Long-Term Outcomes Using Electron IOERT APBI for Early Stage Breast Cancer: The Verona University Hospital Experience.

METHODS AND MATERIALS: From July 2006 to December 2015, 295 patients suitable for breast-conserving therapy entered a single-arm phase II study and were treated with IOERT as radical treatment. Inclusion criteria were age >50, postmenopausal status, cT1N0M0 stage, grade G1-G2, positive estrogen receptor status; unicentric and unifocal disease, histologically proven invasive ductal carcinoma no previous breast irradiation, good performance status. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 7.1 years (95% CI, 6.5;7.4) 6 women (2.0%) experienced a true local recurrence (reappearance of the tumour in the same quadrant). Five-year overall survival and local recurrence-free survival were 96% (95% CI, 92.9;97.8) and 94.9% (95% CI, 91.6;97.0) respectively. CONCLUSION: Our trial suggests that, in highly selected early stage breast cancers, a single-dose IOERT can be safely delivered with excellent results and very low long-term recurrence rates.

Predictors of Local Control for Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SAbR) in Pulmonary Oligometastases from Gastrointestinal Malignancies.

BACKGROUND/AIM: To assess predictors of local control (LC) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) in pulmonary oligometastatic disease (OMD) from gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with pulmonary OMD treated with SAbR from January 2016 to December 2018 were included in this observational analysis. Primary endpoint was LC. Uni- and multivariate analyses to assess variable correlations were conducted. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients and 59 lung metastases were evaluated. The delivered dose was 30-60 Gy in 3-8 fractions. After a median follow-up of 23.0 months (range=6.3-50.4 months), LC rate at 1/2 years was 89.7%/85.0%, and increased to 96.0%/91.0% for lesions treated with a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥100 Gy (p=0.03). RECIST response at 6 months was predictive for LC (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: SAbR is an effective option for pulmonary OMD from GI malignancies. A BED10 ≥100 Gy and radiological response at 6 months can affect LC.

The Cardiovascular Toxicity of Abiraterone and Enzalutamide in Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The cardiovascular toxicity related to abiraterone and enzalutamide has been previously studied by our group. In this analysis, we aim to update our previous findings related to abiraterone and enzalutamide, including the new available evidence, both in castration-resistant and hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective studies were identified by searching the MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ASCO Meeting abstracts. Combined relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects methods. RESULTS: We included 7 articles in this meta-analysis, covering a total of 8660 patients who were used to evaluate cardiovascular toxicity. The use of new hormonal agents was associated with an increased risk of all-grade (RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.13-1.64; P = .001) and high-grade (RR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.21-2.80; P = .004) cardiac toxicity. The use of new hormonal agents was also associated with an increased risk of all-grade (RR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.62-2.43; P = .001) and high-grade (RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.84-2.77; P = .004) hypertension compared with the controls. Abiraterone was found to significantly increase the risk of both cardiac toxicity and hypertension, whereas enzalutamide significantly increases only the risk of hypertension. No differences were found based on the dose of prednisone used with abiraterone. The major limitation of this study is that data are available only as aggregate, and no single-patient information could be analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Abiraterone and enzalutamide significantly increase the incidence and RR of cardiovascular toxicity in patients affected by metastatic prostate cancer. Follow-up for the onset of treatment-related cardiovascular events should therefore be considered in these patients.

Technical guidelines for head and neck cancer IMRT on behalf of the Italian association of radiation oncology - head and neck working group.

Performing intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on head and neck cancer patients (HNCPs) requires robust training and experience. Thus, in 2011, the Head and Neck Cancer Working Group (HNCWG) of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) organized a study group with the aim to run a literature review to outline clinical practice recommendations, to suggest technical solutions and to advise target volumes and doses selection for head and neck cancer IMRT. The main purpose was therefore to standardize the technical approach of radiation oncologists in this context. The following paper describes the results of this working group. Volumes, techniques/strategies and dosage were summarized for each head-and-neck site and subsite according to international guidelines or after reaching a consensus in case of weak literature evidence.

Relationships between bladder dose-volume/surface histograms and acute urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: DUE01 is an observational study aimed at developing predictive models of genito-urinary toxicity of patients treated for prostate cancer with conventional (1.8-2Gy/fr, CONV) or moderate hypo-fractionation (2.35-2.7Gy/fr, HYPO). The current analysis focused on the relationship between bladder DVH/DSH and the risk of International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS)⩾15/20 at the end of radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Planning and relevant clinical parameters were prospectively collected, including DVH/DSH, LQ-corrected (DVHc/DSHc) and weekly (DVHw/DSHw) histograms. Best parameters were selected by the differences between patients with/without IPSS⩾15/20 at the end of radiotherapy. Logistic uni- and backward multi-variable (MVA) analyses were performed. RESULTS: Data of 247 patients were available (CONV: 116, HYPO: 131). Absolute DVHw/DSHw and DVHc/DSHc predicted the risk of IPSS⩾15 at the end of radiotherapy (n=77/247); an MVA model including baseline IPSS, anti-hypertensive, T stage, the absolute surface receiving ⩾8.5Gy/week and ⩾12.5Gy/week was developed (AUC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.83). Similar AUC values were found if replacing DSHw with DVHw/DVHc/DSHc parameters. The impact of dose-volume/surface parameters remained when excluding patients with baseline IPSS⩾15 and in HYPO. IPSS⩾20 at the end of radiotherapy (n=27/247) was mainly correlated to baseline IPSS and T stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although the baseline IPSS was the main predictor, constraining v8.5w<56cc and v12.5w<5cc may significantly reduce acute GU toxicity.

A two-variable linear model of parotid shrinkage during IMRT for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: To assess anatomical, clinical and dosimetric pre-treatment parameters, possibly predictors of parotid shrinkage during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIALS: Data of 174 parotids from four institutions were analysed; patients were treated with IMRT, with radical and adjuvant intent. Parotid shrinkage was evaluated by the volumetric difference (DeltaV) between parotid volumes at the end and those at the start of the therapy, as assessed by CT images (MVCT for 40 patients, KVCT for 47 patients). Correlation between DeltaVcc/% and a number of dosimetric, clinical and geometrical parameters was assessed. Univariate as well as stepwise logistic multivariate (MVA) analyses were performed by considering as an end-point a DeltaVcc/% larger than the median value. Linear models of DeltaV (continuous variable) based on the most predictive variables found at the MVA were developed. RESULTS: Median DeltaVcc/% were 6.95 cc and 26%, respectively. The most predictive independent variables of DeltaVcc at MVA were the initial parotid volume (IPV, OR: 1.100; p=0.0002) and Dmean (OR: 1.059; p=0.038). The main independent predictors of DeltaV% at MVA were age (OR: 0.968; p=0.041) and V40 (OR: 1.0338; p=0.013). DeltaVcc and DeltaV% may be well described by the equations: DeltaVcc=-2.44+0.076 Dmean (Gy)+0.279 IPV (cc) and DeltaV%=34.23+0.192 V40 (%)-0.2203 age (year). The predictive power of the DeltaVcc model is higher than that of the DeltaV% model. CONCLUSIONS: IPV/age and Dmean/V40 are the major dosimetric and clinical/anatomic predictors of DeltaVcc and DeltaV%. DeltaVcc and DeltaV% may be well described by bi-linear models including the above-mentioned variables.