Prostate cancer among Saudis: a registry review.

Background: Policy makers in Saudi Arabia greatly rely on published studies to make major public health decisions. Prostate cancer (PCa) studies in Saudi Arabia are either outdated or limited to local regions. Aim: The authors aim to analyze the Saudi Cancer Registry to determine the incidence of PCa across all regions of the Kingdom and the risk factors of poor prognosis in the population. Methods: Patients diagnosed with primary PCa from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017 were included in the study from the Saudi Cancer Registry. Incidence rates and risk factors for poor survival were calculated. Results: A total of 3607 PCa patients were retrieved. PCa incidence rates ranged from 0.2 to 1.4 per 100 000. Most of the patients were aged 60 and older (86.5%; n=3120), married (97%; n=3497) and lived in the central region (38.1%; n=1375). The mean age at diagnosis was 71.1 (10.8) years. Over half of all tumors were poorly differentiated (64.2%; n=2317), and localized (60.4%; n=2180). The all-time metastasis rate reached 31.4% (n=1131). The lowest mean survival was in those with distant metastasis (P=0.039). Age groups, marital status, tumor morphology, place of residency, and grade were not proven to significantly influence survival. Conclusion: The high metastasis rate and evidence of a greater incidence of newly diagnosed metastatic PCa indicate that the idea of select screening for certain high-risk populations is not farfetched. The authors encourage the promotion of awareness regarding PCa risk factors and screening to optimize prognosis and minimize late presentations and high metastasis rates.

Beyond the norm: exploring the uncommon squamous cell carcinoma of the prostate using a Saudi tumor registry.

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the prostate has limited treatment choices and portends a dismal prognosis with an average survival time of ~14-months. This study provides a descriptive overview of SCC of the prostate in Saudi Arabia. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with prostatic SCC between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017. Information on demographic and tumor characteristics and the survival of patients was collected from the Saudi Cancer Registry. Survival was depicted through Kaplan-Meier plots. Fisher's exact test was used to assess the association between categorical variables and death, while a Wilcoxon rank sum test was applied for numerical variables. Results: Out of a larger subset of 3607 patients, 16 patients were diagnosed with prostatic SCC, of which half resided in the Central region (50.0%) and most (81.2%) were aged greater than or equal to 60 years. Most patients (62.6%) had poorly differentiated (grade III, 43.8%) lesions, and 50% of cases were metastatic at diagnosis. 62.5% of patients died, all residing in the Eastern and Central regions. Regional extension (75.0%) and distant metastasis (87.5%) were significantly associated with death compared to localized lesions (0.0%) (P=0.022). The 5-year survival rate in our study was 33%. Conclusion: The present study is the first to describe the characteristics of prostatic SCC in Saudi Arabia. Our results are consistent with prior studies showing that prostatic SCC is often high-grade and metastatic at diagnosis, conferring a poor prognosis.

Prostatic adenocarcinoma with transitional cell features among the Saudi Arabian population: a registry review.

Prostate cancer is the third leading cause of death from cancer among American men. Acinar adenocarcinoma is the most common form of prostate cancer; however, there are several nonacinar adenocarcinoma variants, such as transitional cell carcinoma of the prostate and ductal adenocarcinoma. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on all Saudi patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate with transitional cell features. The data was collected from the Saudi Cancer Registry, which collects tumor data from all private, military, and Health Ministry hospitals in Saudi Arabia through five regional offices. Results: Out of 3608 patients, only 16 (0.44%) had adenocarcinoma with transitional cell features. All the tumors under investigation were malignant and constituted. Only 6.2% of the tumors were well-differentiated, 43.8% were moderately differentiated, and 50.0% were poorly differentiated. Among the included patients, 56.3% of the patients (n=9) died. There were no significant factors associated with death among patients, including the demographic and tumor-related variables. Conclusion: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study describing the prevalence of adenocarcinoma with transitional cell features and its characteristics in Saudi Arabia. The authors have demonstrated that this rare subtype may be more prevalent than what was originally believed. It is necessary for future studies to assess the effectiveness of various treatment modalities to combat it. Furthermore, identifying risk factors - if any - may be crucial in the prevention of its development among men worldwide.

Rare tumours of the bladder: A Saudi registry based descriptive study.

Objective: There is limited literature focusing on the characteristics and behaviours of bladder tumours outside of the common three morphologies, that is, urothelial carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma. The presented study provides a descriptive analysis of rare bladder tumours in KSA. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with a primary rare bladder tumour between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017. The data were acquired from the Saudi Tumour Registry. Frequencies and percentages were then generated for the categorical variables, while means and standard deviations were calculated for quantitative variables. Results: The study included 65 patients. The majority (n = 35, 53.8%) were aged 60 years and older. The patients were predominantly male (n = 53, 81.5%) and the majority lived in the Western region (n = 26, 40.?%). The most diagnosed tumour morphologies were small cell carcinoma in adults (n = 11, 16.9%) and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma in children (n = 14, 21.5%), with the dominant diagnosis method being histology of primary tumour in 98.5% of the patients. Most tumours were localised (n = 30, 46.2%) and multifocal (n = 34, 52.3%). The overall mortality rate was 24.6%, with an overall diagnosis to death interval of 1.14 ± 0.75 years wherein small cell carcinoma was the shortest (0.84 ± 0.24) days. Conclusion: There remains a gap in the literature regarding uncommon urologic tumours. Shedding light on these factors will aid in further understanding the patterns of tumour behaviour in the region. This will facilitate enhanced risk-and response-based screening strategies and more favourable outcomes. Additionally, formulating a global registry for such patients is recommended.

