Focal Nodular Hyperplasia After Treatment With Oxaliplatin: A Multiinstitutional Series of Cases Diagnosed at MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Benign hepatic lesions may occur after chemotherapy treatment and may mimic metastases at imaging. We describe focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) lesions diagnosed at MRI that occurred de novo after treatment with oxaliplatin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a multiinstitutional case series. We report 14 adult patients with cancer (eight men and six women) with a history of treatment with oxaliplatin and development of new hepatic lesions diagnosed as FNH at pathologic analysis or MRI or both. Imaging and pathology features of the included lesions, the interval since chemotherapy, and the temporal evolution were reviewed. RESULTS: The mean interval between the completion of oxaliplatin treatment and the identification of new hepatic FNH at imaging was 47.6 months. In seven of 14 (50%) patients, the index lesion was diagnosed at pathologic analysis (biopsy or resection) as FNH. In the remaining seven cases, the diagnosis was based on highly accurate MRI features (e.g., hyper- or isointensity of the lesion on hepatobiliary phase images). Lesion growth or occurrence of new lesions was present in 75% of patients at imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION: FNH lesions can occur de novo after treatment with oxaliplatin. Recognizing the typical MRI appearance of these lesions may avoid unnecessary biopsy or surgery and reduce patients' anxiety.

Umbilical venous catheters placement evaluation on frontal radiogram: application of a simplified flow-chart for radiology residents.

BACKGROUND: Umbilical Venous Catheter (UVC) are commonly used in neonatal period; they can be not correctly positioned and could be associated with complications. The purpose of this article is to suggest a flow-chart to evaluate the placement of UVC, testing it in young radiologists-in-training. METHOD: We developed a simple flow-chart to asses, steps by step, UVC placement considering its course and tip location (ideally placed in the atriocaval junction). We tested the flow-chart impact asking to 20 residents to evaluate the placement of 10 UVC before and after they familiarized with the flow-chart and the anatomical findings of a newborn. The agreement among the 20 students was evaluated too. RESULTS: The number of correct characterizations was different due to the administration of the flow-chart. One hundred and six correct UVC assessments at the beginning switched to 196 after the administration of the flow-chart (p = 0.0001). The observed agreement among the twenty radiology residents was statistically significant, both before (kappa = 0.41, p < 0.001) and after (kappa = 0.37, p < 0.001) the flow-chart administration. CONCLUSION: The developed flow-chart demonstrated to be useful in increasing residents performance in UVC placement assessment.