Efficacy and safety of triple therapy (fluvastatin-bezafibrate-cholestyramine) for severe familial hypercholesterolemia.

Familial hypercholesterolemia carries a markedly increased risk of coronary artery disease. Reduction of plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to the normal range may prevent premature atherosclerosis and usually requires a combination of cholesterol-lowering drugs such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors plus resins or fibrates. The current, 60-week, open-label investigation involved 22 patients whose plasma LDL-C had not reached the target level for prevention of coronary artery disease in 3 previous studies using fluvastatin alone and in combination with other cholesterol-lowering medications. At the beginning of the current study, patients were stabilized on fluvastatin monotherapy at 40 mg/day. After 6 weeks, the daily treatment changed to a combination of fluvastatin 40 mg/day in the evening and bezafibrate 400 mg/day in the morning. After a further 6 weeks, a lunchtime dose of cholestyramine 8 g/day was added, to form triple cholesterol-lowering therapy. Efficacy was determined by plasma lipid/lipoprotein analysis. Baseline levels were assessed after 4 weeks of placebo treatment, prior to active treatment, in the first fluvastatin study. Safety analyses included liver and renal function tests, creatine phosphokinase levels and blood counts. Compliance was determined by counting the fluvastatin capsules, bezafibrate tablets, and cholestyramine sachets returned by the patients at each visit. The triple-drug combination used in this study was more effective than the double therapy and resulted in stabilization of the LDL-C:high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio, at a reduction from baseline ranging from -40.4 to -52.5%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Fluvastatin in primary hypercholesterolemia: efficacy and safety in patients at high risk. An analysis of a clinical trial database.

Patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and established coronary artery disease (CAD) with additional associated risk factors for atherosclerosis are considered for lipid-lowering drug therapy at lower levels of total and/or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than are patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia. As regards prevention of cardiovascular morbid events, high-risk patients are expected to receive the most benefit from lipid-lowering treatment. Thus, it is of interest to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the new lipid-lowering agent fluvastatin, a new, wholly synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, in patients at high risk. A retrospective analysis was based on data from controlled clinical trials in which 1,815 patients were treated with fluvastatin at a daily dose of > or = 20 mg and 783 patients received placebo. Of the fluvastatin-treated patients, 328 (18.1%) had CAD compared with 136 (17.4%) patients taking placebo. Within these groups, 186 fluvastatin patients and 75 placebo patients had at least one of the following additional risk factors: hypertension, obesity, and/or fasting blood glucose levels above the upper limit of normal (ULN). Patients at high risk, as defined above, were compared with patients without CAD or any risk factors (fluvastatin, n = 837; placebo, n = 375). The effect of 40 mg of fluvastatin on LDL and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides tended to be enhanced in patients at high risk (HR) compared with those at low risk (LR). Changes from baseline in HR patients were: LDL-C, -26.6%; HDL-C, 6.4%; triglycerides, -13%. Changes in LR patients were: LDL-C, -24.8%; HDL-C, 4.4%; triglycerides, -6%. All of these changes were highly significant (0.001 < p < 0.01). No patient in the HR group experienced a confirmed (measured on two consecutive occasions) increase > 3 x ULN in aspartate (ASAT) or alanine (ALAT) aminotransferases, nor any notable increases in creatine kinase > 10 x ULN. The tolerability of fluvastatin, as assessed by analysis of adverse events, was not consistently influenced by concomitant high risk. This exploratory analysis of the efficacy and safety profile of fluvastatin in patients at high risk for atherosclerosis suggests that such treatment is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated. The observed tendency toward an improved efficacy in the high-risk group will need further confirmation using data from prospective studies in such patients.

Fluvastatin in familial hypercholesterolemia: a cohort analysis of the response to combination treatment.

A recent randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial revealed differences in the response of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia to combination therapy with the new, wholly synthetic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor fluvastatin, 20 mg/day and then 40 mg/day, plus the fibric acid analogue bezafibrate, 400 mg/day, vs combination therapy with fluvastatin, 40 mg/day, plus the bile acid sequestrant (resin) cholestyramine, 8 g/day. The main purpose of the present cohort analysis was to determine whether these differences in lipid response were related to imbalances in the patients' prior responses to up to 42 weeks of fluvastatin monotherapy, 20 mg/day, 40 mg/day, and, in some patients, 60 mg/day, in 2 earlier studies. For the present analysis, we identified 18 patients in the fluvastatin plus bezafibrate group (cohort 1) and 16 patients in the fluvastatin plus cholestyramine group (cohort 2) for whom complete dose-response data were available for the full 56-week duration of all 3 studies. Subsets of 7 patients in cohort 1 and 8 patients in cohort 2 had received the 60 mg/day fluvastatin dose during a previous monotherapy study. In cohort 1, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased by 19% with 20 mg/day fluvastatin, by 27% with 40 mg/day fluvastatin, by 31% with 20 mg/day fluvastatin plus bezafibrate, and by 35% with 40 mg/day fluvastatin plus bezafibrate, and the LDL-C/high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio had fallen by 46% at the end of combination therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of a combination fluvastatin-bezafibrate treatment for familial hypercholesterolemia: comparative analysis with a fluvastatin-cholestyramine combination.