A 10-Year Tertiary Care Center Experience With Adrenalectomies for Adrenal Tumors.

Background Due to limited data, our understanding of the trends and outcomes of adrenalectomy in the Saudi surgical practice is limited and insufficient. The aim of this study was to review the clinical data regarding the diagnosis and management of patients with adrenal masses and to assess the effect of surgeon specialty on the outcomes. Materials and methods The study included all adult patients who underwent an adrenalectomy for tumors from 2011 to 2021. The patient characteristics, tumor profile, and preoperative, perioperative, and post-operative variables were collected. Frequency and percentage were generated for the categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation were generated for the quantitative variables. Results A total of 55 patients were identified. Most of the patients had a well-defined (58.2%, n = 32), benign (85.5%, n = 47) mass located in the cortex (58.2% n = 32). The majority of the sample were asymptomatic (52.7%, n = 29), and the most frequent diagnosis was adrenal adenoma (47.27%, n = 26). The most frequent indication for surgery was tumor functionality (69.1%, n = 38). Surgeries were mostly laparoscopic (69.1% n = 38) and performed by a urologist (52.7%). The conversion to open surgery was 13%, the intraoperative complication rate was 9.1%, the post-operative complication rate was 7.3%, and the 30-day readmission rate was 3.6%. Intraoperative complications, post-operative complications, and conversion to open surgery were more frequent among general surgeons, while 30-day readmissions were more frequent among urologists. However, a statistically accurate association could not be found due to the small population size. Conclusion Open surgery was replaced by laparoscopic adrenalectomy as the surgery of choice for different adrenal pathologies. The findings reported in this study are substantiated by current literature, adding to our comprehension of adrenal tumor presentation. There are, however, some inconsistencies regarding the influence of gender on tumor development and the association between surgeon specialty and outcome in the literature that merit research. However, evidence regarding the contribution of comorbidities, such as hypertension, diabetes, and hypothyroidism, is lacking.

Bladder cancer in Saudi Arabia: a registry-based nationwide descriptive epidemiological and survival analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the risk factors, prevalence, incidence rate, and age distribution of bladder cancer (BC) in Saudi Arabia is insufficient due to limited data. OBJECTIVE: Describe the epidemiology and analyze factors associated with survival in patients with BC in Saudi Arabia. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTINGS: Registry-based nationwide study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included all records in the Saudi Cancer Registry of patients diagnosed with a primary BC from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. Collected data included year of diagnosis, gender, age, marital status, region and nationality, tumor site of origin, tumor histological subtype, tumor behavior, tumor grade, tumor extent, tumor laterality, the basis of the diagnosis, and survival status. Factors predicting survival were tested by a Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality status on last contact. SAMPLE SIZE: 3750 patients. RESULTS: The overall incidence of BC was 1.4 per 100 000 persons. Significant differences in the distribution of survival were observed by age, gender, nationality, place of residency, tumor morphology, tumor grade and extension. The adjusted predictors of decreased survival were age, squamous cell carcinoma, Grade III and IV bladder tumors, regional direct extension, regional lymph node extension, combined regional lymph node and direct extension, and distant metastasis. Male gender and being widowed were predictors of improved survival in the unadjusted analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides further understanding of BC in a region with a high prevalence of risk factorsuch as smoking. Highlighting these factors, specifically in Saudi Arabia, improves evidence-based practice in this region and may facilitate appropriate care to optimize outcomes. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and underreporting. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Toward Prostate Cancer and Its Screening Methods Among Primary Care Patients in King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Aim The aim of the study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practice toward prostate cancer and its screening methods among patients attending primary care facilities in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted on a random sample of 385 men. The questionnaire was distributed using a non-random sampling method (convenience sampling) that included 13 questions that assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of adult male patients toward prostate cancer and its screening methods. The questions were divided into three general questions that test the knowledge, four questions that analyze patients' opinions (attitude), and six questions on how patients are practicing screening methods with questions three and six being dependent on the answers to the questions that come before them. Results Around 64% of the participants had adequate knowledge about prostate cancer. Respondents with higher socioeconomic status demonstrated a higher level of knowledge about prostate cancer than the other groups. Regarding the attitude, more than 70% of the respondents believed that it is very important to screen for prostate cancer. About 23% of the participants had done some form of prostate screening test either prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or digital rectal exam (DRE); most of them were men older than 50 years. Conclusions The majority of the respondents to our survey demonstrated high general knowledge about prostate cancer. However, practice toward prostate screening methods was significantly low regardless of the positive attitude on the importance of screening. More data should be obtained to investigate the potential multifactorial reasons for such a low practice.