Application of the glucose hydrogen breath test for the detection of bacterial overgrowth in patients with cystic fibrosis--a reliable method?

Patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) have recently been deemed highly susceptible for bacterial intestinal overgrowth (BIO). We aimed to define the prevalence of BIO in children with CF by applying the H(2)-glucose breath test. Forty children with CF and ten healthy children received 1 g/kg D-glucose orally. Breath samples for H(2) content (ppm) were collected for 3 h. BIO was suspected if the breath hydrogen content increased by more than 20 ppm or if baseline concentrations topped 20 ppm. In 27 of 40 CF children (68%), breath hydrogen content exceeded 20 ppm. Whereas the breath hydrogen exhalation persisted above 20 ppm in almost all these children throughout the sampling period, none of the remaining children increased above this threshold. The high rate of CF children with elevated fasting hydrogen breath concentrations indicates that this phenomenon is less a sign of BIO rather than a consequence of global malabsorption and intestinal dysmotility.

Does secretin-stimulated MRCP predict exocrine pancreatic insufficiency?: A comparison with noninvasive exocrine pancreatic function tests.

BACKGROUND: Data on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with secretin stimulation (S-MRCP) for the assessment of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) are limited. We compared pancreatic function tests with the findings of S-MRCP in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) and disease controls. METHODS: S-MRCP was performed in 23 patients (18 CP, 5 disease controls). MRCP images were analyzed for secretin-induced duodenal liquid filling (0=no filling; 1=duodenal bulb; 2=up to lower flexure; 3=beyond lower flexure). EPI was evaluated by fecal elastase, fecal fat concentration, and a 13C mixed chain triglyceride breath test. Clinically relevant EPI was stated if 2 of 3 tests were pathologic. RESULTS: EPI was diagnosed in 10 of 18 patients with CP. Patients without EPI showed either grade 2 (n=4) or grade 3 (n=9) duodenal filling, whereas only 1/10 patients with EPI showed grade 3 duodenal filling. Sensitivity and specificity of S-MRCP for the diagnosis of EPI were 69% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of duodenal filling should be performed in patients who undergo S-MRCP for the evaluation of pancreatic morphology. However, minor degrees of duodenal filling are equivocal and require further diagnostic evaluation.