PURPOSE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carries a markedly increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Reduction of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to the normal range may prevent premature atherosclerosis and usually requires a combination of cholesterol-lowering drugs. The major objective of this study is to compare two different drug combinations for the treatment of heterozygous FH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The current investigation is a short-term, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin when combined with cholestyramine (group 1) or with bezafibrate (group 2) in 38 patients with heterozygous FH. RESULTS: After 6 weeks of combination treatment, in comparison to a drug-free baseline (patients receiving single-blind placebo during the lead-in period of an earlier study, ie, before ever receiving fluvastatin), the combination of 40 mg/d of fluvastatin with 400 mg/d of bezafibrate in group 2 reduced plasma LDL-C levels by 35% as compared with 32% in group 1, and reduced the LDL-C/high-density cholesterol (HDL-C) ratio by 46%, compared to 37% in group 1 (a non-significant difference for both comparisons). When compared to an intermittent 6-week open-label administration of 40 mg fluvastatin monotherapy, the addition of cholestyramine or bezafibrate each reduced LDL-C by an additional 13% (P < 0.01 for both regimens). CONCLUSIONS: Fluvastatin-bezafibrate is superior to a fluvastatin-cholestyramine combination for lowering serum triglycerides and elevating HDL-C serum levels in patients in conjunction with a significant lowering of LDL-C/HDL-C ratios, and may be an effective synergistic therapy for heterozygous FH. No episodes of myositis were seen in this short-term study, a finding that is in agreement with most of the reported studies on statin-fibrate combinations reviewed here.

Efficacy and safety of fluvastatin in women with primary hypercholesterolaemia.

Women with primary hypercholesterolaemia are often considered for lipid-lowering drug therapy at a later age than men. With regard to the prevention of cardiovascular morbidity, women can expect to receive the same benefits from lipid-lowering treatment as men. Thus, it is of interest to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the new lipid-lowering agent fluvastatin in women. A retrospective analysis was made on the basis of data from controlled clinical trials in which 1815 patients were treated with fluvastatin at a daily dose of > or = 20 mg, and 783 patients received placebo. 782 of the fluvastatin-treated patients (43.1%) and 315 patients on placebo (40.2%) were women. Within these groups, 577 patients (73.8%) treated with fluvastatin and 183 patients receiving placebo (78.4%) were at least 50 years of age. The effect of fluvastatin 40 mg/day on low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was more favourable in women than in men. In women, the change from baseline was -26.7% for LDL cholesterol and 5.3% for HDL cholesterol. In men, the equivalent changes from baseline were -23.8% and 4.0%, respectively. All changes from baseline were highly significant (p < 0.001). Fluvastatin lowered triglycerides to a similar extent in women and men (7.1% vs 6.9%, respectively). More women than men experienced a confirmed increase in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) when receiving fluvastatin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of fluvastatin in hypertensive patients. An analysis of a clinical trial database.

The concurrence of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia leads to the clinical need to lower lipids in hypertensive patients. Thus, it is interesting to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin, a new 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA)-reductase inhibitor, in such a patient population. A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety of fluvastatin was based on the data from 1815 patients who received fluvastatin at daily doses of > or = 20 mg compared with 783 patients taking placebo. The results showed that 332 (18.3%) of the fluvastatin-treated and 124 (15.8%) of the placebo-treated patients were identified as having hypertension. The percentage change from baseline of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypertensive patients taking fluvastatin at doses of 20 and 40 mg/day was -20% and -26%, respectively (placebo: 1.4%), and did not differ from the response in non-hypertensive patients. Increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) as well as decreases in triglycerides with fluvastatin were not consistently different between hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Irrespective of the presence or absence of hypertension, confirmed (measured on two consecutive occasions) increases > three times the upper limit of normal in aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) were observed in three (0.2%) and 12 (0.7%) patients, respectively. With placebo, ALAT was increased in two patients (0.2%). The incidence of notable increases more than 10 times the upper limit of normal in creatine kinase was similar with fluvastatin compared with placebo (0.3% in both).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Safety and tolerability of fluvastatin with concomitant use of antihypertensive agents. An analysis of a clinical trial database.

