Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel was studied in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer in a phase I component followed by a phase II trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated between October 1993 and April 1997. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, etoposide 80 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 to 3, and paclitaxel 130 mg/m(2) on day 1 over 3 hours. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The MTD was reached in the first six patients. In these six patients and in the next 35 patients, who were entered onto the phase II trial, response and survival were estimated. RESULTS: At the initial dose level, one of six patients developed febrile neutropenia, and five of six achieved targeted neutropenia (nadir absolute granulocyte count, 100 to 1,000/microL) without any other dose-limiting toxicity, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 88 (47%) of 188 total courses administered at or less than the MTD. Neutropenia was associated with fever in only 17 (9%) of 188 courses, but two patients experienced neutropenic sepsis that was fatal. Nonhematologic toxicity greater than grade 2 was observed in 10 (5%) of 188 total courses, with fatigue, peripheral neuropathy, and nausea/vomiting most common. The overall objective response rate was 90% of 38 assessable patients: six complete responses (16%) and 28 partial responses(74%). Median progression-free and overall survival durations were 31 and 47 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel produced response and survival rates similar to those of other combinations and was well tolerated.

A pilot clinical laboratory trial of paclitaxel and endobronchial brachytherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Paclitaxel enhances microtubule assembly and causes a cell cycle arrest in mitosis, the most radiosensitive phase. We conducted this study to improve our understanding of paclitaxel effects in vivo and to determine the maximum tolerated dose of paclitaxel preceding endobronchial radiation therapy (brachytherapy). The treatment consisted of two cycles of paclitaxel infused over 24 hours followed by 192Ir brachytherapy; cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. Tumor samples were obtained at baseline, after each paclitaxel infusion, and 3 weeks after completion of therapy. Twenty-two non-small cell lung cancer patients with a documented endobronchial lesion were enrolled in the study and 20 patients received the therapy with different doses of paclitaxel, initially without and then later with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support (5 microg/kg subcutaneously on days 3 to 10). With the starting paclitaxel dose of 135 mg/m2, five of seven patients developed neutropenia and fever, which mandated a dose reduction to 120 mg/m2. At this dose level, three of three patients had neutropenic fever; thus, 120 mg/m2 of paclitaxel was considered above the maximum tolerated dose without G-CSF support. However, with G-CSF support the therapy was well-tolerated without dose-limiting toxicity and accrual is continuing at the paclitaxel 175-mg/m2 dose level. While no patient had achieved systemic tumor response, 11 patients achieved partial response of the endobronchial lesion, which represents 68.8% of 16 patients who received two courses of therapy and 91.8% of 12 patients who had full evaluation by bronchoscopy after completion of therapy. The in vivo paclitaxel effects were studied using the pre- and post-paclitaxel therapy tumor samples in eight patients. Four (50%) patients had a significant increase in mitotic cells after paclitaxel, as assessed by MPM-2 immunostaining that recognizes a large family of mitotic phosphoproteins. A substantial increase in the number of micronucleated apoptotic cells, another paclitaxel effect, was also found in six patients. These results clearly indicate that patients with endobronchial lesions from recurrent NSCLC could not tolerate this combined modality regimen without G-CSF support. However, this group of patients provided a unique opportunity to study in vivo paclitaxel effects in a clinical trial setting.

Phase II trial of recombinant IFN-alpha2a with etoposide/cisplatin induction and interferon/megestrol acetate maintenance in extensive small cell lung cancer.

