State-changes in the swimmeret system: a neural circuit that drives locomotion.

The crayfish swimmeret system undergoes transitions between a silent state and an active state. In the silent state, no patterned firing occurs in swimmeret motor neurons. In the active state, bursts of spikes in power stroke motor neurons alternate periodically with bursts of spikes in return stroke motor neurons. In preparations of the isolated crayfish central nervous system (CNS), the temporal structures of motor patterns expressed in the active state are similar to those expressed by the intact animal. These transitions can occur spontaneously, in response to stimulation of command neurons, or in response to application of neuromodulators and transmitter analogues. We used single-electrode voltage clamp of power-stroke exciter and return-stroke exciter motor neurons to study changes in membrane currents during spontaneous transitions and during transitions caused by bath-application of carbachol or octopamine (OA). Spontaneous transitions from silence to activity were marked by the appearance of a standing inward current and periodic outward currents in both types of motor neurons. Bath-application of carbachol also led to the development of these currents and activation of the system. Using low Ca(2+)-high Mg(2+) saline to block synaptic transmission, we found that the carbachol-induced inward current included a direct response by the motor neuron and an indirect component. Spontaneous transitions from activity to silence were marked by disappearance of the standing inward current and the periodic outward currents. Bath-application of OA led promptly to the disappearance of both currents, and silenced the system. OA also acted directly on both types of motor neurons to cause a hyperpolarizing outward current that would contribute to silencing the system.

Limb movements during locomotion: Tests of a model of an intersegmental coordinating circuit.

During normal forward swimming, the swimmerets on neighboring segments of the crayfish abdomen make periodic power-stroke movements that have a characteristic intersegmental difference in phase. Three types of intersegmental interneurons that originate in each abdominal ganglion are necessary and sufficient to maintain this phase relationship. A cellular model of the intersegmental coordinating circuit that also produces the same intersegmental phase has been proposed. In this model, coordinating axons synapse with local interneurons in their target ganglion and form a concatenated circuit that links neighboring segmental ganglia. This model assumed that coordinating axons projected to their nearest-neighboring ganglion but not farther. We tested this assumption in two sets of experiments. If the assumption is correct, then blocking synaptic transmission in an intermediate ganglion should uncouple swimmeret activity on opposite sides of the block. We bathed individual ganglia in a low Ca(2+)-high Mg(2+) saline that effectively silenced both motor output from the ganglion and the coordinating interneurons that originated in it. With this block in place, other ganglia on opposite sides of the block could nonetheless maintain their normal phase difference. Simultaneous recordings of spikes in coordinating axons on opposite sides of the blocked ganglion showed that these axons projected beyond the neighboring ganglion. Selective bilateral ablation of the tracts in which these axons ran showed that they were necessary and usually sufficient to maintain coordination across a blocked ganglion. We discuss revisions of the cellular model of the coordinating circuit that would incorporate these new results.

Local specification of relative strengths of synapses between different abdominal stretch-receptor axons and their common target neurons.

Stretch-receptor (SR) axons form a parallel array of 20 excitatory synapses with target neurons in the crayfish CNS. In each postsynaptic neuron, EPSPs from different SR axons differ significantly in size. These amplitudes are correlated with the segment in which each axon originates and form a segmental gradient of synaptic excitation in individual postsynaptic neurons. These differences might arise postsynaptically because of differential postsynaptic attenuation or presynaptically because of local regulation of the strength of each synapse. To examine these possibilities, we stimulated each SR axon separately and studied integration of its EPSPs in an identified neuron, Flexor Inhibitor 6 (FI6). Transmission from SR axons to FI6 was chemical and direct: EPSPs were accompanied by an increased postsynaptic conductance, were affected by extracellular Ca(2+), and showed frequency-dependent depression. EPSPs from different SR axons summed linearly. The rise times of EPSPs from different SR axons were not significantly different. We also filled individual SR axons and FI6 neurons and mapped and counted their points of contact. Each SR axon contacted each FI6 bilaterally, and contacts of SR axons from different segments were intermingled on FI6. SR axons that made the strongest synapses made more points-of-contact with FI6. These results imply that differences in strength do not arise because of differential postsynaptic attenuation of EPSPs, but rather because certain SR axons predictably make more points of contact with FI6 than do others. Thus, this gradient in excitation requires that each synapse be regulated by an exchange between the SR axon and its target neuron.

