Utility of Radiologic Variables to Predict the Result of Lumbar Infusion Test in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus is based in clinical data, radiologic variables, and invasive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing, such as the lumbar infusion test. Several neuroimaging findings are inconclusively related to improvement after CSF shunt surgery. CSF tests are invasive and have complications. The aim of this study was to select radiologic variables related to a positive lumbar infusion test so as to avoid this test in patients. METHODS: Patients with possible idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus were reviewed. The collected radiologic data were cingulate sulcus sign, disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space, callosal angle, and width of temporal horns. Two groups were established: group 1, comprising patients with resistance to CSF outflow <12 mm Hg/mL/minute, and group 2, comprising patients with resistance to CSF outflow >12 mm Hg/mL/minute. Negative and positive predictive values were determined. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients in group 1 and 64 patients in group 2. Group 2 significantly showed more acute callosal angle with higher accuracy cutoff value of 90.6°, lower width of temporal horns with higher accuracy cutoff value of 8 mm, and higher percentage of cingulate sulcus sign and disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid space. Matching the radiologic variables, positive predictive values were >80%; however, negative predictive values were low. CONCLUSIONS: Owing to high positive predictive values of matched radiological variables, the lumbar infusion test could be avoided in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. However, when 1 or 2 of the variables are negative, this invasive test should be performed.

Re-Evaluating Simpson Grade I, II, and III Resections in Neurosurgical Treatment of World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas.

BACKGROUND: Since 1957, the Simpson grading system has been considered a predictive system for meningioma recurrence. However, since then, surgical equipment and neurosurgical technique have developed extensively, so this grading system should be re-evaluated. This study aims to assess if the recurrence rate and recurrence-free survival (RFS) are different after Simpson grade I, II, and III resections in World Health Organization (WHO) grade I meningiomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who underwent surgical treatment of WHO grade I meningiomas located in the convexity (group 1), falx/parasagittal (group 2), skull base, and tentorium (group 3) between June 1991 and December 2011. We compared the recurrence rates and RFSs between Simpson grade I, II, and III resections in both overall cases and tumor subsets according to their localization. RESULTS: A total of 224 meningiomas were included in this study. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates and RFSs between Simpson grades I, II, and III. In each of the location groups, no significant differences were noted between the different degrees of Simpson. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that complete resection of WHO grade I meningiomas achieves excellent tumor control, regardless of Simpson grades. More aggressive attempts at tumor resection (ie, Simpson grade I) must be balanced against the risks of removing dura or damaging critical neurovascular structures.