Previous data suggested interaction of cisplatin with interferon (IFN) in non-small cell lung cancer and a possible effect of IFN in maintaining remission in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study was designed to further examine the effect of IFN in the treatment of extensive disease (ED) SCLC. Forty previously untreated patients with performance status (PS) of 0-2 (Zubrod scale) were treated with etoposide (100 mg/m2 for 3 days), cisplatin (25 mg/m2 for 3 days) (EP), and recombinant IFN-alpha2a (rIFN-alpha2a) (5 x 10(6) U/m2 for 3 days) for six cycles (induction), followed by rIFN-alpha2a (5 x 10(6) U/m2) thrice weekly and megestrol acetate (40 mg q.i.d.) as maintenance therapy for 6 months or until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity was documented. Patients were 25 men (62%) and 15 women (38%), median age 58 (28-76), median Zubrod performance status 1 (0-2). Major sites of metastasis include liver (55%), bone (42%), bone marrow (25%), and adrenal gland (18%). Of 40 eligible patients accrued to this trial, 35 were evaluable for response, and 37 were evaluable for toxicity. There were 3 complete and 28 partial responses, for an overall response rate of 89%. With 39 of 40 patients followed until death, median survival (Kaplan-Meier) is estimated at 46 weeks (95% CI range 35-55). Twenty patients completed six cycles of induction, and 16 received maintenance therapy, median 2 cycles (range 1-3). Major toxicity during induction included grade 4 granulocytopenia in 24%, grade 2-3 nausea or vomiting or both in 41%, grade 2 fatigue in 24%, grade 2 anorexia in 22%, and grade 2-3 renal insufficiency in 9% of 175 total courses of chemotherapy administered. Toxicity during the maintenance phase was notable for grade 2-3 fatigue in 43%, grade 2-3 anorexia in 24%, grade 2-3 weight loss in 10%, and grade 3-4 anemia in 17% of 30 courses. There were no treatment-related deaths. The addition of rIFN-alpha2a to EP in induction chemotherapy of ED SCLC, followed by rIFN-alpha2a and megestrol acetate maintenance therapy, was reasonably well tolerated. The complete and overall response rates and duration of remission and survival appear to be similar to those generally obtained with EP alone in similar patients.

Integration of filgrastim into chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study.

PURPOSE: Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim. RESULTS: Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete). CONCLUSIONS: Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.

Cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide (PIE) was studied in patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) in a Phase I trial followed by a Phase II trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates. METHODS: Thirty-three patients were treated between October 1991 and December 1994. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2/day with mesna (all given intravenously on Days 1-3), and oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 on Days 4-17. This cycle was repeated every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. The MTD was reached for the first 9 patients. For these 9 patients and the next 24 patients, who were entered in the Phase II trial, response and survival were estimated. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicity was manifested as Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 of 3 patients (associated with fever in 2 of 3), and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was encountered in 2 of 3 patients at the second dose level. Of 6 patients treated at the first dose level, 4 achieved targeted myelosuppression (absolute granulocyte count nadir <1000), but only 1 experienced Grade 4 neutropenia, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia was observed in 36 (24%) of a total of 152 courses administered at or below the MTD. Nonhematologic toxicity above Grade 2 was uncommon, excluding nausea and vomiting. Overall objective response rate was 93% of 30 evaluable patients: 5 (17%) complete responses and 23 partial responses (76%). Median failure free and overall survival durations were 36 and 54 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide produced encouraging failure free and overall median survival rates in patients with extensive SCLC. These results warrant further evaluation of this regimen in the initial therapy of patients with limited stage disease.

Phase I clinical and pharmacological study of liposome-entrapped NDDP administered intrapleurally in patients with malignant pleural effusions.

