Clinical prioritisation of revision knee surgical procedures: BASK working group consensus document.

BACKGROUND: Elective orthopaedic surgery during the Covid-19 pandemic requires careful case prioritisation. We aimed to produce consensus-based guidelines on the prioritisation of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures. METHOD: Twenty-three revision TKA scenarios were assigned priority (NHS England/Royal College of Surgeons scale) by the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Revision Knee Working Group (n = 24). Consensus agreement was defined as ≥70% respondents (18/24) giving the same prioritisation. Two voting rounds were undertaken; procedures achieving <70% agreement were given their most commonly assigned priority. RESULTS: 18/23 procedures achieved ≥70% agreement. Three were P1a (surgery within <24 h); DAIR for sepsis, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) fixation and PPF-revision TKA. Three were P1b (<72 h); debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) for a stable patient, flap coverage for an open knee, and acute extensor mechanism rupture. Eight were P2 (<4 weeks), including aseptic loosening at risk of collapse, inter-stage patients with poor functioning spacers. Five were P3 (<3 months), including second stage revision for infection, revision for instability with limited mobility. Four were P4 (can wait >3 months) e.g. aseptic loosening. CONCLUSION: Sepsis and PPF surgery are the most urgent procedures. Although most procedures should be undertaken within one to three months (P2/3), these cases represent a small revision practice volume; P4 cases (e.g. aseptic loosening without risk of collapse) make up most surgeons' caseload. These recommendations are a guideline; patient co-morbidities, Covid-19 pathways, availability of support services and multi-disciplinary team discussion within the regional revision network will dictate prioritisation.

Fasciotomy for chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the leg: clinical outcome in a large retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) is an overuse disorder typically affecting an athletic population. CECS is a diagnosis based on history and intracompartmental pressure (ICP) testing. CECS patients can be treated surgically by fasciotomy; however, research on the relationship between ICP and patient symptoms and also between ICP and patient-reported outcome post-fasciotomy is limited. This study aims to (1) assess functional outcome and patient satisfaction post-fasciotomy and (2) identify any potential correlation between ICP and reported levels of pain. METHODS: 138 CECS patients who had ICP measurements and subsequently underwent fasciotomy were identified from our regional service for exercise-induced lower limb extremity pain between January 2000 and March 2017. Clinical outcomes were recorded at the time of ICP testing and in the post-operative follow-up clinic. Pain was reported using a verbal rating scale (VRS) ('low', 'moderate' or 'high') or as a visual analogue score (VAS) 0-10 (0 = least painful, 10 = most painful). Spearman's ranked correlation test was used to calculate correlation between ICP and reported pain. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were eligible for inclusion in this study (mean age 29.7 ± 9.7 years, 110 M, 28 F) of which 109 patients (VRS n = 61, VAS n = 48) reported pain level at pre- and post-operative stages. Mean pre-operative VAS score was 8.52 ± 0.71, and decreased to 0.77 ± 0.69 post-operatively. An insignificant positive correlation (r = 0.046, two-tailed p = 0.76) was found between VAS pain and ICP. A significant moderate positive correlation (r = 0.497, two-tailed p = 0.01) was found between VRS pain and ICP. CONCLUSION: Fasciotomy significantly reduces pain and increases activity levels in CECS patients. ICP was found to positively correlate with patient-reported pain.

Bristol index of patellar width to thickness (BIPWiT): a reproducible measure of patellar thickness from adult MRI.

