RESUMO
Background: Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a common endocrine disorder. Definitive treatment is surgical. Preoperative localization of diseased glands increases the chance of successful treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluoromethylcholine-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FCh-PET-CT) in preoperative localization of diseased parathyroid glands, when first-line examinations were inconclusive. Methods: This is a retrospective study. All patients with PHPT who underwent 18F-FCh-PET-CT, after inconclusive ultrasound examination and 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile/single-photon emission CT-CT, were included in cohort I. Patients who were subsequently operated for their parathyroid disease, were included in cohort II. The performance of 18F-FCh-PET-CT was analyzed in two sets: per-lesion, and per-gland analysis. Results: Out of 52 patients in cohort I, 18F-FCh-PET-CT identified single or multiple parathyroid lesions in 43 patients (83%). Nine patients had multiglandular disease. Thirty-four (65%) patients were subsequently operated and included in cohort II. Forty-four lesions were removed from these patients and 33 patients (97%) were cured. 18F-FCh-PET-CT localized 40 out of 44 lesions, with per-lesion and per-gland sensitivities of 97% and 95%, and positive predictive values (PPVs) of 93% and 87%, respectively, in addition to a specificity of 97% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 94% in the per-gland analysis. Comparable excellent results were detected in multiglandular disease with sensitivity of 94.1%, specificity of 89%, PPV of 84%, and NPV of 94%. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the high diagnostic performance of 18F-FCh-PET-CT in the preoperative localization of diseased parathyroid gland in patients with PHPT, especially in multiglandular PHPT.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia (PEHH) is a known, but relatively uncommon, complication after esophagectomies. The incidence of PEHH seems to be increasing since the introduction of minimally invasive esophagectomy. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled incidence of PEHH after esophagectomy, and to evaluate if minimally invasive technique is associated with increased risk for PEHH compared to open esophagectomy. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Medline via Ovid and Web of Science was performed. Retrospective and prospective studies in English language describing the incidence or risk factors for PEHH were included. Weighted incidence of PEHH after all types of esophagectomy, and after open or minimally invasive technique was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 7943 esophagectomy patients were included in the analysis. In total, 310 patients (3.9%) were diagnosed with PEHH. The estimated weighted incidence rate for PEHH after open esophagectomy was 0.024 (95% confidence interval: 0.012-0.045) compared to 0.065 (95% confidence interval: 0.040-0.106) after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Odds ratio for PEHH after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open esophagectomy was 2.76 (95% confidence interval: 1.49-5.11). CONCLUSION: The risk for post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia was significantly higher after minimally invasive esophagectomy compared to open technique. Heterogeneity and retrospective designs of the included studies were important limitations of the analysis. Future studies should investigate preventive measures to reduce PEHH after minimally invasive esophagectomy.