cis-Bis-neodecanoato-trans-R,R-1,2-diaminocyclohexane platinum(II) (NDDP) is a lipophilic non-cross-resistant platinum compound formulated in large multilamellar liposomes (1-3 micrometer). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of liposomal-entrapped NDDP (L-NDDP) administered i.v. in humans is 300 mg/m2, and myelosuppresion is the dose-limiting toxicity. L-NDDP administered i.p. is absorbed slowly from the peritoneal cavity of rats. Recently, i.p. cisplatin has been shown to be superior to i.v. cisplatin in improving the survival of patients with ovarian carcinoma and minimal residual disease. We conducted a Phase I study to determine the MTD, side effects, kinetics of absorption into the systemic circulation, and preliminary antitumor activity of L-NDDP administered intrapleurally in patients with free-flowing malignant pleural effusions. Twenty-one patients were treated with escalating doses of L-NDDP by intrapleural administration over 30 min every 21 days. Fourteen patients had adenocarcinoma of the lung, 5 patients had malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), and 2 patients had ovarian carcinoma. The dose-limiting toxicity of L-NDDP was chest pain secondary to chemical pleuritis, which was severe in three of four patients treated at 550 mg/m2. The MTD was 450 mg/m2. At this dose, the only toxicity observed was grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting presenting 6-8 h after drug administration. Neither myelosuppression nor nephrotoxicity was observed. Loculation of residual pleural fluid with continued decrease over a period of weeks to months was observed in seven patients; in one of these patients (MPM), the pleural effusion disappeared without evidence of recurrence for 19 + months, and in six patients (three adenocarcinoma of the lung, two MPM, and one ovarian carcinoma), the pleural effusion was reduced by >50% for 5+, 10+, 18+, 8, 5+, and 2+ months. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies showed that the absorption of L-NDDP from the pleural cavity was rapid during the first 2 h, with levels becoming steady (bioavailable or free platinum) or increasing slowly (total plasma platinum) between 6 and 24 h after administration. Urinary excretion was negligible (1-3%). We conclude that: (a) the MTD of intrapleural L-NDDP is 50% higher than the MTD after i.v. administration; (b) intrapleural L-NDDP causes mild nausea and vomiting and no myelosuppression at the MTD; and (c) the absorption of L-NDDP into the systemic circulation is much slower than that of the parent compound cisplatin. Because of the favorable depot effect, lack of systemic toxicity, and control of the pleural effusion in three of five patients with MPM, a disease similar to ovarian carcinoma in that it tends to remain confined to a body cavity, a Phase II study of intrapleural L-NDDP administered in patients with MPM is in progress.

Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of the novel nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and efficacy in this population. PATIENT AND METHODS: Eligibility requirements included stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 1, and no prior chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. We enrolled patients at doses that ranged from 1,000 to 2,800 mg/m2/wk (three patients per cohort). Responses were assessed after every two courses (8 weeks). RESULTS: We treated 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III (n = 5) or IV (n = 28) NSCLC. Most had performance status 1, and 67% had adenocarcinoma. Eight of 32 assessable patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The projected median survival duration (all patients) is 49 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose was 2,200 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks; dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression and reversible transaminase elevation. Other side effects were consistently mild. The maximum dose-intensity achieved with the first two cycles was 2,362 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks, which is a feasible phase II starting dose. CONCLUSION: This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.

Treatment of patients with small-cell lung cancer refractory to etoposide and cisplatin with the topoisomerase I poison topotecan.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) refractory to etoposide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Refractoriness to etoposide was defined as lack of response to etoposide-containing frontline therapy, or progression during or within 3 months of the last dose of etoposide-containing frontline or second-line therapy. Other eligibility criteria were presence of measurable disease, Zubrod scale performance status (PS) < or = 2, < or = two prior chemotherapy regimens, and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.25 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were registered, of whom 28 are fully assessable. All patients had been treated with frontline etoposide and cisplatin. Three patients (11%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations, 7, 8, and 19 weeks) and two (7%) achieved a minor response; five patients (17%) had stable disease and 18 (65%) had progressive disease. One of the three patients who achieved a PR had failed to respond to frontline cisplatin and etoposide. The overall median survival duration was 20 weeks. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 70% and 31% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 non-hematological toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematological toxicities (in percentage of patients) consisted of nausea (41%, 8%) and vomiting (25%, 11%), and alopecia (100%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has modest antitumor activity in SCLC patients refractory to etoposide and cisplatin, which indicates that clinical resistance to the topoisomerase II poison etoposide does not confer cross-sensitivity to the topoisomerase I poison TPT. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.

