Outcomes and emergency medical services resource utilization among patients with syncope arriving to the emergency department by ambulance.

OBJECTIVE: Syncope accounts for 1% of emergency department (ED) visits, yet few experience a serious adverse event (SAE). Two-thirds of syncope patients are transported to the ED by ambulance, placing considerable burden on emergency medical services (EMS), and many of these transports may be unnecessary. We estimated the proportion of syncope patients who fell into a low-risk category based on an ED diagnosis of vasovagal syncope and the absence of EMS intervention, hospitalization, or SAE. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective cohort study enrolling adult syncope patients transported to the ED by ambulance over 13 months. We collected demographics and EMS interventions, and followed patients for 30 days to identify all SAE, including death, dysrhythmia, myocardial infarction, aortic dissection, pulmonary embolism, subarachnoid hemorrhage, significant hemorrhage, and related procedural interventions. RESULTS: Of 990 (67.2%) patients transported to the ED by ambulance, 121 had EMS interventions, 137 suffered 30-day SAE, 393 (39.7%; 95%CI 36.6, 42.8) were deemed low risk, 41 patients with vasovagal syncope were lost to follow-up, and 298 patients were diagnosed with non-vasovagal syncope. During transport, 121 (12.2%; 95%CI 10.2, 14.3) patients underwent some EMS intervention, and 137 (14.6%; 95%CI 12.4, 16.9) suffered SAEs within 30 days. CONCLUSION: About 40% of patients transported to the ED by ambulance are at low risk and may not benefit from paramedic care or transport to a hospital. A robust clinical decision tool would help identify patients safe for treat-and-release, diversion to alternative care, or rapid offload into low-acuity ED areas, potentially reducing EMS workload and cost.

OBJECTIF: Les syncopes motivent 1 % des consultations au service des urgences (SU), mais le malaise entraîne peu d'événements indésirables graves (EIG). Ainsi, deux tiers des patients ayant subi une syncope sont transportés en ambulance au SU, ce qui impose un lourd fardeau sur les services médicaux d'urgence (SMU), et pourtant bon nombre de transports effectués seraient non nécessaires. Aussi l'étude visait-elle à estimer la proportion de patients ayant subi une syncope dont l'état serait jugé à faible risque d'après le diagnostic de syncope vasovagale posé au SU ainsi que d'après l'absence d'intervention faite par les SMU, d'hospitalisation ou d'EIG. MÉTHODE: Il s'agit d'une étude prospective de cohortes, multicentrique, menée chez des adultes qui ont subi une syncope et qui ont été transportés en ambulance au SU, sur une période de 13 mois. Ont été recueillies des données démographiques ainsi que les notes sur les interventions effectuées par les SMU; à cela s'ajoute un suivi de 30 jours aux fins de collecte de renseignements sur tout EIG : mort, arythmie, infarctus du myocarde, dissection de l'aorte, embolie pulmonaire, hémorragie sous-arachnoïdienne, hémorragie importante et gestes interventionnels liés aux troubles en question. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 990 patients (67,2 %) ont été transportés en ambulance au SU; sur ce nombre, 121 ont subi des interventions pratiquées par les SMU; 137 ont connu un EIG au cours des 30 jours suivant le malaise; 393 (39,7 %; IC à 95 % : 36,6-42,8) ont été jugés à faible risque; 41 ayant fait une syncope vasovagale ont été perdus de vue durant le suivi; et 298, ont fait une syncope non vasovagale. Durant le transport, 121 patients (12,2 %; IC à 95 % : 10,2-14,3) ont subi une forme quelconque d'intervention par les SMU et, au cours des 30 jours de suivi, 137 (14,6 %; IC à 95 % : 12,4-16,9) ont connu un EIG. CONCLUSION: Environ 40 % des patients transportés en ambulance au SU connaissent un faible risque et, dans leur cas, la prestation de soins paramédicaux ou le transport à l'hôpital pourraient ne pas être nécessaires. Un outil d'aide à la décision clinique qui soit digne de confiance pourrait faciliter le repérage des patients dont l'état se prêterait au traitement suivi du congé, à une orientation vers d'autres types de soins ou à un passage rapide dans des zones de petites urgences, ce qui permettrait à la fois de réduire la charge de travail des SMU ainsi que les coûts.

