RESUMO
Acute appendicitis is one of the most frequent causes of lower abdominal pain and requires immediate surgical intervention. The diagnosis often poses a lot of challenge even to experienced surgeon. Those patients with equivocal symptoms may require different imaging modalities like radiography, contrast examination and ultrasound with limited utility. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) used in suspected acute appendicitis has, however, resulted in improved diagnostic accuracy and also reduction of negative surgeries. Objective We intend to determine the diagnostic efficiency of MDCT in clinically equivocal cases of acute appendicitis correlating it with surgical/histopathological findings. Materials and methods A group of 116 patients was included in this study. Spiral MDCT was performed in all these cases after administration of oral and intravenous contrast. All these patients underwent surgery and the CT findings were correlated with histopathology. Out of these 116 patients, 60 patients were male and 56 female. The age range was from three to seventy years and mean age was 28+1 years. Results The results proved that MDCT had a sensitivity of 97.5%, specificity of 97.0%, and accuracy of 97.4% for the diagnosis of appendicitis with one false positive and two false negative cases. The study showed 100% accuracy in diagnosing acute appendicitis in children. In 33 patients, an alternate cause was identified with CT. The alternate diagnosis made on CT findings was consistent with the final diagnosis in 27 (81.8%) of 33 patients in whom there was no evidence of acute appendicitis. The clinical diagnosis disagreed with the CT diagnosis in six patients (18.18%). Conclusion Our study verifies that MDCT plays an important role in evaluation and consequent management of equivocal cases of acute appendicitis. MDCT is also able to diagnose appendicitis or detect alternative diagnosis in pediatric population.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to review the results of pelvic arterial embolization (PAE) performed in the interventional radiology suite. METHOD: The data of all patients in whom pelvic angioembolization was performed was collected from July 2011 to June 2017. Procedures were performed by an experienced interventional radiologist. The clinical and laboratory data, as well as the outcome data, were obtained from the medical records of our hospital. The following parameters were collected for each patient, including the age, gender, presenting symptoms, site of bleeding, catheters used for embolization, material used for embolization, previous computed tomography (CT) scan and/or focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) ultrasound, average hemoglobin before the procedure, and patient clinical status on discharge. RESULT: A total of 37 patients underwent pelvic angiography for acute hemorrhage at our institution. They had contrast blush, active extravasation, or abnormal vascularity from the branches of the internal iliac artery and underwent therapeutic transcatheter embolization. A total of 29 patients (78.3%) were male and 8 (21.7%) were female. The average age was 30.0 years (range: 6-90 year). Of these, 16 patients (43.2%) presented with road traffic accidents (RTAs), six with gunshot injuries (16.2%), six with iatrogenic injuries (16.2%), four with a history of a fall (10.8%), two with bomb blast injuries (5.4%), one with a history of a glass injury (2.7%), one had a history of a roof falling on her during an earthquake, and one patient had a pelvic pseudoaneurysm secondary to an abscess. The type of embolic material used for embolization included coils in 16 patients, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles were used in eight patients, both PVA particles and coils were used in 11 patients, and glue was used in one patient. All were successfully embolized. Thirty-four were discharged while three patients expired during the course of hospital stay due to other coexisting morbidities. CONCLUSION: The management of pelvic injuries has always been a topic of debate, with multiple methods reported to date but growing evidence supports the use of pelvic arterial embolization in hemorrhagic pelvic injuries. The formulation of a standardized protocol is the need of the day.
