[National meetings for complex cases in pediatric radiation oncology: Back on six years experience]. / Réunions nationales de cas complexes en radiothérapie pédiatrique : retour sur six années d'expérience.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric cancers are rare, representing almost 2,500 new cases each year in France meaning 1% of all cancers. Since 2012, a twice-monthly national web-based conference was held in France. Any patient with a pediatric type cancer requiring radiotherapy can be discussed. It aims at answering the physician with specific radiation therapy questions on rare and complex indications, at promoting the use of referential and the inclusion into clinical protocols. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2018, 1,078 cases were discussed for 940 patients in 142 meetings. Mean age was 10 years old (4 months to 45 years). The mean number of attendants was 6 (2 to 32). We review in this paper the main clinical features discussed in the web-conference and the decision of the web-conference. In 85% cases, the first treatment proposed was mostly accepted, but in 15%, other proposals were done (modifications of target volumes, doses or indications). CONCLUSIONS: Between 2012 and 2018, more than 1,000 pediatric irradiation cases were discussed in our web-based conference leading to 15% of change in radiation protocol. The rarity and the complexity of these situations need those meetings. They provide a place to improve the global knowledge and the quality of the treatments provided.

[Home-based zoledronic acid infusion therapy in patients with solid tumours: compliance and patient-nurse satisfaction]. / Traitement à domicile par l'acide zolédronique chez des patients atteints de tumeurs solides : observance et satisfaction du patient et de l'infirmier.

PURPOSE: To explore patient and nurse satisfaction, compliance with best practice, technical feasibility and safety of home infusion of a bisphosphonate. METHODS: Prospective 1-year survey of home zoledronic acid therapy (4 mg, 15-min intravenous, every three to four weeks) in patients with bone metastases secondary to a solid malignancy. A physician questionnaire, nurse satisfaction/feasibility questionnaire and patient satisfaction questionnaire were administered. RESULTS: Physician participation rate: 56.5% (87/154); 818 patients included; 381 predominantly community nurses; 763/788 case report forms meeting inclusion criteria. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: median age, 68 years (30-95); M/F, 40/60; ECOG-PS 0 or 1, 78.6%; primary tumour site: breast (55.2%), prostate (28.4%), lung (7.2%), other (9.4%). Nurse satisfaction rates: 90.9% (organization of home ZOL therapy); 96.7% (ease of infusion); 97.5% (patient-nurse relationship); 73% (relationship with hospital staff). Patient satisfaction rates: 95.3% overall; 57.6% (quality of the nurse-patient relationship); 68.8% (less travel/waiting); 52.9% (consideration for home environment). Treatment tolerance: 33.63% (discontinuation due to adverse events); 0.6% (osteonecrosis of the jaw); 0.2% fractures. Practitioner compliance with best practice: 76.7% to 83.7% (recommended and/or tolerated dosage), 73% (dental hygiene checks at inclusion; 48 to 56% thereafter); 66% (pre-infusion hydration); often undocumented for calcium/vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSION: Home zoledronic acid treatment was well tolerated. There was a very high level of both patient and nurse satisfaction with home therapy. However, better compliance with best practice should be encouraged.

Home-based zoledronic acid infusion therapy in patients with solid tumours: compliance and patient-nurse satisfaction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore patient and nurse satisfaction, compliance with best practice, technical feasibility and safety of home infusion of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (ZOL). METHODS: This was a prospective 1-year survey of home ZOL therapy (4 mg Zometa, 15-min i.v., every 3-4 weeks) in patients with bone metastases secondary to a solid malignancy. A physician questionnaire, nurse satisfaction/feasibility questionnaire and patient satisfaction questionnaire were administered at several time-points. RESULTS: Physician participation rate was 56.5% (87/154). Physicians enrolled 818 patients visited by 381 predominantly community nurses. Of the 788 case report forms received, 763 met inclusion criteria. Patient characteristics were as follows: median age, 68 years (30-95); M/F, 40/60; ECOG-PS 0 or 1, 78.6%; and primary tumour site, breast (55.2%), prostate (28.4%), lung (7.2%) or other (9.4%). Nurse satisfaction rates were high: organisation of home ZOL therapy, 90.9%; ease of infusion, 96.7%; patient-nurse relationship, 97.5%; and relationship with hospital staff, 73%. Patient satisfaction was also very high (95.3%). The main reasons were quality of the nurse-patient relationship (57.6%), less travel/waiting (68.8%), home environment (52.9%) and less disruption to daily routine (36.6%). ZOL therapy was well tolerated, the discontinuation rate due to adverse events (including deaths whether related to diseases progression or not) was 33.6%. The incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw was 0.6% and of fractures, 0.2%. Practitioner compliance with best practice was 76.7-83.7% for recommended and/or tolerated dosage, 73% for dental hygiene checks at inclusion and 48-56% thereafter, 66% for pre-infusion hydration, and often undocumented for calcium/vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Home ZOL therapy was well tolerated. Both patient and nurse satisfaction were very high. However, better compliance with best practice should be encouraged.

Response of endothelial cells to a dual tyrosine kinase receptor inhibition combined with irradiation.

Recent studies suggest the possibility of a direct antiangiogenic effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drugs due to the presence of EGFR on endothelial cells. The aim of this study was to analyze the direct effect on endothelial cells of associating EGFR targeting, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 targeting, and irradiation. We examined both the cytotoxic effects and the effect on molecular markers resulting from the combined action of gefitinib (Iressa; anti-EGFR), ZM317450 [VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VTKI); anti-VEGFR-2], and irradiation (radiation therapy) on HMME7 cells, an immortalized microvascular endothelial cell of human origin. The presence of a functional EGFR pathway sensitive to gefitinib was shown in HMME7 cells (gefitinib-induced decrease in phospho-EGFR, phospho-p42/p44, and phospho-Akt). The stimulation of VEGFR-2 pathway led to an increase in Akt phosphorylation that was inhibited by VTKI. Of note, a post-radiation therapy induction of phospho-p42/p44 was observed on HMME7 cells, and this effect was inhibited by a pretreatment with gefitinib. Based on combination indexes (Chou and Talalay analyses), the associations gefitinib-radiation therapy, VTKI-radiation therapy, VTKI-gefitinib, and gefitinib-VTKI-radiation therapy were found to be additive, slightly synergistic, and markedly synergistic, respectively, for the cytotoxicity on HMME7 cells. Among molecular explanatory factors that were examined, the combination gefitinib-radiation therapy totally abolishes DNA-dependent protein kinase expression, and gefitinib attenuates the radiation therapy-induced enhancement of ERCC1 and augments the VTKI-induced CD95 enhancement. The existence of a radiation therapy-dependent neoangiogenesis may be related to the induction of EGFR pathway in endothelial cells, a phenomenon that can be attenuated by anti-EGFR drugs like gefitinib. In complement to the direct antitumor effects of radiation therapy and anti-EGFR drugs, a strong antiangiogenic effect may be obtained with therapeutic strategies combining radiation therapy with EGFR and VEGFR-2 targeting agents.