Functional organization of crayfish abdominal ganglia. III. Swimmeret motor neurons.

Swimmerets are limbs on several segments of the crayfish abdomen that are used for forward swimming and other behaviors. We present evidence that the functional modules demonstrated previously in physiological experiments are reflected in the morphological disposition of swimmeret motor neurons. The single nerve that innervates each swimmeret divides into two branches that separately contain the axons of power-stroke and return-stroke motor neurons. We used Co(++) or biocytin to backfill the entire pool of neurons that innervated a swimmeret, or functional subsets whose axons occurred in particular branches. Each filled cell body extended a single neurite that projected first to the Lateral Neuropil (LN), and there branched to form dendritic structures and its axon. All the motor neurons that innervated one swimmeret had cell bodies located in the ganglion from which their axons emerged, and the cell bodies of all but two of these neurons were located ipsilateral to their swimmeret. Counts of cell bodies filled from selected peripheral branches revealed about 35 power-stroke motor neurons and 35 return-stroke motor neurons. The cell bodies of these two types were segregated into different clusters within the ganglion, but both types sent their neurites into the ipsilateral LN and had their principle branches in this neuropil. We saw no significant differences in the numbers or distributions of these motor neurons in ganglia A2 through A5. These anatomical features are consistent with the physiological evidence that each swimmeret is controlled by its own neural module, which drives the alternating bursts of impulses in power-stroke and return-stroke motor neurons. We propose that the LN is the site of the synaptic circuit that generates this pattern.

Coordination of limb movements: three types of intersegmental interneurons in the swimmeret system and their responses to changes in excitation.

Coordination of limb movements: three types of intersegmental interneurons in the swimmeret system and their responses to changes in excitation. During forward locomotion, the movements of swimmerets on different segments of the crayfish abdomen are coordinated so that more posterior swimmerets lead their anterior neighbors by approximately 25%. This coordination is accomplished by mechanisms within the abdominal nerve cord. Here we describe three different types of intersegmental swimmeret interneurons that are necessary and sufficient to accomplish this coordination. These interneurons could be identified both by their structures within their home ganglion and by their physiological properties. These interneurons occur as bilateral pairs in each ganglion that innervates swimmerets, and their axons traverse the minuscule tract (MnT) of their home ganglion before leaving to project to neighboring ganglia. Two types, ASCE and ASCL, projected an axon anteriorly; the third type, DSC, projected posteriorly. Each type fires a burst of impulses starting at a different phase of the swimmeret cycle in its home ganglion. In active preparations, excitation of individual ASCE or DSC interneurons at different phases in the cycle affected the timing of the next cycle in the interneuron's target ganglion. The axons of these interneurons that projected between two ganglia ran close together, and their firing often could be recorded by the same electrode. Experiments in which either this tract or the rest of the intersegmental connectives was cut bilaterally showed that these interneurons were both necessary and sufficient for coordination of neighboring swimmerets. When the level of excitation of the swimmeret system was increased by bath application of carbachol, the period of the system's cycle shortened, but the characteristic phase difference within and between ganglia was preserved. Each of these interneurons responded to this increase in excitation by increasing the frequency of impulses within each burst, but the phases and relative durations of their bursts did not change, and their activity remained coordinated with the cycle in their home ganglion. The decrease in duration of each burst was matched to the increase in impulse frequency within the burst so that the mean numbers of impulses per burst did not change significantly despite a threefold change in period. These three types of interneurons appear to form a concatenated intersegmental coordinating circuit that imposes a particular intersegmental phase on the local pattern generating modules innervating each swimmeret. This circuit is asymmetric, and forces posterior segments to lead each cycle of output.

