Frailty and Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship among frailty index, hearing measures, and hearing-related quality of life (QOL) in older recipients of cochlear implants. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Academic medical center. METHODS: Adults aged ≥65 years at the time of receiving cochlear implants between July 13, 2000, and April 3, 2019, were asked to complete a questionnaire on hearing-related QOL. Chart review was performed to identify patients' characteristics. Correlations were calculated between frailty index and audiologic outcome measures as well as between speech recognition scores and QOL scores. Linear regression models were developed to examine the impact of clinical characteristics, frailty index, and hearing measures on hearing-related QOL. RESULTS: Data for 143 respondents were included. The mean age was 80.7 years (SD, 7.1), with a mean 27.8 years of hearing loss (SD, 17.4) before implantation. The mean frailty index was 11.1 (SD, 10.6), indicating that patients had 1 or 2 of the measured comorbidities on average. No correlation was found between lower frailty index (better health) and hearing scores, including pure tone averages (PTAs) and speech recognition scores. Lower frailty index and larger improvement in PTA after cochlear implantation predicted better QOL scores on univariate analysis (respectively, P = .002, ß = -0.42 [95% CI, -0.68 to -0.16]; P = .008, ß = -0.15 [95% CI, -0.26 to -0.04]) and multivariate analysis (P = .047, ß = -0.28 [95% CI, -0.55 to -0.01]; P = .006, ß = -0.16 [95% CI, -0.28 to -0.05]). No speech recognition scores correlated with QOL after cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Frailty index does not correlate with hearing scores after cochlear implantation in older adults. Lower frailty index and more improvement in PTA predict better QOL scores after cochlear implantation in older adults.

Caregiver Quality of Life After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors affecting quality of life (QOL) in caregivers of older cochlear implant (CI) recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults over age 65 receiving CI between July 13, 2000 and April 3, 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Linear regression models for caregiver QOL measured by Significant Other Scale for Hearing Disability (SOS-HEAR), with independent variables: caregiver role, patient gender, 11 factor modified frailty index (mFI), duration of hearing loss, hearing aid use, age at surgery, time since surgery, change in pure tone average (PTA), processor input type and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ). Correlations between SOS-HEAR and patient speech recognition scores. RESULTS: Questionnaires were mailed to all 294 living CI recipients. Seventy-one caregivers completed the questionnaire. Only patient gender and mFi were significant predictors of caregiver QOL on both univariate (p ≤ 0.001, ß= -20.26 [95% confidence interval -30.21, -10.3]; 0.005, -0.72 [-1.20, -0.23], respectively) and multivariate (p = 0.005, ß = -20.09, -33.05 to -7.13; 0.003, -0.93 [-1.50, -0.37]) analysis, where caregivers of female patients with lower mFI (better health) had better QOL scores. Caregiver QOL was significantly associated with patient's change in PTA and self-reported QOL scores on univariate (p = 0.041, ß = 0.52 [0.08, 0.96]; 0.024, -0.27 [-0.52, -0.02]) but not multivariate analysis. Time since CI was significant only on multivariate analysis (0.041, -0.17 [-0.33, -0.01]). Caregiver QOL did not correlate with patient speech recognition scores. CONCLUSIONS: Higher QOL scores were found among caregivers of healthier, female CI recipients. Patient hearing measurements did not correspond with better caregiver QOL.