New Perspectives on Escherichia coli Signal Peptidase I Substrate Specificity: Investigating Why the TasA Cleavage Site Is Incompatible with LepB Cleavage.

Escherichia coli signal peptidase I (LepB) has been shown to inefficiently cleave secreted proteins with aromatic amino acids at the second position after the signal peptidase cleavage site (P2'). The Bacillus subtilis exported protein TasA contains a phenylalanine at P2', which in B. subtilis is cleaved by a dedicated archaeal-organism-like signal peptidase, SipW. We have previously shown that when the TasA signal peptide is fused to maltose binding protein (MBP) up to the P2' position, the TasA-MBP fusion protein is cleaved very inefficiently by LepB. However, the precise reason why the TasA signal peptide hinders cleavage by LepB is not known. In this study, a set of 11 peptides were designed to mimic the inefficiently cleaved secreted proteins, wild-type TasA and TasA-MBP fusions, to determine whether the peptides interact with and inhibit the function of LepB. The binding affinity and inhibitory potential of the peptides against LepB were assessed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and a LepB enzyme activity assay. Molecular modeling of the interaction between TasA signal peptide and LepB indicated that the tryptophan residue at P2 (two amino acids before the cleavage site) inhibited the active site serine-90 residue on LepB from accessing the cleavage site. Replacing the P2 tryptophan with alanine (W26A) allowed for more efficient processing of the signal peptide when the TasA-MBP fusion was expressed in E. coli. The importance of this residue to inhibit signal peptide cleavage and the potential to design LepB inhibitors based on the TasA signal peptide are discussed. IMPORTANCE Signal peptidase I is an important drug target, and understanding its substrate is critically important to develop new bacterium-specific drugs. To that end, we have a unique signal peptide that we have shown is refractory to processing by LepB, the essential signal peptidase I in E. coli, but previously has been shown to be processed by a more human-like signal peptidase found in some bacteria. In this study, we demonstrate how the signal peptide can bind but is unable to be processed by LepB, using a variety of methods. This can inform the field on how to better design drugs that can target LepB and understand the differences between bacterial and human-like signal peptidases.

The role of signal sequence proximal residues in the mature region of bacterial secreted proteins in E. coli.

Secreted proteins contain an N-terminal signal peptide to guide them through the secretion pathway. Once the protein is translocated, the signal peptide is removed by a signal peptidase, such as signal peptidase I. The signal peptide has been extensively studied and reviewed; however, the mature region has not been the focus of review. Here we cover the experimental evidence that highlights the important role of the mature region amino acid residues in both the efficiency and the ability of secreted proteins to be successfully exported via secretion pathways and cleaved by signal peptidase I.

Expression of the Bacillus subtilis TasA signal peptide leads to cell death in Escherichia coli due to inefficient cleavage by LepB.

Bacillus subtilis has five type I signal peptidases, one of these, SipW, is an archaeal-like peptidase. SipW is expressed in an operon (tapA-sipW-tasA) and is responsible for removing the signal peptide from two proteins: TapA and TasA. It is unclear from the signal peptide sequence of TasA and TapA, why an archaeal-like signal peptidase is required for their processing. Bioinformatic analysis of TasA and TapA indicates that both contain highly similar signal peptide cleavage sites, both predicted to be cleaved by Escherichia coli signal peptidase I, LepB. We show that expressing full length TasA in E. coli is toxic and leads to cell death. To determine if this phenotype is due to the inability of the E. coli LepB to process the TasA signal peptide, we fused the TasA signal peptide and two amino acids of mature TasA (up to P2') to both maltose binding protein (MBP) and ß-lactamase (Bla). We observed a defect in secretion, indicated by an abundance of unprocessed protein with both TasA-MBP and TasA-Bla fusions. A series of mutations in both TasA-MBP and TasA-Bla were made around the junction of the TasA signal peptide and the fusion protein. Both of these studies indicate that residues around the predicted TasA signal sequence cleavage site, particularly the sequence from P3 to P2', inhibit processing by LepB. The cell death observed when TasA and TasA signal sequence fusion proteins are expressed is likely due to the TasA signal peptide blocking LepB and thereby the general secretion pathway.

Efficient function of signal peptidase 1 of Escherichia coli is partly determined by residues in the mature N-terminus of exported proteins.

Exported proteins require an N-terminal signal peptide to direct them from the cytoplasm to the periplasm. Once the protein has been translocated across the cytoplasmic membrane, the signal peptide is cleaved by a signal peptidase, allowing the remainder of the protein to fold into its mature state in the periplasm. Signal peptidase I (LepB) cleaves non-lipoproteins and recognises the sequence Ala-X-Ala. Amino acids present at the N-terminus of mature, exported proteins have been shown to affect the efficiency at which the protein is exported. Here we investigated a bias against aromatic amino acids at the second position in the mature protein (P2'). Maltose binding protein (MBP) was mutated to introduce aromatic amino acids (tryptophan, tyrosine and phenylalanine) at P2'. All mutants with aromatic amino acids at P2' were exported less efficiently as indicated by a slight increase in precursor protein in vivo. Binding of LepB to peptides that encompass the MBP cleavage site were analysed using surface plasmon resonance. These studies showed peptides with an aromatic amino acid at P2' had a slower off rate, due to a significantly higher binding affinity for LepB. These data are consistent with the accumulation of small amounts of preMBP in purified protein samples. Hence, the reason for the lack of aromatic amino acids at P2' in E. coli is likely due to interference with efficient LepB activity. These data and previous bioinformatics strongly suggest that aromatic amino acids are not preferred at P2' and this should be incorporated into signal peptide prediction algorithms.