Comparison of models for genetic evaluation of scrotal circumference in crossbred bulls.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of including concomitant body weight and(or) a random dam effect in genetic evaluation models on variance component estimates and standard error of prediction for scrotal circumference (SC) at 6, 8, 10, and 12 mo. Variance components and average standard errors of prediction were compared under models differing in either the number of related traits (M11 [SC], M12 [SC and BW]) or an uncorrelated random dam effect (M21 [SC], M22 [SC and BW]) using records on 1,547 bull calves. In a single-trait model (M11), estimates of direct heritabilities (h2a) for SC were .45, .49, .57, and .66 at 6, 8, 10, and 12 mo, respectively. In a two-trait model (M12), h2a were similar to those in M11 model. In M21, h2a for SC were .37, .42, .54, and .65, whereas the proportions of phenotypic variance due to dams (d2) were .12, .11, .04, and .02 at 6, 8, 10, and 12 mo, respectively. Similarly, in M22, h2a for SC were .36, .44, .56, and .65 and d2 were .13, .10, .02, and .02. Standard errors of prediction for SC EBV from M22 were reduced by 2.86, 1.21, 3.02, and 1.99% relative to M21 and by 6.45, 2.70, 2.72, and 1.21% relative to M11 at 6, 8, 10, and 12 mo, respectively. Standard errors of prediction for SC EBV from M12 were reduced by .06, .73, 1.56, and .87% relative to M11 at 6, 8, 10, and 12 mo, respectively. The importance of the dam effect decreased with age for both SC and BW. These results demonstrate that a two-trait (SC and BW) animal model would result in more accurate evaluations of yearling SC EBV in beef cattle than a single-trait model.

The effect of levels of concentrate in feedlot diets on the health status of beef calves.

In this two year study we investigated the effect that the level of concentrate in feedlot diet had on the occurrence of health problems in bull calves belonging to two multibreed groups.In each of the two years, the 168 day feedlot period was divided into two equal periods of 77 days with an intervening 14 day adjustment period. During the first period, the animals in half of the pens within each breed-group received a high concentrate (85% grain) diet (H) while the rest of the pens received a diet (L) of hay ad libitum and half as much concentrate as the bulls on high concentrate. The L diet contained an average of 48% grain. In the second period, diets of bulls in half of the pens within each breed-group were switched from L to H and vice versa. During the feedlot period, the incidence of sickness among bulls was recorded. Disease incidence was higher in the second year compared to the first. In the second year, 49 out of 56 (87.5%) calves on the high concentrate diet required treatment for respiratory infections compared to only four (7.14%) in bulls on the low concentrate diet. The results suggest that a high concentrate diet for animals in feedlots may be more stressful to calves coming directly to the feedlot following weaning compared to a low concentrate diet, thereby acting as an additional predisposing factor to respiratory infections.