Premature infants with gestational age less than 25 weeks require increased ophthalmology resources for retinopathy of prematurity.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear how increasing survival of low gestational age (GA) infants affects ophthalmologic screening and treatment rates for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). This study compared the examination and treatment rates of infants born at GA of <25 weeks and those born at GA of at least 25 weeks. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who met institutional ROP screening criteria and were admitted to two neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) from January 2017 to June 2020. Variables analyzed were GA, birth weight, number of ophthalmology examinations, worst stage of ROP, presence of type 1 ROP, and comorbidities associated with ROP. The χ2, Fisher exact, and two-tailed t tests, as well as univariate and multivariable logistic regression, were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Compared to the GA≥25 group, the GA<25 group had a higher number of total exams (10 vs 4.3 [P < 0.001]), higher average worst stage of ROP (1.4 vs 0.3 [P < 0.001]) and higher rate of type 1 ROP (21% vs 1.4% [P < 0.001]), as well as higher mortality (37% vs 8.11% [P < 0. 001]). Multivariable logistic regression analysis controlling for GA, sepsis, and number of transfusions revealed that only GA was significantly associated with developing type 1 ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Infants with GA <25 weeks had more severe ROP and required significantly more ophthalmologic examinations than GA ≥25. It is important for ROP services to plan for this increased screening load, especially if the number of such lower-weight infants in their NICUs increases.

The time and financial ramifications of providing services for retinopathy of prematurity at a single inner-city institution in the United States: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a sight-threatening disease that requires strict, scheduled screening and timely treatment. Examining infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) confers an added burden for ophthalmologists whose practices are predominantly outpatient. We sought to evaluate the time required for ROP services and to approximate compensation to better understand the implications of providing this crucial service. METHODS: The ROP coordinator tracked the time ophthalmologists spent providing ROP services at two NICUs (2018-2020). Estimated revenue was calculated using Medicaid Current Procedural Terminology codes. Total ophthalmologist time was from NICU arrival to departure; travel time was estimated as 45 minutes. RESULTS: The ophthalmologists cumulatively spent on average 98 and 108 hours yearly for screening only (SO) and screening plus treatment (ST), respectively; this increased to 164 and 181 hours yearly with travel time, respectively. Estimated annual Medicaid physician reimbursements were $15,246 ($156/hour) for SO and $19,184 for ST ($177/hour). Actual annual physician reimbursements were $39,655 ($405/hour) for SO and $53,385 for ST ($492/hour). With travel time, reimbursements decreased by about 40%. A hypothetical full-time ROP practice would generate annual physician salaries of $204,732 for SO and $232,807 for ST. With travel time, this decreases to $122,452 and $139,379, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Performing ROP services requires substantial time, especially when including travel among facilities. This study highlights the extensive requirements for the critical task of decreasing ROP blindness.

The Cost-Effectiveness of a Telemedicine Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy in New York City.

Background: A telemedicine screening initiative was implemented by the Montefiore Health System to improve access to eyecare for a multi-ethnic, at-risk population of diabetic patients in a largely underserved urban community in the Bronx, New York. This retrospective, cross-sectional analysis evaluates the societal benefit and financial sustainability of this program by analyzing both cost and revenue generation based on current standard Medicare reimbursement rates. Methods: Non-mydriatic fundus cameras were placed in collaboration with a vendor in eight outpatient primary care sites throughout the Montefiore Health Care System, and data was collected between June 2014 and July 2016. Fundus photos were electronically transmitted to a central reading center to be systematically reviewed and coded by faculty ophthalmologists, and patients were subsequently scheduled for ophthalmic evaluation based upon a predetermined treatment algorithm. A retrospective chart review of 2251 patients was performed utilizing our electronic medical record system (Epic Systems, Verona WI). Revenue was projected utilizing standard Medicare rates for our region while societal benefit was calculated using quality adjusted life years (QALY). Results: Of the 2251 patient charts reviewed, 791 patients (35.1%) were seen by Montefiore ophthalmologists within a year of the original screening date. Estimated revenue generated by these visits was $276,800, with the majority from the treatment of retinal disease ($208,535), and the remainder from other ophthalmic conditions detected in the fundus photos ($68,265). There was a societal benefit of 14.66 quality adjusted life years (QALYs) with an estimated value of $35,471/QALY. Conclusion: This telemedicine initiative was successful in identifying many patients with diabetic retinopathy and other ophthalmic conditions who may otherwise not have been formally evaluated. Our analysis demonstrates the program to generate a downstream revenue of nearly $280K with a cost benefit below <50% of the threshold of $100,000/QALY, and therefore cost-effective in marginalized communities.