Genetic variants of PARP4 gene and PARP4P2 pseudogene in patients with multiple primary tumors including thyroid cancer.

Recently, the PARP4 gene has been identified as a possible susceptibility gene of primary thyroid and breast cancers. We analyzed PARP4 in 53 patients with multiple primary cancers including a thyroid cancer (TC), in 74 patients with TC alone, and in 88 healthy donors. Two PARP4 intronic variants within the IVS29 (c.3543 + 44T > C) and the IVS22 (c.2758 + 9G > A) were found only in the two patient groups. Moreover, we found a rare variant (r.522C > A) within a PARP4 pseudogene (PARP4P2) in one patient with four primary tumors, and with a familial cancer history. PARP4 mRNA was absent in all primary tumors and matched normal tissues, whereas the pseudogene variant transcript was always expressed. Consistently, immunostaining for PARP4 protein was negative at nuclear level in all tissues, thus suggesting that PARP4P2 pseudogene variant could alter its regulatory role on PARP4, inducing the down-regulation of PARP4 expression at both tumor and normal tissues level. In conclusion, germline intronic PARP4 variants could be a risk factor for the development of TC, and PARP4P2 pseudogene variations associated with PARP4 down-regulation may confer susceptibility to develop multiple metachronous cancers.

Morphological distribution of µ chains and cd15 receptors in colorectal polyp and adenocarcinoma specimens.

BACKGROUND: We have recently investigated the localisation of immunoglobulin-producing cells (IPCs) in inflamed intestinal tissue samples from patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and identified two main patterns of B lymphocyte infiltration: one characterised by the moderate strong stromal localisation of small B1 cell-like IgM+/CD79+/CD20-/CD21-/CD23-/CD5 ± IPCs, and the other by the peri-glandular localisation of IPCs with irregular nuclei that had surface markers specific for a B cell subset (IgM and CD79), but quantitative differences in their λ and κ chains. The same patients were also tested for CD15+ receptors, which were localised on inflammatory cell surfaces or in the crypts of the intestinal epithelium. CD15+ receptor distribution in inflamed tissues was limited to the cell structures. The aim of the study was to analyse variations in IPCs and CD15+ cell morphology or distribution in bowel biopsy specimens taken from patients with pre-malignant polyps or adenocarcinomas. METHODS: IPCs were analysed by means of immunofluorescence using polyclonal goat anti-human µ chains. The pre-malignant polyp specimens were tested for B cell surface phenotype λ and κ chains, CD79, CD20, CD21 and CD23 using an immunoperoxidase method. CD15+ cells were evaluated using the immunoperoxidase method and monoclonal anti-CD15 IgM. RESULTS: The study involved 14 patients (four with pre-malignant polyps and 10 with colorectal adenocarcinomas). The distribution of µ chains and CD15 markers varied in all of the biopsies, but delineated normal cell structures in the pre-malignant polyp specimens. B cell surface phenotype analysis of µ chain-positive cells identified a subset of CD79+/CD20-/CD21-/CD23- IPCs. The IPCs in certain areas showed the sporadic disintegration of inflammatory cell membranes or the accumulation of fluorescence in individual cells. IPC membrane disintegration was particularly marked in all of the adenocarcinoma samples, in which the CD15 markers also showed epithelial cell involvement. Furthermore, six of the ten adenocarcinoma samples had atypical and reorganised membranes that expressed an excess of both receptors and isolated small portions of tissue within the tumour. CONCLUSION: The findings of this preliminary morphological study suggest the presence of membrane disintegration and remodelling mechanisms in the tumours. The newly-formed membranes expressed high concentrations of inflammatory cell receptors that can confer adhesive properties.