Shared decision-making: applying a person-centered approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options.

BACKGROUND: A person-centered approach to co-decision-making using tailored information respects each woman's preferences and may heighten breast reconstruction satisfaction. METHODS: Women seeking breast reconstruction underwent initial and follow-up consultations wherein suitable options were discussed, and take-away material, balanced website links, and access to a nurse specialist and peer volunteers was provided. After reconstruction, the BRECON-31(©) was administered and analyzed in three groups: autologous, alloplastic, and latissimus dorsi (LD)/implant. BRECON-31(©) subscale scores were compared between the groups, and multiple regression used to determine if the type of reconstruction independently predicted satisfaction. RESULTS: One hundred twenty three of 176 (70%) women completed the questionnaire (43% autologous, 47% alloplastic, and 10% LD/implant reconstructions). The LD/implant group had a low rate of immediate reconstruction (8.3%, P = 0.04), and the highest rate of chemotherapy (91.7%, P = 0.002) and radiation (100%, P = 0.003). The alloplastic group had a high rate of bilateral reconstruction (86.8%, P = 0.01). All groups scored well on the self-image, arm concerns, intimacy, satisfaction, and expectations subscales. All groups scored moderately on the self-consciousness, appearance, and nipple subscales. The autologous group scored the lowest on recovery (51 vs. 68 and 65, P < 0.0001) and only moderately well on the abdomen subscale (67). Multiple regression analysis showed that satisfaction was not driven by type of reconstruction (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: High satisfaction can be achieved using a person-centered approach by providing detailed information, appreciating each woman's unique features, and tailoring the reconstruction plan to the individual. Recovery remains a particular challenge, especially for women undergoing autologous reconstruction.

The breast reconstruction satisfaction questionnaire (BRECON-31): an affirmative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To verify the subscale structure of the BRECON-31 using a test sample of women naïve to the questionnaire. METHODS: The BRECON-31 was administered to women following breast reconstruction. Their responses were subjected to principal components analysis (PCA) with a varimax rotation. Components were maintained with an Eigenvalue greater than one. Internal consistency reliability was measured with Cronbach's Alpha (CA). Components on the test pool analysis were then compared with the subscales developed on 128 women who completed the questionnaire during the development phase. RESULTS: Fifty women completed the BRECON-31. Development and test pools of women were similar across demographics, pathology, and surgical details, except the development sample was somewhat older (53 yo vs. 49 yo, P = 0.02). Using PCA, eight subscales again emerged: self-image, arm concerns, intimacy, satisfaction, recovery, self-consciousness, expectations, and breast appearance. A nipple, and abdominal strength and appearance subscales also emerged. Forty-one of the 45 items loaded similarly in the development and test pools. Internal consistency reliability was high, with CA in the test pool equaling or exceeding CA in the development pool in the majority of the subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The BRECON-31 factor structure identified in the development pool was supported by the test pool, with similar reliability.

Development of a breast reconstruction satisfaction questionnaire (BRECON-31): principal components analysis and clinimetric properties.

BACKGROUND: A reliable, valid questionnaire is essential to assess patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction. METHODS: A 105-item pilot BRECON questionnaire was previously developed. One hundred eighty-one women with breast reconstruction were mailed the pilot BRECON, BREAST-Q, and EQ-5D questionnaires. Fifty women were re-mailed the BRECON. Based on the responses, the BRECON was refined using statistical means and principal components analysis (PCA). Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's alpha. Validity was assessed by comparing subscales of the BRECON to the BREAST-Q and comparing a summary score of the BRECON-31 to the EQ-5D using the Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). RESULTS: A total of 71% (128/181) of women completed the three questionnaires, and 86% (43/50) of women responded to the re-mailed BRECON. Statistical methods and PCA maintained 31 items covering eight components including self-image, arm concerns, intimacy, satisfaction, recovery, self-consciousness, expectations, and breast appearance. A 4-item "nipple" subscale and a 10-item "abdominal" subscale were developed for use where applicable. Measures of reliability and validity were high: Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.67 to 0.91, ICC ranged from 0.55 to 0.85, and PCC ranged from 0.42 to 0.76. CONCLUSIONS: A reliable, valid 31-item breast reconstruction satisfaction questionnaire was developed.