Secondary medical prevention and clinical outcome in coronary artery disease patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention: A report from the CORONOR investigators.

AIM: To assess the level of secondary prevention and the outcome of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients who have a history of non-coronary vascular intervention. BACKGROUND: Patients with polyvascular disease have been reported to receive less evidence-based medications, with worse risk factor control and to be at higher risk than patients with single-bed disease. It is unknown whether these findings remain valid in the modern era of secondary prevention. METHODS: We included 4184 patients with stable CAD. Two groups were formed according to the absence (n = 3704) or presence (n = 480) of a history of non-coronary vascular intervention. Treatments and risk factor control were recorded at inclusion. Follow-up was performed after 2 years. RESULTS: Antiplatelets, angiotensin system antagonists, beta-blockers and statins were widely prescribed in both groups. The number of antihypertensive drugs was higher in patients with non-coronary vascular intervention. Except for slight increases in the rate of current smokers and in systolic blood pressure, risk factor control was similar between groups. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality rates were higher in patients with non-coronary intervention with adjusted HR of 1.55 (1.13-2.13) (p = 0.007), and 1.98 (1.24-3.15) (p = 0.004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In modern practice and real life conditions, the higher risk of CAD patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention is taken into account, with more intense secondary prevention and similar risk factor control than patients without such history. In spite of the level of secondary prevention, patients with a history of non-coronary vascular intervention remain at high risk of cardiovascular events. This should be an incentive to discuss more stringent objectives for secondary prevention in patients with polyvascular disease.

A prospective evaluation of left ventricular remodeling after inaugural anterior myocardial infarction as a function of gene polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, adrenergic, and metalloproteinase systems.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular remodeling (LVR) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events after myocardial infarction (MI). Although several factors have been shown to influence LVR, interindividual variability exists. Some studies have suggested that gene polymorphisms may be associated with LVR, but these studies were limited by either a retrospective design or the inclusion of limited patient numbers. The present study was designed to prospectively assess the impact of gene polymorphisms on LVR. METHODS: We included 266 patients with inaugural anterior MI. Systematic echocardiographic follow-ups were performed at 3 months and at 1 year after MI. The polymorphisms were selected using a candidate gene approach based on LVR pathophysiology. We analyzed 14 polymorphisms in 3 different systems: the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (ACE I/D, RAT1 1166A/C, angiotensinogen M235T, CYP11B2 -344C/T), the adrenergic system (beta1AR Ser49Gly, beta1AR Gly389Arg, beta2AR Gly16Arg, beta2AR Gln27Glu, beta2AR Thr164Ile, alpha2cAR Del322-325), and the metalloproteinase (MMP) system (-1607 1G/2G MMP-1, -1306 C/T MMP-2, -1171 5A/6A MMP-3, -1562 C/T MMP-9). RESULTS: Left ventricular remodeling was documented by a progressive increase in end-diastolic volume from 56.5 +/- 14.9 mL/m2 at baseline to 62.8 +/- 18.8 mL/m2 at 1 year (P < .0001). End-diastolic volume at baseline, 3 months, or 1 year did not differ significantly among genotypes for any polymorphism. The change in end-diastolic volume from baseline to 1 year was also similar among genotypes for all polymorphisms. CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular remodeling after MI is not associated with common polymorphisms in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, adrenergic, or MMP systems.