A Participatory Science Approach to Evaluating Factors Associated with the Occurrence of Metals and PFAS in Guatemala City Tap Water.

Limited information is available regarding chemical water quality at the tap in Guatemala City, preventing individuals, water utilities, and public health authorities from making data-driven decisions related to water quality. To address this need, 113 participants among households served by a range of water providers across the Guatemala City metropolitan area were recruited as participatory scientists to collect first-draw and flushed tap water samples at their residence. Samples were transported to the U.S. and analyzed for 20 metals and 25 per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). At least one metal exceeded the Guatemalan Maximum Permissible Limit (MPL) for drinking water in 63% of households (n = 71). Arsenic and lead exceeded the MPL in 33.6% (n = 38) and 8.9% (n = 10) of samples, respectively. Arsenic was strongly associated with groundwater while lead occurrence was not associated with location, water source, or provider. One or more PFAS were detected in 19% of samples (n = 21, range 2.1-64.2 ppt). PFAS were significantly associated with the use of plastic water storage tanks but not with location, water source, or provider. Overall, the high prevalence of arsenic above the MPL in Guatemala City tap water represents a potential health risk that current water treatment processes are not optimized to remove. Furthermore, potential contaminants from premise plumbing and storage, including lead and PFAS, represent additional risks requiring further investigation and public engagement.

Arsenic contamination in rainwater harvesting tanks around Lake Poopó in Oruro, Bolivia: An unrecognized health risk.

Drinking water sources used by largely rural and indigenous communities around Lake Poopó in the Bolivian Altiplano are impacted by drought and a combination of natural and anthropogenic mining-related contaminants putting the long-term health and sustainability of these communities at risk. As an alternative drinking water source, 18 rainwater harvesting tanks connected to corrugated iron roofs, each with a first-flush system, were installed in 5 communities around the lake. The water quality of these tanks was monitored over 22 months and compared to alternative unprotected surface and groundwater sources the communities previously relied upon. The rainwater quality was found to be within the Bolivian and World Health Organization (WHO) limits, except for elevated arsenic concentrations two times the recommended health limit (0.01 mg/L). Tracing arsenic concentrations through the rainwater flow-path showed that the elevated arsenic concentrations result from mineral dust particles entering the system when rainwater interacts with the roof catchment, with arsenic leaching out. A leaching test showed that 24 h of contact time between 200 mL of water and <1 g of roof dust is enough to raise the arsenic levels of the water above the Bolivian and WHO limit. Currently, no other research exists evaluating the quality of harvested rainwater in the Bolivian Altiplano for human consumption or the source of arsenic in harvested water. This represents a significant knowledge gap for future development practitioners and programs addressing water security around Lake Poopó and the wider region. As a result, it is strongly recommended to include arsenic as a standard parameter in water quality monitoring of rainwater harvesting projects, especially in active mining regions, and to optimize strategies to minimize roof dust from entering the collection system.