Phase II study of topotecan in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously untreated with chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the anti-tumor activity of topotecan (TPT) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously untreated with chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC with measurable disease in nonradiated fields were eligible. Other eligibility criteria were Zubrod performance status (PS) < or = 2 and adequate renal and liver function. TPT was administered at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2/d for 5 days over 30 minutes every 21 days. Of 48 registered patients, 40 were fully assessable. Nineteen patients had adenocarcinoma (AD), 14 squamous carcinoma (SCC), and seven poorly differentiated carcinoma. RESULTS: Six patients (15%) achieved a partial remission (PR) (durations: 8, 14, 18, 28, 56, and 61 weeks) and four patients a minor response; 10 patients had stable disease and 20 patients progressive disease. The PR rate was 36% (five of 14 patients) in patients with SCC versus 4% (one of 26 patients) in those with other histologies (P = .014). The overall median survival time was 38 weeks and 30% of patients were alive at 1 year. Grade 3 to 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred after 76% and 10% of courses administered, respectively. No grade 3 to 4 nonhematologic toxicities were observed. Grade 1 or 2 nonhematologic toxicities consisted of nausea (46% and 5%), vomiting (31% and 7%), and fatigue (53% and 16%). CONCLUSION: TPT at the dose and schedule used has moderate antitumor activity in NSCLC; its activity is mostly limited to patients with SCC. TPT is well tolerated, with myelosuppression of short duration being the most common and limiting toxicity.

Prospective study of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin for unresectable or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to determine the efficacy and side effects of a combination of cyclophosphamide (C), doxorubicin (D), and cisplatin (P) in patients with inoperable, unresectable, or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Twenty-three patients with unresectable or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma were entered onto the study. The median age was 62 years (range, 42-74 years); there were 20 males and 3 females; the median performance status was 1 (Zubrod's scale). The histologic types included epithelial (14 patients), sarcomatoid (4 patients), unclassified (4 patients), and mixed type (1 patient). Twenty patients were known to have been exposed to asbestos and 3 were not. All patients were treated with the following starting dose of chemotherapy: a cycle comprised of C, 500 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1; D, 50 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1; and P, 80 mg/m2 intravenously, day 1 every 3 weeks. The cisplatin dose was reduced to 50 mg/m2 for the subsequent courses. For the assessment of tumor response, all patients had computed tomography scans of the chest after each three cycles of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Overall, 7 of 23 patients (30%) had partial responses (durations of responses [weeks]: 158+, 91+, 70+, 41+, 40, 39, 25), three had minor responses, and 14 had stable or progressive disease. One partial responder later underwent surgical resection and no viable tumors cells were found in the pathologic specimen. All patients have stopped treatment, and eight are still alive. The most common side effect was granulocytopenia (grade 4, 52%; grade 3, 17%). Other hematologic side effects were modest. Nonhematologic side effects included mild to moderate nausea and vomiting, neutropenic fever (three patients), peripheral neuropathy (one patient), and congestive heart failure (one patient). The overall median duration of survival was 60 weeks. CONCLUSION: Combination chemotherapy with CDP was well tolerated and had significant activity against unresectable or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma. The median duration of responses was 60 weeks; however, the survival rate was far from satisfactory. Continued development of new approaches including the biologic understanding of tumor development and testing new agents is warranted.