Intersegmental coordination of limb movements during locomotion: mathematical models predict circuits that drive swimmeret beating.

Normal locomotion in arthropods and vertebrates is a complex behavior, and the neural mechanisms that coordinate their limbs during locomotion at different speeds are unknown. The neural modules that drive cyclic movements of swimmerets respond to changes in excitation by changing the period of the motor pattern. As period changes, however, both intersegmental phase differences and the relative durations of bursts of impulses in different sets of motor neurons are preserved. To investigate these phenomena, we constructed a cellular model of the local pattern-generating circuit that drives each swimmeret. We then constructed alternative intersegmental circuits that might coordinate these local circuits. The structures of both the model of the local circuit and the alternative models of the coordinating circuit were based on and constrained by previous experimental results on pattern-generating neurons and coordinating interneurons. To evaluate the relative merits of these alternatives, we compared their dynamics with the performance of the real circuit when the level of excitation was changed. Many of the alternative coordinating circuits failed. One coordinating circuit, however, did effectively match the performance of the real system as period changed from 1 to 3.2 Hz. With this coordinating circuit, both the intersegmental phase differences and the relative durations of activity within each of the local modules fell within the ranges characteristic of the normal motor pattern and did not change significantly as period changed. These results predict a mechanism of coordination and a pattern of intersegmental connections in the CNS that is amenable to experimental test.

Intersegmental coordination of swimmeret movements: mathematical models and neural circuits.

Swimmerets move periodically through a cycle of power-strokes and return-strokes. Swimmerets on neighboring segments differ in phase by approximately 25%, and maintain this difference even when the period of the cycle changes from < 1 to > 4 Hz. We constructed a minimal cellular model of the segmental pattern-generating circuit which incorporated its essential components, and whose dynamics were like those of the local circuit. Three different intersegmental coordinating units were known to link neighboring ganglia, but their targets are unknown. We constructed different intersegmental circuits which these units might form between neighboring cellular models, and compared their dynamics with the real system. One intersegmental circuit could maintain an approximately 25% phase difference through a range of periods. In physiological experiments, we identified three types of intersegmental interneurons that originate in each ganglion and project to its neighbors. These neurons fire bursts at certain parts of the swimmeret cycle in their home ganglion. These three neurons are necessary and sufficient to maintain normal coordination between neighboring segments. Their properties conform to the predictions of the cellular model.

Intersegmental coordination in invertebrates and vertebrates.

How does the CNS coordinate muscle contractions between different body segments during normal locomotion? Work on several preparations has shown that this coordination relies on excitability gradients and on differences between ascending and descending intersegmental coupling. Abstract models involving chains of coupled oscillators have defined properties of coordinating circuits that would permit them to establish a constant intersegmental phase in the face of changing periods. Analyses that combine computational and experimental strategies have led to new insights into the cellular organization of intersegmental coordinating circuits and the neural control of swimming in lamprey, tadpole, crayfish and leech.

Modulation of force during locomotion: differential action of crustacean cardioactive peptide on power-stroke and return- stroke motor neurons.

Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) elicited expression of the motor pattern that drives coordinated swimmeret beating in crayfish and modulated this pattern in a dose-dependent manner. In each ganglion that innervates swimmerets, neurons with CCAP-like immunoreactivity sent processes to the lateral neuropils, which contain branches of swimmeret motor neurons and the local pattern-generating circuits. CCAP affected each of the four functional groups of motor neurons, power-stroke excitors (PSE), return-stroke excitors (RSE), power-stroke inhibitors (PSI), and return-stroke inhibitors (RSI), that innervate each swimmeret. When CCAP was superfused, the membrane potentials of these neurons began to oscillate periodically about their mean potentials. The mean potentials of PSE and RSI neurons depolarized, and some of these neurons began to fire during each depolarization. Both intensity and durations of PSE bursts increased significantly. The mean potentials of RSE and PSI neurons hyperpolarized, and these neurons were less likely to fire during each depolarization. When CCAP was superfused in a low Ca2+ saline that blocked chemical transmission, these changes in mean potential persisted, but the periodic oscillations disappeared. These results are evidence that CCAP acts at two levels: activation of local premotor circuits and direct modulation of swimmeret motor neurons. The action on motor neurons is differential; PSEs and RSIs are excited, but RSEs and PSIs are inhibited. The consequences of this selectivity are to increase intensity of bursts of impulses that excite power-stroke muscles.

