Micafungin twice-a-week for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: A controlled cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Invasive Aspergillus infections during the early phase of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment come with morbidity and mortality. The interaction with vincristine hampers first-line azole prophylaxis. We describe the efficacy of an alternative twice-a-week micafungin regimen for Aspergillus prophylaxis. METHODS: Newly diagnosed paediatric patients with ALL treated according to the ALL-11 protocol received micafungin twice-a-week (9 mg/kg/dose [max. 300 mg]) during the induction course (first 35 days of treatment) as part of routine care. A historical control cohort without Aspergillus prophylaxis was used. During the first consolidation course (day 36-79), standard itraconazole prophylaxis was used in both groups. The percentage of proven/probable Aspergillus infections during the induction/first consolidation course was compared between the cohorts. The cumulative incidence of proven/probable Aspergillus infections was estimated using a competing risk model. For safety evaluation, liver laboratory chemistry values were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 169 and 643 paediatric patients with ALL were treated in the micafungin cohort (median age: 4 years [range 1-17]) and historical cohort (median age: 5 years [range 1-17]). The percentage of proven/probable Aspergillus infections was 1·2% (2/169) in the micafungin cohort versus 5·8% (37/643) in the historical cohort (p=0.013; Fisher's exact test). The differences in estimated cumulative incidence were assessed (p=0·014; Gray's test). Although significantly higher ALT/AST values were reported in the micafungin cohort, no clinically relevant side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-a-week micafungin prophylaxis during the induction course significantly reduced the occurrence of proven/probable Aspergillus infections in the early phase of childhood ALL treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of extended dose intervals of micafungin in haematology patients: optimizing antifungal prophylaxis.

Background: Extended dosing intervals for micafungin could overcome the need for hospitalization for antifungal prophylaxis. Objectives: This multicentre, open-label, randomized trial compared the pharmacokinetics of 300 mg of micafungin given twice weekly with 100 mg once daily as antifungal prophylaxis in adult haematology patients at risk of developing invasive fungal disease. Secondary objectives were assessment of adequate exposure with an alternative dosing regimen of micafungin (700 mg once weekly) through Monte Carlo simulations and assessment of safety in this patient population. Patients and methods: Twenty adult patients were randomized to receive either 300 mg of micafungin twice weekly or 100 mg once daily for 8 days. Blood samples were drawn daily and pharmacokinetic curves were determined on days 4/5 and 8. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for both investigated regimens as well as a frequently proposed alternative regimen (700 mg once weekly). Results: The predicted median AUC0-168h (IQR) for a typical patient on the investigated regimens of 100 mg once daily and 300 mg twice weekly and the hypothetical regimen of 700 mg once weekly were 690 (583-829), 596 (485-717) and 704 (585-833) mg·h/L, respectively. Conclusions: We observed comparable exposure with 300 mg of micafungin twice weekly and 100 mg of micafungin once daily. We provide the pharmacokinetic proof for an extended dosing regimen, which now needs to be tested in a clinical trial with hard endpoints.

Pharmacokinetics of caspofungin in ICU patients.

OBJECTIVES: Caspofungin is used for treatment of invasive fungal infections. As the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients can be highly variable, we set out to explore caspofungin PK in ICU patients. METHODS: ICU patients receiving caspofungin were eligible. Patients received a loading dose of 70 mg followed by 50 mg daily (70 mg if body weight >80 kg); they were evaluable upon completion of the first PK curve at day 3. Additionally, daily trough samples were taken and a second PK curve was recorded at day 7. PK analysis was performed using a standard two-stage approach. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were evaluable. Median (range) age and body weight were 71 (45-80) years and 75 (50-99) kg. PK sampling on day 3 (n = 21) resulted in the following median (IQR) parameters: AUC0-24 88.7 (72.2-97.5) mg·h/L; Cmin 2.15 (1.40-2.48) mg/L; Cmax 7.51 (6.05-8.17) mg/L; V 7.72 (6.12-9.01) L; and CL 0.57 (0.54-0.77) L/h. PK sampling on day 7 (n = 13) resulted in AUC0-24 107.2 (90.4-125.3) mg·h/L, Cmin 2.55 (1.82-3.08) mg/L, Cmax 8.65 (7.16-9.34) mg/L, V 7.03 (5.51-7.73) L and CL 0.54 (0.44-0.60) L/h. We did not identify any covariates significantly affecting caspofungin PK in ICU patients (e.g. body weight, albumin, liver function). Caspofungin was well tolerated and no unexpected side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Caspofungin PK in ICU patients showed limited intraindividual and moderate interindividual variability, and caspofungin was well tolerated. A standard two-stage approach did not reveal significant covariates. Our study showed similar caspofungin PK parameters in ICU patients compared with non-critically ill patients.