergoing CTE-TAVI have a higher likelihood of mortality, stroke, and bleeding than those undergoing CTI-TAVI.

4.
JACC Adv ; 2(1): 100167, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38939027

RESUMO

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis and cancer are often denied surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) due to a prohibitive risk of perioperative mortality. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with severe aortic stenosis and cancer. Methods: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2002-2018) was used to study the outcomes of TAVI vs SAVR in patients with active or prior history of prostate, lung, colorectal, breast, and renal cancer. A propensity score-matched analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and its components. Results: A total of 1,505,995 crude population and a subset of 345,413 noncancer and 33,565 cancer patients were selected on propensity score-matched analysis. The yearly trend showed a steep increase in the utilization of TAVI. Compared with SAVR, TAVI had a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in prostate cancer, while there was no difference among other cancer types. Patients with lung (aOR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.43-0.97) and prostate cancer (aOR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.66-0.96) had lower, while colorectal cancer (aOR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.08-1.90) had higher odds of MACE with TAVI. The incidence of major bleeding was lower with TAVI (except for lung cancer), while the risk of stroke was similar (except for colorectal cancer) between TAVI and SAVR. Conclusions: TAVI in patients with prostate, breast, lung, and renal cancer appears to be a reasonable alternative to SAVR with lower or similar risks of mortality and MACE.

5.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 6(5): ytac191, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35592751

RESUMO

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a manifestation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which results in many different complications including left ventricular (LV) thrombi. Case summary: We present a 30-year-old female presenting with chest pain and shortness of breath. Patient had an extensive history including heart failure with an ejection fraction 15-20% and COVID-19 2 months ago. Echocardiogram revealed a 3.3 cm × 1.7 cm LV thrombus which was not present 4 months ago before her diagnosis of COVID-19. The LV thrombus embolized resulting in an embolus extending from the distal infrarenal abdominal aorta to the common iliac arteries bilaterally. Repeat COVID pre-procedure was positive. She underwent bilateral femoral artery cutdown, bilateral iliac artery embolectomy, superficial femoral artery embolectomy, and bilateral lower extremity fasciotomy. An extensive workup for the aetiology of the LV thrombus turned out to be negative and COVID-19 was deemed to be the aetiology of the thrombus. The patient was bridged from apixaban to warfarin and was successfully discharged within a few weeks. Discussion: Hypercoagulability is a known complication of COVID-19 causing thrombi in various parts of the body including the LV. Early recognition with echocardiography, especially in patients with heart failure, and prompt treatment is key to avoid further complications such as embolization.

6.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 4(5): 1-4, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33216825

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) is a rare manifestation of a number of systemic diseases, which include advanced malignancy and hypercoagulable states. CASE SUMMARY: We present a 67-year-old woman who had presented with chest pain and heart failure. Eight years ago, she had a successful Whipple resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Echocardiography revealed mitral valve vegetations with negative blood cultures. She had multiple infarcts in the kidney, spleen, and brain. She was found to have a mass in the left 8th rib, consistent with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy. Ultimately, a diagnosis of NBTE was made after excluding other causes for her presentation. Because of her general poor condition, she expressed the wish for palliative care and later died 28 days after presentation. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the possibility of NBTE in patients successfully treated for pancreatic adenocarcinoma and highlights the consideration of this relatively rare differential in patients with a previously treated malignancy presenting with heart failure.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...