Passive properties of swimmeret motor neurons.

Four different functional types of motor neurons innervate each swimmeret: return-stroke excitors (RSEs), power-stroke excitors (PSEs), return-stroke inhibitors (RSIs), and power-stroke inhibitors (PSIs). We studied the structures and passive electrical properties of these neurons, and tested the hypothesis that different types of motor neurons would have different passive properties that influenced generation of the swimmeret motor pattern. Cell bodies of neurons innervating one swimmeret were clustered in two anatomic groups in the same ganglion. The shapes of motor neurons in both groups were similar, despite the differences in locations of their cell bodies and in their functions. Diameters of their axons in the swimmeret nerve ranged from <2 to approximately 35 microm. Resting membrane potentials, input resistances, and membrane time constants were recorded with microelectrodes in the processes of swimmeret motor neurons in isolated abdominal nerve cord preparations. Membrane potentials had a median of -59 mV, with 25th and 75th percentiles of -66.0 and -53 mV. The median input resistance was 6.4 M omega, with 25th and 75th percentiles of 3.4 and 13.7 M omega. Membrane time constants had a median of 9.3 ms, with 25th and 75th percentiles of 5.7 and 15.0 ms. Excitatory and inhibitory motor neurons had similar passive properties. RSE motor neurons were typically more depolarized than the other types, but the passive properties of RSE, PSE, RSI, and PSI neurons were not significantly different. Membrane time constants measured from cell bodies were briefer than those measured from neuropil processes, but membrane potentials and input resistances were not significantly different. The relative sizes of different motor neurons were measured from the sizes of their impulses recorded extracellularly from the swimmeret nerve. Smaller motor neurons had lower membrane potentials and were more likely to be active in the motor pattern than were large motor neurons. Motor neurons of different sizes had similar input resistances and membrane time constants. Motor neurons that were either oscillating or oscillating and firing in phase with the swimmeret motor pattern had lower average membrane potentials and longer time constants than those that were not oscillating. When the state of the swimmeret system changed from quiescence to continuous production of the motor pattern, the resting potentials, input resistances, and membrane time constants of individual swimmeret motor neurons changed only slightly. On average, both input resistance and membrane time constant increased. These similarities are considered in light of the functional task each motor neuron performs, and a hypothesis is developed that links the brief time constants of these neurons and graded synaptic transmission by premotor interneurons to control of the swimmeret muscles and the performance of the swimmeret system.

How does the crayfish swimmeret system work? Insights from nearest-neighbor coupled oscillator models.

Rhythmic movements of crayfish swimmerets are coordinated by a neural circuit that links their four abdominal ganglia. Each swimmeret is driven by its own small local circuit, or pattern-generating module. We modeled this network as a chain of four oscillators, bidirectionally coupled to their nearest neighbors, and tested the model's ability to reproduce experimentally observed changes in intersegmental phases and in period caused by differential excitation of selected abdominal ganglia. The choices needed to match the experimental data lead to the following predictions: coupling between ganglia is asymmetric; the ascending and descending coupling have approximately equal strengths; intersegmental coupling does not significantly affect the frequency of the system; and excitation affects the intrinsic frequencies of the oscillators and might also change properties of intersegmental coupling.

A test of the excitability-gradient hypothesis in the swimmeret system of crayfish.