Application of outpatient cardiac testing among emergency department patients with syncope.

OBJECTIVES: 2.6% of ED syncope patients will suffer cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs) within 30 days of disposition, and outpatient cardiac testing can improve patient safety. The objective is to determine whether outpatient cardiac testing for ED syncope patients is being appropriately ordered after discharge. To this end, we describe the proportion of high-risk and non-high (low and medium)-risk ED syncope patients as per the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) who have a SAE after ED discharge, and the proportion referred for outpatient cardiac testing. METHODS: Our multicentre prospective cohort study enrolled adult syncope patients between 2010 and 2014 in five academic EDs. We collected patient characteristics, disposition, CSRS predictors, outpatient referrals and testing results (Holter, echocardiography), and 30-day adjudicated SAE (death due to unknown/cardiac cause, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia and structural heart disease). We used descriptive statistics (mean, SD) to report our results. RESULTS: Of 3584 enrolled patients (mean age 50.9 years, 57.7% women), 800 patients (22.3%) received an outpatient referral. Of these 800 patients, 40.3% of the non-high-risk patients (305/756) and 54.5% of the high-risk patients (24/44) received outpatient cardiac testing. Of all patients who received cardiac testing, five (1.5%; 95% CI 0.6% to 3.5%) suffered outpatient SAE (60.0% arrhythmias). Of all patients who did not receive cardiac testing, four patients (0.9%; 95% CI 0.3% to 2.2%) suffered SAE (all arrhythmias). Of the 20 (45.5%) high-risk patients who did not receive testing, two patients (10.0%; 95% CI 2.8% to 30.1%) suffered arrhythmias outside the hospital, while among the 451 (59.7%) non-high-risk patients, only two (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.6%) suffered outpatient arrhythmias. CONCLUSION: Outpatient cardiac testing is largely underused, especially among high-risk ED syncope patients. Better guidelines for outpatient cardiac testing are needed, as the practice is highly variable and mismatched with patient risk.

Reasons for Hospitalization Among Emergency Department Patients With Syncope.

BACKGROUND: Variations in syncope management exist. Our objective was to identify the reasons for consultations and hospitalizations and outcomes among emergency department (ED) syncope patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study to enroll adult syncope patients at five EDs. We collected baseline characteristics, reasons for consultation and hospitalization, and hospital length of stay. Adjudicated 30-day serious adverse events (SAEs) including death, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, structural heart disease, pulmonary embolism, significant hemorrhage, and procedural intervention. We used descriptive analysis. RESULTS: From 4,064 enrolled patients (mean ± SD age = 53.1 ± 23.2 years; 55.9% female), 3,255 (80.1%) were discharged directly by the ED physician. Of those with no SAEs identified in the ED (n = 600), 42.8% of referrals and 46.5% of hospitalizations were for suspected arrhythmias, and 71.2% of patients hospitalized for arrhythmias had no cause identified. SAEs among groups were 9.7% in total, 2.5% discharged by ED physician, 3.4% discharged by consultant, 21.7% as inpatient, and 4.8% following discharge from hospital. The median hospital length of stay for suspected arrhythmias was 5 days (interquartile range = 3 to 8 days). CONCLUSION: Cardiac syncope, particularly suspected arrhythmia, was the major reason for ED referrals and hospitalization. The majority of patients hospitalized for cardiac monitoring had no identified cause. An important number of patients suffered SAEs, particularly arrhythmias, outside the hospital. Development of a risk-stratification tool and out-of-hospital cardiac monitoring strategy should improve patient safety and save substantial resources.