Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Surg ; 212(3): 426-32, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26924805

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Unplanned readmissions are costly to family satisfaction and negatively associated with quality of care. We hypothesized that patient, operative, and hospital factors would be associated with pediatric readmission. METHODS: All patients with an inpatient operation from 10/1/2008 to 7/28/2014 at a freestanding children's hospital were included. A retrospective cohort study using multivariable forward stepwise logistic regression determined factors associated with unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: Among 20,785 patients with an operation there were 26,978 encounters and 3,092 readmissions (11.5%). Thirteen of 33 candidate variables considered in the stepwise regression were significantly associated with readmission. Patients with an emergency department visit within 365 days of operation, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4 or greater, Hispanic ethnicity and late-day or holiday/weekend discharges were more likely to have an unplanned readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.76 to 2.19, OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.58 to 2.53, OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 1.04 to 1.29, OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.55 to 3.63. respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patient and hospital factors may be associated with readmission. Day and time of discharge represent variability of care and are important targets for hospital initiatives to decrease unplanned readmission.


Assuntos
Hospitais Pediátricos/estatística & dados numéricos , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/tendências , Masculino , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Washington/epidemiologia
2.
J Pediatr Urol ; 11(4): 228.e1-6, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26169487

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Value in healthcare is measured in terms of patient outcomes achieved per dollar expended. Outcomes and cost must be measured at the patient level to optimize value. Multidisciplinary clinics have been shown to be effective in providing coordinated and comprehensive care with improved outcomes, yet tend to have higher cost than typical clinics. We sought to lower individual patient cost and optimize value in a pediatric multidisciplinary reconstructive pelvic medicine (RPM) clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RPM clinic is a multidisciplinary clinic that takes care of patients with anomalies of the pelvic organs. The specialties involved include Urology, General Surgery, Gynecology, and Gastroenterology/Motility. From May 2012 to November 2014 we performed time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) analysis by measuring provider time for each step in the patient flow. Using observed time and the estimated hourly cost of each of the providers we calculated the final cost at the individual patient level, targeting clinic preparation. We utilized Toyota Kata methodology to enhance operational efficiency in an effort to optimize value. Variables measured included cost, time to perform a task, number of patients seen in clinic, percent value-added time (VAT) to patients (face to face time) and family experience scores (FES). RESULTS: At the beginning of the study period, clinic costs were $619 per patient. We reduced conference time from 6 min/patient to 1 min per patient, physician preparation time from 8 min to 6 min and increased Medical Assistant (MA) preparation time from 9.5 min to 20 min, achieving a cost reduction of 41% to $366 per patient. Continued improvements further reduced the MA preparation time to 14 min and the MD preparation time to 5 min with a further cost reduction to $194 (69%) (Figure). During this study period, we increased the number of appointments per clinic. We demonstrated sustained improvement in FES with regards to the families overall experience with their providers. Value added time was increased from 60% to 78% but this was not significant. CONCLUSION: Time-based cost analysis effectively measures individualized patient cost. We achieved a 69% reduction in clinic preparation costs. Despite this reduction in costs, we were able to maintain VAT and sustain improvements in family experience. In caring for complex patients, lean management methodology enables optimization of value in a multidisciplinary clinic.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Anormalidades Urogenitais/terapia , Urologia/economia , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , Anormalidades Urogenitais/economia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...