Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther ; 13(1): 100-108, 2023 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36864976

RESUMO

Background: Pemafibrate is a potent selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator. Whether this agent favorable modulates atherosclerosis in vivo remains unknown. This is the first case report to evaluate serial changes of coronary atherosclerosis under pemafirate use in type 2 diabetic patients already taking a high-intensity statin. Case Description: A 75-year-old gentleman was hospitalized due to peripheral artery disease, which was treated by endovascular treatment. One year later, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurred and severe stenosis at his proximal segment of right coronary artery received primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Due to his suboptimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level with moderate intensity statin, high-intensity one (20 mg atorvastatin) and 10 mg ezetimibe were commenced, which enabled to achieve very low LDL-C level (50 mg/dL). However, he required additional PCI due to progression of left circumflex artery one year after NSTEMI. Despite his optimally controlled LDL-C level (46 mg/dL), near-infrared spectroscopy and intravascular (NIRS/IVUS) imaging after PCI visualized the presence of lipid-rich plaque [maximum 4-mm lipid-core burden index (LCBI4mm) =482] at non-culprit segment in his right coronary artery. Given his continuing residual hypertriglyceridemia (triglyceride =248 mg/dL), 0.2 mg pemafibrate was commenced, which lowered triglyceride to 106 mg/dL. One-year follow-up NIRS/IVUS imaging was conducted to evaluate coronary atheroma. A reduction of attenuated ultrasonic signals was observed, accompanied by plaque calcification. In addition, the amount of yellow signal was lowered, and its MaxLCBI4mm was 358. Since then, this case does not experience any cardiovascular events. His LDL-C and triglyceride-rich lipoprotein levels are favourably controlled. Conclusions: A delipidation of coronary atheroma, accompanied by greater plaque calcification was observed after the commencement of pemafibrate. This finding highlights potential anti-atherosclerotic benefit of pemafibrate use in patients receiving a statin.

3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(3): 528.e3-528.e5, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248270

RESUMO

Coronary artery spasm (CAS) rarely worsens from single-vessel to simultaneous multivessel CAS naturally, and simultaneous multivessel CAS leads to serious conditions such as cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). A 77-year-old Japanese man who took medications for CAS was transferred to our hospital due to persistent chest pain. On arrival, his vital signs were stable, but his electrocardiogram (ECG) showed ST-segment elevation in leads II, III and aVF. Ventricular fibrillation developed suddenly. Although routine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) including intravenous administration of epinephrine was performed immediately, he could not be resuscitated. After initiation of percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS), there was a return of spontaneous circulation. His ECG showed exacerbation of myocardial ischemia with ST-segment elevation in leads I, II, III, aVL, aVF and V3-V6. Emergency coronary angiography revealed severe CAS of the right and left coronary arteries, which was relieved completely by intracoronary administration of nitrates. He was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction due to simultaneous 3-vessel CAS that progressed over time. About 6h after arrival, he developed hemodynamic instability and died. CAS worsened from single-vessel to simultaneous 3-vessel spasm, and intracoronary administration of nitrates was effective in relieving CAS, which was documented by the ECG and coronary angiogram. Since CAS can progress over time, nitrates must be administered immediately. When CAS leads to CPA, epinephrine may be ineffective in CPR because of its vasoconstrictive effect on coronary arteries; therefore, PCPS should be initiated, and intracoronary nitrates should be administered.


Assuntos
Vasoespasmo Coronário/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Idoso , Dor no Peito/etiologia , Angiografia Coronária , Vasoespasmo Coronário/diagnóstico , Vasoespasmo Coronário/diagnóstico por imagem , Progressão da Doença , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...