The motor pattern that drives coordinated movements of swimmerets in different segments during forward swimming characteristically begins with a power-stroke by the most posterior limbs, followed progressively by power-strokes of each of the more anterior limbs. To explain this caudal-to-rostral progression, the hypothesis was proposed that the neurons that drive the most posterior swimmerets are more excitable than their more anterior counterparts, and so reach threshold first. To test this excitability-gradient hypothesis, I used carbachol to excite expression of the swimmeret motor pattern and used tetrodotoxin (TTX), sucrose solutions, and cutting to block the flow of information between anterior and posterior segments. I showed that the swimmeret activity elicited by carbachol is like that produced when the swimmeret system is spontaneously active and that blocking an intersegmental connective uncoupled swimmeret activity on opposite sides of the block. When anterior and posterior segments were isolated from each other, the frequencies of the motor patterns expressed by anterior segments were not slower than those expressed by posterior segments exposed to the same concentrations of carbachol. This result was independent of the concentration of carbachol applied and of the number of segmental ganglia that remained connected. When TTX was used to block information flow, the motor patterns produced in segments anterior to the block were significantly faster than those from segments posterior to the block. These observations contradict the predictions of the excitability-gradient hypothesis and lead to the conclusion that the hypothesis is incorrect.

Tests of the motor neuron model of the local pattern-generating circuits in the swimmeret system.

The motor pattern that drives each crayfish swimmeret consists of alternating bursts of impulses in power-stroke (PS) and return-stroke (RS) motor neurons. A model of the neural circuit that generates this pattern focused on connections between motor neurons themselves (Heitler, 1978, 1981). The model predicts that synergist motor neurons are electrically coupled, whereas antagonists make mostly inhibitory synapses. We tested this model by observing the responses of motor neurons to pressure ejection of GABA and glutamate, transmitters that crayfish motor neurons release at neuromuscular junctions, and by measuring the strengths and delays of synapses between pairs of motor neurons. Both GABA and glutamate inhibited motor neurons. This inhibition persisted when synaptic transmitter release was blocked by high Mg2+. The effects of GABA were mimicked by muscimol, but not by baclofen or the GABAc receptor agonist cis-4-aminocrotonic acid, and they were not blocked by bicuculline. The effects of glutamate were mimicked by ibotenic acid. Picrotoxin partially blocked glutamate's inhibition of the motor pattern, but did not affect GABA responses. Most (87%) pairs of synergist motor neurons tested made weak, noninverting connections. Approximately half of these had synaptic delays of <2 msec, consistent with direct electrical or chemical synapses. Individual motor neurons were dye-coupled to between one and three other motor neurons, and to interneurons. Less than half (44%) of the pairs of antagonist motor neurons tested made synaptic connections. These connections were weak, had long latencies (>4 msec), and therefore were probably polysynaptic. We conclude that direct synapses between swimmeret motor neurons cannot account for alternation of PS and RS bursts.

Coordination in the crayfish swimmeret system: differential excitation causes changes in intersegmental phase.

1. Gradients of excitation in the swimmeret system were created by applying either pilocarpine or carbachol to selected ganglia in isolated abdominal nerve cords. The state of the system was monitored in each segment with extracellular electrodes on nerves that innervated swimmerets. In preparations that were quiescent before drugs were applied, these cholinergic agonists elicited well-coordinated swimmeret motor patterns from the entire system, including ganglia that were not directly treated with pilocarpine or carbachol. 2. The periods of these patterns depended on the number of ganglia that were directly excited. As this number increased, period decreased. When the same numbers of ganglia were excited by direct application of a drug, the mean period of the swimmeret activity elicited by pilocarpine was greater than that elicited by carbachol. 3. Selective excitation of anterior or posterior ganglia caused significant changes in intersegmental phase at the boundary between excited and nonexcited regions of the nerve cord. When only anterior ganglia were excited directly, the phases of their power-stroke activity relative to the most posterior ganglion were advanced. When only posterior ganglia were excited directly, the phases of power-stroke activity in more anterior ganglia were retarded. Neither pilocarpine nor carbachol caused a complete reversal of the normal phase relations of the swimmeret motor patterns. 4. These results are consistent with an asymmetric-coupling model of the intersegmental coordinating circuit of the swimmeret system but contradict an alternative excitability-gradient model.

Acetylcholinesterase activity in neurons of crayfish abdominal ganglia.