Phase II study of docetaxel for advanced or metastatic platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to determine the response to and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. The responses of 42 of 44 patients were assessable. Most patients had a Zubrod performance status of 1; the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma (61%), and 91% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS: Nine of 42 assessable patients (21%) achieved a partial response to treatment. The median response duration (from response to progression) was 17 weeks, and the projected median survival duration of all patients is 42 weeks (51 weeks for adenocarcinoma and 22 weeks for nonadenocarcinoma). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 85% of patients and was associated with fever that required intravenous antibiotics in 16% of patients (3% of cycles). Other acute side effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions and dermatitis. Cumulative side effects included fluid retention and neuropathy. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has notable activity against platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 21% major response rate. Primary side effects were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Interdigitating versus concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for limited small cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Sequencing and timing of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for limited small-cell lung cancer (LSCLC) was studied in two consecutive trials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the interdigitating (IDG) trial, three cycles of COPE (cyclophosphamide 750 mg/M2 i.v. Day 1, vincristine 2 mg i.v. Day 8, cisplatin [DDP] 20 mg/M2 Days 1-3, etoposide 100 mg/M2 i.v. Days 1-3), were followed by thoracic radiation therapy (1.5 Gy bid 5-6 h apart, repeated twice at 3-week intervals) to give 45 Gy in 9 weeks; COPE was given during the intervals and for two more cycles. Operable patients had thoracotomy followed by IDG. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI), 2.0 Gy x 15 fractions with a total dose of 30 Gy in 3 weeks, was given to the complete responders (CR) after completion of chemotherapy. In the concurrent (CON) trial, patients received DDP 60 mg/M2 i.v. Day 1, and etoposide 120 mg/M2 i.v. Days 1-3 for four cycles, every 3 weeks, and concurrent thoracic radiation therapy to 45 Gy with either 1.8 Gy daily, for 5 weeks or 1.5 Gy bid for 3 weeks. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was given to the complete responders, 2.5 Gy daily for 2 weeks (25 Gy) (approximately 3 months after the initiation of treatment). RESULTS: The IDG group had 28 evaluable patients with median follow-up of 17.5 months. The CON group had 33 evaluable patients with median follow-up of 21 months. Overall survival rates for IDG patients were 79% at 1 year, 39% at 2 years, 30% at 3 years, and 27% at 4 years compared to 93%, 70%, 51%, and 46%, respectively, for the patients treated with CON (p = 0.01). Loco-regional recurrence (44%) and distant metastasis (48%) was more frequent as the first site of failure in the IDG group compared to the CON group (30% and 30%, respectively). Brain metastases constituted 30% of first metastases with IDG compared to none with CON. Esophagitis was significantly greater with CON. Hematologic and pulmonary toxicity were similar with IDG and CON. One death due to infection was seen in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy appears to be more effective than IDG. Earlier administration of PCI with concurrent chemotherapy and thoracic irradiation may reduce the risk of brain metastasis.

Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II study to determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 41 chemotherapy-naive patients who had stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancer with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed after every one to two treatment courses. Responses of 39 of 41 patients were assessable. The patient's median age was 63 years; 90% of patients had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (54%), and 90% of patients had stage IV disease. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (33%) achieved a partial response to treatment, and the median response duration was 14 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 97% of patient; this was usually of brief duration and was associated with serious infection in 17% of patients. Other acute toxic effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions (36% of patients) and dermatitis (74%). We also observed fluid retention (with peripheral edema or pleural effusion or both) in 54% of patients. This was a cumulative side effect that generally occurred late in treatment. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 33% major response rate. Primary toxicities were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron alone and in combination with intravenous dexamethasone in the prevention of high-dose cisplatin-induced emesis.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of ondansetron alone with that of ondansetron plus dexamethasone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group design. Chemotherapy-naive patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran, Cerenex Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg for three doses every 4 hours beginning 30 minutes before cisplatin administration either alone or in combination with dexamethasone 20 mg administered 45 minutes before cisplatin. Cisplatin (> or = 100 mg/m2) was administered as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes (EEs), adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients were enrolled. Of these, 245 were assessable for efficacy. Patients who received ondansetron plus dexamethasone had a higher complete antiemetic response rate (61% v 46%, P = .02) and less nausea (posttreatment visual analog scale mean 18.2 v 32.8, P < .001) than did those who received ondansetron alone. The time to the first EE was longer for patients in the group that received ondansetron plus dexamethasone (P = .005). Headache (12%), diarrhea (2%), and abdominal colic (1%) were the most common antiemetic-related adverse events reported. The incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. CONCLUSION: IV ondansetron in combination with dexamethasone is safe and more effective than ondansetron alone in the prevention of emesis induced by high-dose cisplatin.