The coexistence of hypercholesterolemia and hypertension often requires concomitant drug treatments. Thus, it is interesting to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of the new lipid-lowering agent fluvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA)-reductase inhibitor, in patients receiving concomitant antihypertensive/cardiovascular drug treatments. A retrospective analysis was based on data from controlled clinical trials in which 1815 patients were treated with fluvastatin and 783 patients received placebo. The daily dose of fluvastatin was > or = 20 mg. At least one of the following drug treatments was taken by 445 of the fluvastatin-treated patients (24.5%) and 181 of those receiving placebo (23.1%): beta-adrenergic-receptor blockers (fluvastatin: n = 182; placebo: n = 84); diuretics (fluvastatin: n = 168; placebo: n = 72); calcium antagonists (fluvastatin: n = 161; placebo: n = 69); and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (fluvastatin: n = 101; placebo: n = 30). The majority of patients received monotherapy with one of the above-mentioned antihypertensive agents (fluvastatin: 69%; placebo: 65%). The efficacy of fluvastatin in modifying low-density lipoprotein (LDL)- and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglyceride levels was not consistently different in patients taking a given antihypertensive compared with the overall group and the patients not taking the antihypertensive agent. In patients taking fluvastatin and antihypertensives, confirmed (measured at two consecutive occasions) increases more than three times the upper limit of normal in aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) occurred in only two patients. One case involved the concomitant use of a beta-blocker (ASAT and ALAT) and the other a diuretic (ALAT).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and safety of high dose fluvastatin in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia.

The efficacy and safety of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor fluvastatin have been evaluated in a double blind study in 52 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. A standard AHA Phase II lipid lowering diet was prescribed throughout the study. After 6 weeks of a single blind dosage stabilisation period, in which patients received fluvastatin 40 mg qPM, patients were randomly allocated to one of two double blind treatment groups: group A (n = 24) received fluvastatin 20 mg b.d. for 12 weeks and fluvastatin 20 mg AM + 40 mg PM for an additional 12 weeks; Group B (n = 28) received fluvastatin 40 mg qPM during the entire study. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by the analysis of biochemical and haematological parameters, and ophthalmological and physical examinations. Efficacy was analysed by the determination of plasma lipids, lipoproteins and apoproteins. Fluvastatin 40 mg/d was associated with up to a 27.4% decrease in LDL-C and a 9.6% increase in HDL-C concentrations. Increasing the dose of fluvastatin from 20 mg b.d. to 60 mg per day in Group A was associated with a 7.1% decrease in LDL-C, a 12.1% increase of HDL-C and a 12.8% decrease in the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio. In comparison with Group B (40 mg qPM) LDL-C, HDL-C and the LDL-C/HDL-C ratio in Group A (60 mg) differed by -8.9%, 6.6% and -12%, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Preparation and properties of gel-peptide immunoadsorbents.

The chemical complexity of peptides limits the choice of coupling procedures which can be used in the preparation of gel-peptide conjugates. Several immunoadsorbents have been investigated, in order to select those that permit the isolation of antipeptide antibodies in the highest yield and with optimal specific activity.

Do monoclonal antibodies recognize linear sequential determinants?

A group of 19 anti-class II monoclonal antibodies produced in different laboratories were tested in ELISA for their ability to bind to a panel of synthetic peptides selected from HLA-DQ alpha and beta chains. No one of the antibodies tested was found to react with the synthetic fragments, thus confirming the common finding that MoAbs generally fail to recognize fragments of the native antigen. The possibility that this result might be partly due to the procedure used for screening hybridoma supernatants is discussed.

Restriction of anti-peptide antibody specificity by enzyme-modified Sepharose-peptide immunoadsorbents.

Sepharose-peptide immunoadsorbents, employed for the isolation of specific antibodies from the sera of rabbits immunized with carrier protein-peptide conjugates, were digested with suitable proteolytic enzymes, in order to obtain the splitting of a part of the peptide bound to the gel. This new modified immunoadsorbent can be advantageously used for the isolation of antibody subsets, that do not cross-react with related peptides exhibiting high sequence homology with the immunogens.

Identification of linear HLA class II amino acid sequences recognized by rabbit antisera against native molecules.

A rabbit was immunized with B lymphoblastoid cells, and subsets of the antibodies produced were isolated on affinity columns made from synthetic peptides corresponding to known amino acid sequences from the human class II antigens DQ and DP. Those peptides for which specific antibodies were isolated could be assumed to contribute to the antigenic properties of the intact antigen. The antibody subsets were tested for binding to synthetic peptides, to glycoprotein fractions isolated from cells with different DR and DQ specificities, and to the cells used for immunization of the rabbit. The isolation of those antibodies directed against well-defined amino acid stretches of the histocompatibility antigens is proof of the role of those regions in determining the antigenic properties of these molecules.

Recognition of HLA class II molecules by antipeptide antibodies elicited by synthetic peptides selected from regions of HLA-DP antigens.

Repeated immunizations of rabbits with chemically synthesized peptides from selected regions of HLA-DP histocompatibility antigens resulted in the production of specific antibodies that were then isolated from the immune sera by chromatography on Sepharose-peptide immunoadsorbents. The purified antibodies, when tested with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, specifically bound to the inciting fragments; moreover, two of them recognized glycoproteins extracted by nonionic detergents from human chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells, as revealed by binding assays. The results suggest that amino acid stretches 51-61 of the alpha chain and 80-90 of the beta chain of HLA-DP histocompatibility antigens are likely exposed on the surface of the protein molecule. The specific recognition of DP regions is strongly suggested by the difference in the binding of those antibodies to soluble membrane proteins, as compared to the binding of monomorphic anti-Class II monoclonal antibodies to the same antigens.