Acetylcholine is known to be a neurotransmitter in crustacean central nervous systems, but the numbers and distribution of cholinergic neurons in the segmental ganglia have not been described. To begin a census of cholinergic neurons in these ganglia, we used a histochemical assay for acetylcholinesterase to map neurons that contained this enzyme in the six abdominal ganglia of crayfish. In each abdominal ganglion, about 47 cell bodies were stained. The distributions of these stained cells in individual ganglia were similar, and the numbers were not significantly different. None of these stained cell bodies could be identified from their structures or locations as previously identified motor neurons or sensory neurons with central cell bodies. The process of one unpaired midline neuron that occurred only in the first three abdominal ganglia divided to send a pair of axons anteriorly into both halves of the connective. The central projections of afferent axons from many peripheral sensory neurons stained clearly as they entered each ganglion. Terminals of these axons were heavily stained in the horseshoe neuropil and the lateral neuropils. We labeled both gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and acetylcholinesterase in individual ganglia. Only a few neurons in each ganglion were double-labeled. The unpaired midline neurons in the three anterior ganglia that stained for acetylcholinesterase did not show GABA-like immunoreactivity, but cells with similar shapes did label with the GABA antiserum. Acetylcholinesterase is not a definitive marker of cholinergic neurons, but its presence is often associated with the cholinergic phenotype. These stained cells should be considered as putative cholinergic neurons.

State-dependent responses of two motor systems in the crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus.

The expression of both swimmeret and postural motor patterns in crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) were affected by stimulation of a second root of a thoracic ganglion. The response of the swimmeret system depended on the state of the postural system. In most cases, the response of the swimmeret system outlasted the stimulus. Stimulation of a thoracic second root also elicited coordinated responses from the postural system, that outlasted the stimulus. In different preparations, either the flexor excitor motor neurones or the extensor excitor motor neurones were excited by this stimulation. In every case, excitation of one set of motor neurones was accompanied by inhibition of that group's functional antagonists. This stimulation seemed to coordinate the activity of both systems; when stimulation inhibited the flexor motor neurones, then the extensor motor neurones and the swimmeret system were excited. When stimulation excited the flexor motor neurones, then the extensor motor neurones and the swimmeret system were inhibited. Two classes of interneurones that responded to stimulation of a thoracic second root were encountered in the first abdominal ganglion. These interneurones could be the pathway that coordinates the response of the postural and swimmeret systems to stimulation of a thoracic second root.

Proctolin and excitation of the crayfish swimmeret system.

The ventral nerve cord of crayfish contains axons of five pairs of excitatory interneurons, each of which can activate the swimmeret system. Perfusion of the ventral nerve cord with the neuropeptide proctolin also activates the swimmeret system. The experiments reported here were conducted to test the hypothesis that one or more of these excitatory interneurons uses proctolin as a transmitter. Each of the five excitatory axons was located and stimulated separately in an individual crayfish, and similar motor activity was elicited by stimulating each of them. Quantitative comparison of spontaneous swimmeret motor patterns with activity caused by stimulating one of these excitatory axons, EC, or by perfusing with proctolin solutions showed that the motor patterns produced under these three conditions were not significantly different (P > 0.05). By using a new, affinity-purified proctolin antiserum, we labeled axons in the connective tissue between the last thoracic and first abdominal ganglion and compared the positions of labeled axons with the previously described positions of the excitatory axons. About 0.3% of the axons in these connective tissues showed proctolin-like immunoreactivity, but heavily labeled pairs of axons did occur bilaterally in the regions of excitatory swimmeret axons. The projections of these labeled axons into the abdominal ganglia were traced in serial plastic sections. Labeled processes were abundant in the lateral neuropils, the loci of the swimmeret pattern-generating circuitry. From this evidence, we propose that three of these excitatory swimmeret interneurons use proctolin as a transmitter, but that a fourth does not. The evidence for the fifth axon is ambiguous.

A separate local pattern-generating circuit controls the movements of each swimmeret in crayfish.