Phase II study of taxol in patients with untreated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Taxol, a complex plant product (a diterpene) extracted from the bark of Taxus brevifolia, has demonstrated substantial anticancer activity in ovarian and breast cancers, malignant melanoma, and acute myelogenous leukemia. Due to allergic reactions in phase I and early phase II studies, use of a 24-hour infusion of taxol with prophylactic dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and cimetidine has been recommended. PURPOSE: In this phase II study, we attempted to determine the efficacy and toxicity of taxol in patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) non-small-cell lung cancer who had never received chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were not excluded because of prior surgery or because of radiotherapy administered more than 4 weeks before study entry. Taxol was administered in the hospital at a dose of 200 mg/m2 as an intravenous infusion over 24 hours and repeated every 3 weeks, provided that patients had recovered from any toxic effects. Dexamethasone, cimetidine, and diphenhydramine were given before chemotherapy to prevent hypersensitivity reactions. Therapy was continued for at least two courses unless there was rapid disease progression and for at least three courses if no change was observed and no grade 3 or 4 toxic effects occurred. Treatment was continued for six more courses after maximum response or for two more courses after complete remission but was discontinued if disease progressed. RESULTS: Of the 27 patients entered in the study, 25 were assessable for toxic effects and response. One patient had an allergic reaction that was not life threatening. The overall response rate was 24% (one complete response and five partial responses). An additional seven patients (28%) had minor response. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxic effect, and neutropenic fever occurred in eight of 118 courses. One additional patient developed neutropenic sepsis with hypotension but recovered with intensive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Taxol appears to have activity against non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. IMPLICATIONS: A phase II study combining taxol, etoposide, and cisplatin and using hematopoietic stimulating factors is now proposed. The optimal dose for combination chemotherapy has yet to be determined. An important consideration is potential cardiac effects of taxol with other drugs.

Stratified, randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous ondansetron administered as a multiple-dose regimen versus two single-dose regimens in the prevention of cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

PURPOSE: This study compares the efficacy and safety of two single-dose regimens with the approved three-dose regimen of ondansetron in the prevention of cisplatin-induced emesis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter study was a stratified, randomized, double-blind, and parallel group design. Chemotherapy-naive inpatients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC) 0.15 mg/kg times three doses, every 4 hours or a single 8-mg or 32-mg dose followed by two saline doses that began 30 minutes before cisplatin administration. Cisplatin (high-dose > or = 100 mg/m2 or medium-dose 50 to 70 mg/m2) was given as a single infusion (< or = 3 hours). Patients were monitored for emetic episodes, adverse events, and laboratory safety parameters for 24 hours after cisplatin administration. RESULTS: A total of 699 patients (359 high-dose, 340 medium-dose) were enrolled. Of these, 618 were assessable for efficacy (15 ineligible, 66 protocol deviations). The 32-mg dose was superior to the 8-mg single dose with regard to total number of emetic episodes (high-dose, P = .015; medium-dose, P < .001), complete response (no emetic episodes: high-dose, 48% v 35%; P = .048; medium-dose, 73% v 50%; P = .001) and failure rate (> 5 emetic episodes, withdrawn or rescued: high-dose, 20% v 34%; P = .018; medium-dose, 9% v 23%; P = .005). The 32-mg single dose was also superior to the 0.15 mg/kg times three dose regimen with regard to total number of emetic episodes (medium-dose, P = .033) and failure rate (high-dose, 20% v 36%; P = .009; medium-dose, 9% v 22%; P = .011). Ondansetron was well tolerated. The most common adverse event was headache. An approximate 10-fold increase in the incidence of clinically significant transaminase elevations was observed in the high-dose versus medium-dose cisplatin strata (aspartate aminotransferase [AST], 6.5% v 0.7%; serum alanine aminotransferase [ALT], 5.0% v 0.3%). CONCLUSION: A 32-mg single dose of ondansetron is more effective than a single 8-mg dose and is at least as effective as the standard regimen of 0.15 mg/kg times three doses in the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis.

