RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The antibody-drug conjugate sacituzumab govitecan is approved for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer and has shown promising results in various other types of cancer. Its costs may limit patient access to this novel effective treatment modality. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop an evidence-based rational dosing regimen that results in targeted drug exposure within the therapeutic range while minimizing financial toxicity, to improve treatment access. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Exposure equivalent dosing strategies were developed based on pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation by using the published pharmacokinetic model developed by the license holder. The alternative dose was based on the principle of using complete vials to prevent spillage and on the established non-linear relationship between body weight and systemic exposure. Equivalent exposure compared to the approved dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg was aimed for. Equivalent exposure was conservatively defined as calculated geometric mean ratios within the 0.9-1.11 boundaries for area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), trough concentration (Ctrough) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of the alternative dosing regimen compared to the approved dosing regimen. Since different vial sizes are available for the European Union (EU) and United States (US) market, because body weight distributions differ between these populations, we performed our analysis for both scenarios. RESULTS: Dosing regimens of sacituzumab govitecan for the EU (< 50 kg: 400 mg, 50-80 kg: 600 mg, and > 80 kg: 800 mg) and US population (< 40 kg: 360 mg, 40-65 kg: 540 mg, 65-90 kg: 720 mg, and > 90 kg: 900 mg) were developed, based on weight bands. The geometric mean ratios for all pharmacokinetic outcomes were within the predefined equivalence boundaries, while the quantity of drug used was 21.5% and 19.0% lower for the EU and US scenarios, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With the alternative dosing proposal, an approximately 20% reduction in drug expenses for sacituzumab govitecan can be realized while maintaining an equivalent and more evenly distributed exposure throughout the body weight range, without notable increases in pharmacokinetic variability.
RESUMO
Kinase inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment in the past 25 years and currently form the cornerstone of many treatments. Due to the increasing evidence for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of kinase inhibitors, the need is growing for new assays to rapidly evaluate kinase inhibitor plasma concentrations. In this study, we developed an LC-MS/MS assay for the rapid and simultaneous quantification of 21 kinase inhibitors. First, a literature search was conducted to ensure that the linear ranges of the analytes were in line with the reported therapeutic windows and/or TDM reference values. Subsequently, the assay was validated according to FDA and EMA guidelines for linearity, selectivity, carry-over, accuracy, precision, dilution integrity, matrix effect, recovery, and stability. The assay was fast, with a short run-time of 2 min per sample. Sample pre-treatment consisted of protein precipitation with methanol enriched with stable isotope-labeled internal standards (SIL-IS), and the mixture was vortexed and centrifuged before sample injection. Separation was achieved using a C18 column (3 µm,50 × 2.1 mm) with a gradient of two mobile phases (ammonium formate buffer pH 3.5 and acetonitrile). Analyte detection was conducted in positive ionization mode using selected reaction monitoring. The assay was accurate and precise in plasma as well as in serum. Extraction recovery ranged between 95.0% and 106.0%, and the matrix effect was 95.7%-105.2%. The stability of the analytes varied at room temperature and in refrigerated conditions. However, all drugs were found to be stable for 7 days in the autosampler. The clinical applicability of the analytical method (486 analyzed samples between 1 July 2022-1 July 2023) as well as external quality control testing results were evaluated. Taken together, the results demonstrate that the analytical method was validated and applicable for routine analyses in clinical practice.