1. Within an abdominal segment, the motor output from the segmental ganglion to the swimmerets consists of coordinated bursts of impulses in the separate pools of motor neurons innervating the left and right limbs. This coordinated motor pattern features alternating (out-of-phase) bursts of impulses in the power-stroke (PS) and return-stroke (RS) motor axons that innervate each swimmeret. PS bursts on both sides of each segment occur simultaneously (in-phase), and so RS bursts on both sides are also in-phase. 2. With all intersegmental connections interrupted, isolated abdominal ganglia were able to sustain the normal swimmeret motor pattern of alternating PS/RS activity that was bilaterally in-phase. 3. After an isolated ganglion was surgically bisected down the midline, the isolated hemiganglia that resulted could produce stable, coordinated alternation of PS and RS bursts. 4. The neuropeptide proctolin could induce rhythmic oscillations of membrane potential in swimmeret neurons when spiking was blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX). For neurons within the same hemiganglion, these oscillations retained the same phase relations they displayed in controls, but the oscillations of neurons in different hemiganglia became uncoordinated. 5. Synaptic transmission between swimmeret neurons in the same hemiganglion persisted in the presence of TTX. Swimmeret interneurons that could activate the pattern-generating circuitry under control conditions could induce membrane-potential oscillations in swimmeret neurons of the same hemiganglion when TTX was present. 6. We conclude that a separate hemisegmental pattern-generating circuit controls the rhythmic PS and RS movements of each swimmeret. Each circuit is located in the same hemiganglion as the population of motor neurons that innervates the local swimmeret. Graded transmission is sufficient to coordinate the timing of oscillatory activity within the hemisegmental circuitry. These hemisegmental circuits are coupled by intersegmental and bilateral coordinating pathways that are dependent on sodium action potentials for their operation.

Cholinergic modulation of the swimmeret motor system in crayfish.

1. The muscarinic agonist pilocarpine induced the swimmeret motor pattern in resting isolated preparations of the crayfish abdominal nerve cord and modulated the burst frequency in a dose-dependent manner. 2. Nicotine did not elicit rhythmic activity in resting isolated preparations but increased the burst frequency in active preparations. Nicotine produced higher burst frequencies than pilocarpine. 3. The acetylcholine (ACh) analogue carbachol combined the effects of pilocarpine and nicotine. It activated isolated resting preparations and increased the burst frequency as effectively as nicotine. The ACh-esterase inhibitor eserine also increased the burst frequency in active preparations. 4. Neither muscarinic nor nicotinic antagonists disrupted the proctolin-induced motor pattern, suggesting that proctolin and cholinergic agonists affect two different pathways for the activation of the swimmeret system. 5. We conclude that cholinergic interneurons participate in initiation of the swimmeret motor pattern and can modulate its burst frequency.

Neurons with histaminelike immunoreactivity in the segmental and stomatogastric nervous systems of the crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus and the lobster Homarus americanus.

We used a polyclonal antiserum against histamine to map histaminelike immunoreactivity (HLI) in whole mounts of the segmental ganglia and stomatogastric ganglion of crayfish and lobster. Carbodiimide fixation permitted both HRP-conjugated and FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies to be used effectively to visualize HLI in these whole mounts. Two interneurons that send axons through the inferior ventricular nerve (ivn) and the stomatogastric nerve to the stomatogastric ganglion had strong HLI, both in crayfish and in lobster. These ivn interneurons were known from other evidence to be histaminergic. The neuropil of the stomatogastric ganglion in both crayfish and lobster contained brightly labeled terminals of axons that entered the ganglion from the stomatogastric nerve. No neuronal cell bodies in this ganglion had HLI. Each segmental ganglion contained at least one pair of neurons with HLI. Some neurons in the subesophageal ganglion and in each thoracic ganglion labeled very brightly. Axons of projection interneurons with strong HLI occurred in the dorsal lateral tracts of each segmental ganglion, and sent branches to the lateral neurophils and tract neurophils of each ganglion. All the labeled neurons were interneurons; no HLI was observed in peripheral nerves.