Phase II study of combination therapy with high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Forty-six patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were treated with a combination of high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and mitomycin. Thirty-four patients (74%) had a performance status of 1, and 39 patients (85%) had adenocarcinoma. Of the 42 patients evaluable for response and toxicity, four achieved a partial response (10%); no patient achieved a complete response. Seven patients who had received prior chemotherapy showed no major response. The median survival of all 42 patients was 23 weeks. Myelosuppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity for this regimen, and 12 of 46 patients (26%) developed neutropenic fever requiring hospitalization and parenteral antibiotics. Of the 12 patients with severe neutropenic fever, one patient died because of toxicity. Nonhematologic toxicities, including azotemia, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, and hearing loss were transient and modest. We conclude that high-dose cisplatin combined with etoposide and mitomycin is a relatively toxic regimen with a low response rate. Further evaluation of the combination as given in this trial is not warranted.

Edatrexate improves the antitumor effects of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin against non-small cell lung cancer.

The authors treated 32 patients with Stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an outpatient regimen of edatrexate (10-ethyl-10-deaza-aminopterin) (10-EdAM) on days 1 and 8, cyclophosphamide on day 1, and cisplatin on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks with dose modification. The 22 men and 10 women (median age, 57 years of age) had no prior chemotherapy and a Zubrod performance status less than or equal to 2. A schedule with initial doses of 80 mg/m2, 800 mg/m2, and 80 mg/m2, respectively, yielded a 47% major response rate with two complete responses (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 70%), but it also yielded significant stomatitis and myelosuppression. A schedule with reduced starting doses (70 mg/m2, 700 mg/m2, and 70 mg/m2) was better tolerated, but dropped the major response rate to 27% with no complete responses (95% CI, 11% to 52%). Median survival time was 39 weeks for all 30 evaluable patients without a significant difference between the treatment groups (which were comparable in patient characteristics). Major response, however, was associated with longer survival time than minor response or no change (P = 0.024) or progressive disease (P = 0.001) (median survival times, 55, 39, and 27 weeks, respectively). When the doses delivered were compared, patients treated with the reduced dose schedule received less mean 10-EdAM per course (P = 0.01), although the doses of cyclophosphamide and cisplatin were comparable to the original dose schedule for the second course and thereafter. These results suggest that this three-drug regimen may have synergistic antitumor effects, with a steep dose-response relationship, particularly with 10-EdAM. With amelioration of the dose-limiting stomatitis of 10-EdAM, it seems possible to maximize the antitumor effects of this regimen.

A randomized double-blind study of gallium nitrate compared with etidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia.

Hypercalcemia is a major source of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Gallium nitrate and the bisphosphonate, etidronate, are new agents that have recently become available for treatment of this disorder. To directly compare therapeutic effectiveness, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of gallium nitrate compared with etidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. Gallium nitrate was administered by continuous intravenous (IV) infusion at a dose of 200 mg/m2/d. Etidronate was administered as a 4-hour IV infusion at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg. Both drugs were given daily for 5 consecutive days. Eligible patients had persistent moderate-to-severe hypercalcemia (total serum calcium [corrected for serum albumin] greater than or equal to 12.0 mg/dL) after 2 days of hospitalization and IV hydration. Seventy-one patients were randomized and treated. Twenty-eight of 34 patients (82%) who received gallium nitrate achieved normocalcemia compared with 16 of 37 patients (43%) who received etidronate (P less than .001). Patients who received etidronate required significantly greater amounts of IV fluids (P = .04) and more hypocalcemic drug treatment (P less than .05) during the poststudy period than patients who received gallium nitrate. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly longer median duration of normocalcemia for patients treated with gallium nitrate (8 days v 0 days, P = .0005). A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with gallium nitrate developed asymptomatic hypophosphatemia compared with patients treated with etidronate (97% v 43%, P less than .001). We conclude that gallium nitrate is highly effective and superior to etidronate for acute control of moderate-to-severe cancer-related hypercalcemia.