BACKGROUND: The restoration of an adequate patellar thickness is a key to the successful outcome of knee arthroplasty. This study investigated the relationship between the thickness of the native patellar and medial-lateral patellar width using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: 75 MRI scans of young adults, with an average age of 27 (range 16-40) were studied. Exclusion criteria included a diagnosis of degenerative joint disease, patello-femoral pathology or age under 16/over 40 (170 patients). The bony thickness of the patellar, the chondral thickness and patellar width were measured, as was the location of maximal patellar thickness. Inter/intraobserver variability was calculated and correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between patellar width and thickness (bone plus cartilage) (Pearson 0.75, P<0.001). The mean width to thickness ratio was 1.8:1 (standard deviation 0.1, 95% confidence interval 1.78-1.83). Without cartilage the ratio was 2.16:1 (SD 0.15, 95% CI 2.11-2.21), correlation was moderate (Pearson 0.59, P<0.001). The average maximal patellar cartilage thickness was 4.1mm (SD 1.3). CONCLUSION: The strong correlation and narrow confidence intervals for the ratio of patellar width to thickness, suggest that patellar width might be used as a guide for accurate restoration of patellar thickness during total knee or patello-femoral replacement. After removing osteophytes we would recommend a ratio of 1.8:1. Further work is required to establish whether there is a relationship between anterior knee pain post total knee arthroplasty and an abnormal patellar width:thickness ratio. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The incidence and reporting rates of needle-stick injury amongst UK surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Needle-stick injuries are common. Such accidents are associated with a small, but significant, risk to our career, health, families and not least our patients. National guidelines steer institution-specific strategies to provide a consistent and safe method of dealing with such incidents. Surgeon-specific guidelines are not currently available. We have observed that hospital sharps policy is often considered cumbersome to the surgeon, resulting in on-the-spot decision making with potential long-term implications. By their essence, these decisions are inconsistent, not reproducible and, thus, we believe them to be unsafe. The under-reporting to occupational health departments is well documented. Current surgical practice has the potential to expose the surgeon to unnecessary risk. The aims of this study were to establish the true incidence of contaminations caused by needle-stick injury in our hospital and to assess how well current protocols are really implemented. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We identified all surgeons of consultant, non-career staff grade (NCSG) and registrar grade working in a large 687-bed district general hospital serving a population of 550,000, in the UK. We designed a retrospective, anonymous 30-second survey. Surgeons' awareness and opinion of local policy was sought in a free-text section. RESULTS: Of the 98 surgeons in the hospital, 77% responded to the questionnaire and 44% anonymously admitted to having a needle-stick injury. Only 3 of the 33 (9%) who sustained an needle-stick injury said that they followed the agreed local policy. Twenty-three surgeons (70%) performed first aid type procedures such as informing scrub nurse, changing needle and gloves. Seven surgeons (21%) simply ignored the incident and continued. Forty-three surgeons commented on the policy's nature with only 9 who regarded it as 'user friendly'. CONCLUSIONS: Needle-stick injury is still a common problem, particularly in the surgical cohort and remains significantly under-reported. The disparity between hospital sharps policy and actual surgical practice is considered and an explanation for the difference sought. Without this awareness of 'real-life' surgical practice, the occupational health figures for sharps injury will always tell a rosy story under-estimating a real problem. We strongly advocate universal precautions in the operating theatre. However, we acknowledge that sharps injuries will occur. We should remain vigilant and act upon contaminations without surgical bravado but with mater-of-fact professionalism. This includes regular review of policy and, particularly, promotion of surgical awareness.

Osteochondritis dissecans of the knee; long-term clinical outcome following arthroscopic debridement.

We reviewed 32 knees in 26 patients who had previously undergone arthroscopic debridement for symptomatic osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the knee. The patients were followed up at a minimum of 11 years following surgery and were evaluated clinically using the American Knee Society Clinical Rating Score. Additional evaluation was performed using the Hughston Scale to include radiographic assessment. The mean American Knee Society Score was 179 (out of 200), indicating good clinical function. Radiographically, however, only 29% scored excellent or good on the Hughston Scale. Younger patients with a small, stable (and therefore preserved), medial femoral condyle lesion had the best prognosis. Whilst more novel and complex options such as chondrocyte implantation are being assessed for the treatment of OCD, it is clear that within this study group careful debridement with removal of loose tissue can achieve good clinical results in the long term. There was however radiographic evidence of early degenerative joint disease in 17/24 (71%) of patients reviewed. Patients undergoing excision of OCD fragments did worse than those in whom the fragment was preserved, however the risk of further surgery is raised if a fragment is left in situ at initial surgery.

A simple clinical test of flexor pollicis longus rupture.

Rupture of the tendon of flexor pollicis longus is suspected when active flexion of the interphalangeal joint of the thumb is not possible. This can be a result of trauma but, when spontaneous, diagnostic confusion can exist as incomplete palsy of the anterior interosseous nerve can present in a similar way. We describe a simple clinical sign which can differentiate between these conditions.

The use of digital X-ray radiogrammetry and peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in patients attending fracture clinic after distal forearm fracture.

Despite the fact that 50% of postmenopausal women with Colles' fracture have evidence of osteoporosis, the vast majority of women with forearm fractures are neither investigated nor treated for osteoporosis. Digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) provides an attractive option in patients with distal forearm fracture, as it requires no additional X-rays over and above those performed as part of clinical management. We have compared DXR analysis of nonstandardised plain films taken routinely in accident and emergency with peripheral dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (pDXA) in a group presenting with distal forearm fracture. Women presenting with a fracture of the distal forearm underwent pDXA measurements of the calcaneus. Plain X-rays performed at the time of presentation were taken to allow adequate fracture treatment. No additional radiographer training or standardisation of films was performed. The DXR technique relies upon visualisation of the metacarpal shafts and this was not visualised on 123 of 201 (61%) films. The AP plain film was thus assessed using DXR for BMD in the remaining 78 patients with a mean age of 70.6 years (SE = 1.3). Mean BMD for DXR was 0.46 g/cm2 (SE = 0.01) and for pDXA was 0.40 g/cm2 (SE = 0.01). The correlation between BMD measured using the two techniques was 0.55 (P < 0.001). Although DXR measurements could not be performed in all patients, this proportion could easily be increased by routinely including the metacarpal shaft region in X-rays obtained after suspected distal forearm fracture. The correlation between the pDXA and DXR results is comparable with those reported between DXA measurements at the forearm, spine and hip. Our study suggests that DXR may provide a feasible method for the assessment of future fracture risk. The potential advantage of DXR over calcaneal pDXA measurements is that standard forearm X-ray obtained as part of fracture management could be used.