Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 109(1): 55-61, 1998 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9426518

RESUMO

We prospectively evaluated 639 sequential clinical isolates of alpha-hemolytic gram-positive cocci as possible Streptococcus pneumoniae. On the basis of results of tests for optochin susceptibility, tube bile solubility, and the quellung reaction, 74 strains (11.6%) were categorized as unequivocal pneumococci (optochin positive, tube bile solubility positive, quellung reaction positive). Among 450 optochin- and tube bile solubility-negative organisms, a subset of 56 strains was tested for quellung reaction (all negative); these isolates were categorized as unequivocal nonpneumococci. A final 115 organisms with an inconsistent or discordant combination of susceptibility to optochin, tube bile solubility, and quellung reaction were categorized as equivocal strains. With the unequivocal isolates, a commercial molecular probe for S pneumoniae (AccuProbe; Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif) showed 100% sensitivity (74/74) and 100% specificity (56/56). Among the 115 equivocal strains, however, 33 (28.7%) reacted with the AccuProbe, whereas only 3 (2.6%) showed a capsule that reacted in the quellung test. A subset of the equivocal strains identified in this group of primarily respiratory isolates may have been S pneumoniae that only partially expressed their classic phenotype of optochin susceptibility and bile solubility and only rarely expressed capsular antigens. A practical, cost-sparing algorithm is proposed to facilitate the routine clinical identification of S pneumoniae.


Assuntos
Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Exsudatos e Transudatos/microbiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolamento & purificação , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/economia , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Ácido Desoxicólico/farmacologia , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Quinina/análogos & derivados , Quinina/farmacologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genética
2.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 103(1): 52-6, 1995 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7817945

RESUMO

Parallel testing for culture recovery of Clostridium difficile was performed using three selective media in each of four anaerobic incubation environmental systems. Testing was completed on 67 stool samples from 60 hospitalized patients in whom C difficile-associated diarrhea was suspected. Three different media were evaluated: CCFA (modified cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar), CCFA-PRAS (CCFA, prereduced-anaerobically-sterilized) and CMBA (modified cycloserine-mannitol-blood agar). The incubation systems compared were an anaerobic chamber (Model 800 Anaerobic Environmental System, Anaerobe Systems, San Jose, CA), the anaerobic jar (BBL, Cockeysville, MD), the anaerobic Bio-Bag (BBL), and the anaerobic pouch (BBL). C difficile was found in 16 samples collected from 15 patients. Comparing recovery on the various types of media in all four anaerobic atmospheres, C difficile was recovered on all (64) CCFA plates, 56 of 64 CCFA-PRAS plates, and 43 of 64 CMBA plates (P < .03 comparing CCFA and CMBA). Of the 48 plates in each incubation system that were inoculated with specimens positive for C difficile, the organism was recovered from 43 plates in the anaerobe chamber, 41 incubated in an anaerobe jar, 40 in the Bio-Bag, and 39 incubated in the GasPak pouch, all providing similar recovery of C difficile (P = .08). The CCFA-PRAS and CMBA media demonstrated less inhibition of normal stool flora compared to the CCFA. Overall CCFA that was anaerobically reduced at least 4 hours before use, and contained the original concentration of antimicrobial agents described by George and colleagues, was superior to CMBA for recovery of C. difficile.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/métodos , Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Meios de Cultura/classificação , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos
3.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 96(3): 364-7, 1991 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1877533

RESUMO

Twenty-five isolates, including six strains of Shigella species, six strains of Salmonella species, five strains of Yersinia enterocolitica, six strains of Campylobacter jejuni, and two strains of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, were inoculated at a concentration of 1.5 x 10(4) colony-forming units/mL into the following transport systems: Fekal Enteric Plus (Trend Scientific, Inc., St. Paul, MN), Cary Blair Transport Medium (Remel, Inc., Lenexa, KS), and Para-Pak C & S (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, OH). The Fekal Enteric Plus system showed a greater than or equal to 50% recovery of the original bacterial inoculum after 96 hours for all Salmonella, Shigella, and Yersinia strains tested and after as long as 72 hours for Vibrio strains. The Cary Blair Transport System showed greater than or equal to 50% recovery of the initial inoculum at 96 hours for five of six Salmonella strains, four of six Shigella strains, all Yersinia strains, and one of two Vibrio strains. With the use of the Para-Pak C & S, greater than or equal to 50% recovery of the original inoculum after 96 h was demonstrated for five of six Salmonella strains, four of six Shigella strains, all Yersinia strains, and one of two Vibrio strains. All three systems did not demonstrate even 10% recovery of the initial C. jejuni inoculum at 24 hours when held at room temperature.


Assuntos
Fezes/microbiologia , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Campylobacter/isolamento & purificação , Meios de Cultura , Humanos , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Salmonella/isolamento & purificação , Shigella/isolamento & purificação , Manejo de Espécimes , Temperatura , Vibrio/isolamento & purificação , Yersinia/isolamento & purificação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...