RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the most prevalent geographically-specific head and neck cancer. Its incidence was high in the Asian population, especially in certain parts such as Southern China and South East Asia. Most patients with NPC are presented with intermediate-stage or locally advanced disease requiring chemoradiation as the primary treatment of choice. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) was found overexpressed in most patients with NPC associated with poor prognosis making its inhibitor one of the most plausible treatment options in addition to chemoradiation. In EGFR-positive NPC patients, nimotuzumab, a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody will bind the extracellular domain of EGFR leading to tumor growth suppressions. This study's objective was to assess the real-world clinical efficacy of nimotuzumab for patients with intermediate-stage and locally advanced NPC when in combination with concurrent chemoradiation. METHODS: This retrospective real-world study examined a sample of intermediate-stage and locally advanced NPC patients who were treated with or without adding nimotuzumab to concurrent chemoradiation at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital in Indonesia from January 2009 to December 2017. The outcomes were patients' real-world five-year overall survival (rwOS) and progression-free survival (rwPFS) compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, gender, comorbidities, clinical staging, staging based on Tumor status (T), staging based on Nodes status (N), and types of radiotherapy. Results: A total of 407 patients were included in the analysis, 61 patients receiving concurrent nimotuzumab and chemoradiation and 346 patients receiving chemoradiation alone. Patients receiving concurrent nimotuzumab and chemoradiation tended to have less aggressive NPC than patients receiving chemoradiation alone. Multivariate-adjusted Cox models revealed that combining nimotuzumab with chemoradiation was associated with a statistically significant longer rwOS gain (hazard ratio (HR)=0.46 (95% CI: 0.26-0.82, p=0.008)) and a trend of longer rwPFS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.67 (95% CI: 0.41-1.09, p=0.109)) in comparison to chemoradiation alone. Conclusion: In this retrospective real-world study, concurrent nimotuzumab and chemoradiation usage was associated with a significant overall survival benefit than chemoradiation alone for intermediate-stage and locally advanced NPC patients. Hence, adding nimotuzumab to patients' chemoradiation should be considered in patients with intermediate-stage and locally advanced NPC.
RESUMO
Introduction: The incidence of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) is high, with new cases accounting for 5.2% of all malignancies in Indonesia. Most cases are detected at an advanced stage, and recurrences are common. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and osteopontin (OPN) are important markers in tumorigenesis that serve as prognostic predictors. This study aims to determine the correlation of VEGF and OPN expression with 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 155 patients with locally advanced NPC. Data were obtained from medical records between 2015 and 2017. The locally advanced sample of this disease that met the inclusion criteria was stained with H&E before being prepared in a paraffin block. Furthermore, the immunohistochemistry staining results for VEGF and OPN were observed with ImageJ 1.50i and calculated semi-quantitatively using the histoscore. Results: The 3-year PFS obtained was 39%, with a median of 23 months. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression was detected in 113 of 155 samples (72.9%), while positive OPN expression was discovered in 99 of 155 samples (63.8%). There was a correlation between VEGF (p = 0.747) and OPN expression (p = 0.584) and 3-year PFS. Positive VEGF and OPN expression in the subgroup of patients with stage IVB and N3 tumors was related to improved 3-year PFS (p < 0.05). This was similar to the positive VEGF expression in the subgroup of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Vascular endothelial growth factor and OPN remained potential prognostic predictors in NPC. Patients with positive VEGF and OPN expression in N3, IVB, and neoadjuvant treatment had significantly improved 3-year PFS.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Most new nasopharyngeal cancer cases occur in low-income and middle-income countries, and these patients experience poorer overall survival than that of new nasopharyngeal cancer cases in high-income countries. The goal of this research project is to determine whether the introduction of a radiation therapy quality assurance program can ultimately improve outcomes for nasopharyngeal cancer patients in lower-income and middle-income countries. This study reports the results of the first phase of the International Atomic Energy Agency Coordinated Research Project (325-E3-TM-47712). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This prospective study has 2 phases. Phase 1 is a survey of radiation therapy resources, patient characteristics and treatment, and results of radiation therapy quality assurance performed by the expert panel. An educational workshop reviewing phase 1 results for each center was completed before accrual of patients for phase 2. The ultimate aim of the study is to compare the first and second cohort of patients to see if quality assurance can result in fewer major protocol deviations and a 15% improvement in patients' 3-year progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of 14 participating centers, 13 (93%) had computed tomography simulators and linear accelerators (LINAC) with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) capacity, median 3 LINAC (range, 1-13), and median 10 radiation oncologists (range, 5-51). The annual number of nasopharyngeal cancer cases irradiated was median 54 (range, 10-627). Five of 14 centers (36%) had no local radiation therapy quality assurance. For the current phase 1 study, 134 patients were evaluated, 82.1% had MRI staging, 99.3% had metastatic workup, 65.6% undifferentiated histology, 51% stage 3 and 49% stage 4. Radiation therapy quality assurance revealed 81 (60.4%) of 134 patients had major protocol violations in gross tumor volume and high dose planning target volume contours and/or dosimetry, 28.4% patients had borderline plans, 15 (11.2%) acceptable, and only 6 (4.2%) had inevitable compromise due to tumor extent. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first International Atomic Energy Agency study to address the fundamental issue of treatment quality rather than altered treatment regimens. The high rate of unacceptable radiation therapy plans is a major concern, and we hope phase 2 will show a significant reduction and improved patient outcomes.
