The IRIS clinic: A Protocol for a mixed-methods study evaluating the management of Hyperemesis Gravidarum.

Background: Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy that affects 0.3-3% of women and has profound nutritional, physical and psychological consequences. Research is lacking regarding the most effective management of the condition. In response to patient feedback, a multidisciplinary HG day-case service (IRIS Clinic) was launched in 2020 at The National Maternity Hospital, Ireland. The clinic provides routine, day-case care in a comfortable space with pre-booked appointments. The MDT involves midwives, dietitians, perinatal mental health, obstetrics and pharmacy, and the nature of the clinic enables peer-to-peer support. As this clinic is the first of its kind in Ireland, we aim to assess its effectiveness and feasibility, and suggest recommendations for improvement. Methods: This is a sequential, mixed-methods study that commenced in August 2021. The prospective arm of the study is ongoing and involves enrolling women (n = 50) who are attending the IRIS clinic. Data are collected on first admission (pre-intervention) and approximately 8 weeks' later (post-intervention) relating to symptoms of HG, well-being, food tolerances, quality of life and nutritional intake. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews will be conducted to evaluate women's experiences of attending the clinic. The retrospective arm of the study will be a chart review (n = 200) of women diagnosed with HG to describe assessments, treatments and pregnancy and birth outcomes. Conclusion: The IRIS clinic has the potential to improve pregnancy outcomes and nutritional status among women with HG. If found to be effective and feasible, the model for this clinic could be replicated elsewhere.

Women's experiences of Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) and of attending a dedicated multi-disciplinary hydration clinic.

PROBLEM: Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a severe form of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy that affects 1-3 % of women and has profound nutritional, physical and psychological consequences. Previous research identified that women with HG report inadequate infrastructure for day case management. INTRODUCTION: A multi-disciplinary HG day case service (IRIS Hydration Clinic) was launched and provides routine care for women with HG in a dedicated unit. The multi-disciplinary team involves midwives, dietitians, obstetricians and perinatal mental health. AIMS: To explore women's experiences of HG and of attending the dedicated clinic. METHODS: Ten interviews were conducted with women who attended the clinic. Data were transcribed and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. FINDINGS: The physical and psychological impact of HG was captured. The appreciation for the dedicated clinic was a common theme, regarding having somewhere specific for treatment rather than ad-hoc treatment. 'Relationships' was a significant theme - women described the benefits of continuity of care and the positive impact of peer support. Areas for improvement were explored, such as expansion and extra sensitivity around some women's issues around weight gain/loss. DISCUSSION: HG causes significant ill-health and its impact remains undervalued. Women had highly positive experiences of attending the dedicated HG clinic. The impact of continuity and individualized care in a day-case setting improved women's experiences of this condition. CONCLUSION: The dedicated HG clinic was highly valued by women experiencing the condition. The IRIS clinic provides much-needed validation for a medical condition with little understanding from the general public or many healthcare professionals.

The far-reaching burden of Hyperemesis Gravidarum - an exploration of women's experiences and perceptions of healthcare support.

Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a rare condition of pregnancy that exerts a profound effect on a woman's physical and psychological health, but limited research regarding women's perceptions of healthcare for this condition exists. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the personal and healthcare experiences of women with HG. Eligible participants included women who had experienced HG in a current or recent pregnancy and were referred to the dietitian at the National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Suitable women were invited to participate by letter, with a follow-up phone call to confirm eligibility. Four semi-structured focus groups were conducted (n = 11). Audio recordings were transcribed and data was thematically analyzed using an inductive, data-driven approach. Participants emphasized the psychological hardship of HG, which manifested in many different ways, and unveiled the far-reaching burden of HG. Women advocated for a dedicated service for HG and the need for increased knowledge, understanding and support for HG, in order to ensure optimal HG management and woman-centered care. Women also highlighted the need for obvious clinical leadership of HG and a continuum of care throughout pregnancy and post-partum. Improvements to the day ward setting and access to HG-specific mental health support would be welcomed. At a government level, timely resolution of the financial assistance for first-line anti-emetics is needed. Overall, greater awareness and understanding of the condition is needed to improve support from family, friends and colleagues. Further research is warranted to determine whether these recommendations would result in improved pregnancy outcomes.