A Baker's Dozen of Top Antimicrobial Stewardship Intervention Publications in 2020.

The number of articles related to antimicrobial stewardship published each year has increased significantly over the last decade. Keeping up with the literature, particularly the most innovative, well-designed, or applicable to one's own practice area, can be challenging. The Southeastern Research Group Endeavor (SERGE-45) network reviewed antimicrobial stewardship-related, peer-reviewed literature from 2020 that detailed actionable interventions. The top 13 publications were summarized following identification using a modified Delphi technique. This article highlights the selected interventions and may serve as a key resource for teaching and training, and to identify novel or optimized stewardship opportunities within one's institution.

Comparison of Pharmacist-Directed Management of Multiplex PCR Blood Culture Results with Conventional Microbiology Methods on Effective and Optimal Therapy within a Community Hospital.

Multiplex PCR combined with a pharmacist-driven reporting protocol was compared to the standard of care within a community hospital to evaluate initial changes after notification of a positive blood culture. The intervention group demonstrated decreased times to changes in antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.0081), increased changes to optimal antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.013), and decreased vancomycin use for coagulase-negative staphylococcus contaminants (P < 0.01) with multiplex PCR implementation and pharmacist intervention.

Prevalence and predictors of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms at a large tertiary centre in the USA.

OBJECTIVES: The epidemiology of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) due to ceftriaxone-resistant organisms has not been well studied in the USA. The primary objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and predictors of ceftriaxone-resistant SBP at a large US tertiary-care centre. METHODS: This 1:1:4 case-case-control study included 141 adults with liver cirrhosis admitted from November 2011 to March 2016. Case group 1 were patients with SBP with a ceftriaxone-resistant organism (n=21). Case group 2 were patients with SBP with a ceftriaxone-susceptible organism (n=26). The control group were patients without SBP (n=94). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of ceftriaxone-resistant SBP. RESULTS: Fifty isolates were identified from 47 patients with culture-positive SBP (case groups 1 and 2). Of these 50 isolates, 32 (64%) were Gram-negatives [mostly Enterobacteriaceae (91%)], 15 (30%) were Gram-positives and 3 (6%) were Candida spp. The prevalence of ceftriaxone resistance in patients with culture-positive SBP was 45% (21/47). The most common ceftriaxone-resistant organisms were ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (45%). Independent predictors of ceftriaxone-resistant SBP included duration of ß-lactam therapy in the past 90days (aOR=1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.13) and recent invasive gastrointestinal procedure (aOR=12.47, 95% CI 2.74-56.67). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ceftriaxone-resistant SBP was significant at a US tertiary centre. Local epidemiological data and identification of risk factors associated with ceftriaxone-resistant SBP, e.g. increased usage of previous ß-lactam therapy and invasive gastrointestinal procedure, may help clinicians identify patients requiring alternative empirical antibiotics.

Predicting the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients receiving colistimethate sodium: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: With increasing rates of infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms, clinicians resort to older agents such as colistimethate sodium (CMS) despite a significant risk of nephrotoxicity. Several risk factors for CMS-associated nephrotoxicity have been reported, but they have yet to be validated. We compared the performance of published mathematical models in predicting the risk of CMS-associated nephrotoxicity. METHODS: In a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study, adult patients (≥18 years of age) were evaluated from five large academic medical centres in the USA. Patients with normal renal function (baseline serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL) who received intravenous CMS for ≥72 h were followed for up to 30 days. The development of nephrotoxicity was as defined by the RIFLE criteria. Each published model was conditioned using patient-specific variables to predict the risk of nephrotoxicity. The predictive performance of the models was evaluated using the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio. The most significant cut-off threshold for stratifying patients into high and low risk of nephrotoxicity was identified using classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: A total of 106 patients were examined (mean age 53.3 ±â€Š14.9 years, 66% male); the overall observed nephrotoxicity rate was 52.8%. We identified a simple model demonstrating reasonable overall nephrotoxicity risk assessment [O/E ratio of 1.07 (95% CI = 0.81-1.39)] and high sensitivity (92.9%) in predicting nephrotoxicity development in patients on CMS therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a model that could be incorporated into patient management strategies to reduce the risk of nephrotoxicity in patients requiring CMS therapy.