Effects of stress management on pain behavior in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of stress management training on pain behavior exhibited by persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and the relationship of change in pain behavior with certain patient characteristics as well as change in self-reported levels of pain. METHODS: Patients with RA (n = 131) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a stress management group, an attention control group, or a standard care control group. The stress management and attention control groups received a 10-week intervention followed by a 15-month maintenance phase. RESULTS: The 3 groups did not differ significantly in the change in pain behavior at any of the assessment periods. However, persons with RA who had less disease activity tended to exhibit positive changes in pain behavior over time. Changes in self-reported pain were not significantly related to changes in pain behavior. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that stress management interventions do not reduce total pain behaviors exhibited by persons with RA. Changes in pain behaviors appear to be related to disease activity, age, and disease duration, but not to changes in self-reported measures of pain.

Implications of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: do subtypes really matter?

OBJECTIVE: To examine depressive disorders and health status in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), controlling for potential confounds. METHOD: Subjects (n = 426) completed measures of depressive symptoms (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]) and health status (Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 [AIMS2]), via cross-sectional survey. Subjects (n = 299) with few depressive symptoms (CES-D < or = 10) were not evaluated further. Subjects with CES-D > or = 11 were interviewed using the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD; n = 46), dysthymic disorder (DD; n = 21), or minor depressive disorder (MND; n = 18). RESULTS: Regression analyses examined differences between the depressive disorders on AIMS2 subscales. Health status scores were similar between the depressive disorder subcategories; significant differences were found between MDD and MND on AIMS2 Physical scores and MDD and DD on AIMS2 Symptom scores. CONCLUSION: Regarding health status, presence of depression itself seems to overshadow differences between depression subtypes; antidepressant treatments/referrals for persons with concomitant RA and any depressive disorder subtype appear warranted.

Stress management in rheumatoid arthritis: what is the underlying mechanism?

OBJECTIVE: To test whether change in cognitive-behavioral variables (such as self-efficacy, coping strategies, and helplessness) is a mediator in the relation between cognitive behavior therapy and reduced pain and depression in persons with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A sample of patients with RA who completed a stress management training program (n = 47) was compared to a standard care control group (n = 45). A path analysis testing a model including direct effects of comprehensive stress management training on pain and depression and indirect effects via change in cognitive-behavioral variables was conducted. RESULTS: The path coefficients for the indirect effects of stress management training on pain and depression via change in cognitive-behavioral variables were statistically significant, whereas the path coefficients for the direct effects were found not to be statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Decreases in pain and depression following stress management training are due to beneficial changes in the arenas of self-efficacy (the belief that one can perform a specific behavior or task in the future), coping strategies (an individual's confidence in his or her ability to manage pain), and helplessness (perceptions of control regarding arthritis). There is little evidence of additional direct effects of stress management training on pain and depression.

A confirmatory factor analysis of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in rheumatoid arthritis patients: additional evidence for a four-factor model.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), testing all of the alternative models suggested by the previous evidence. METHODS: The CES-D was administered to a group of RA patients (n = 685) during a structured telephone interview. The telephone interview was repeated 6 months later (n = 537) and 12 months later (n = 453). Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test alternative models. RESULTS: The correlated 4-factor model and the second-order 4-factor model were the best fitting models. CONCLUSION: The factor structure of the CES-D previously found in the general population was replicated in an RA sample. The results are consistent with previous evidence of criterion contamination in the CES-D when used in an RA sample and provide support for the view that a single summary score may not be the most informative index of the CES-D.